CRHeel94
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 712
Oooh...I'm guessing it's about six programs.Guess how many programs have made the NCAAT 4+ years in row.
Extra credit if you can name them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oooh...I'm guessing it's about six programs.Guess how many programs have made the NCAAT 4+ years in row.
Extra credit if you can name them.
Ever? Or the last 4 years?Guess how many programs have made the NCAAT 4+ years in row.
Extra credit if you can name them.
Only 2 blue bloods on that list. Gonzaga ain’t a blue blood but they have the 2nd longest,active streak (behind Mich State) with 24 consecutive appearances. I forgot Kansas had their streak derailed in 2018 due to some “issues”… but they still make the list of 4+ years in a row.Looks like it's indeed six. Went and saw the list...would have only gotten two right (and one because of a technicality) in Kansas and Michigan State. Two more make sense because of the recent success of those programs (Gonzaga, Baylor). Would have never hit the last two to be perfectly honest.
I believe it was 6 before last season.Just figure out I misread the wikipedia table, so it's more than six (think that's the number the have made it past first round four years in a row).
Looks like the count is 14.
I don’t know if I would consider vacated wins a derailment of the streak. The wins may not be there on paper, but I saw Kansas go to the Final Four in 2018.Only 2 blue bloods on that list. Gonzaga ain’t a blue blood but they have the 2nd longest,active streak (behind Mich State) with 24 consecutive appearances. I forgot Kansas had their streak derailed in 2018 due to some “issues”… but they still make the list of 4+ years in a row.
Purdue, Houston and Tennessee round out the list.
Interesting to note the big names missing - including some *blue bloods: d00k*, Kentucky*, UConn*, Nova, Michigan, UVa., Louisville, ‘Cuse… and of course UNC*
Only because it’s inconsistent and hypocritical is it an issue but I’d think you wouldn’t want teams that were caught cheating to get credit for their accomplishments.I don’t know if I would consider vacated wins a derailment of the streak. The wins may not be there on paper, but I saw Kansas go to the Final Four in 2018.
Credit or no credit, you can’t erase actual history and it doesn’t mean a certain accomplishment didn’t happen. But also keep in mind that these wins weren’t vacated due to Kansas cheating. The wins were vacated because Silvio De Sousa was subsequently ruled ineligible due to payments his guardian received from a Maryland booster to steer him to Maryland and due to $2,500 his guardian received to pay for De Sousa’s online high school courses.Only because it’s inconsistent and hypocritical is it an issue but I’d think you wouldn’t want teams that were caught cheating to get credit for their accomplishments.
It’s really not that important.Credit or no credit, you can’t erase actual history and it doesn’t mean a certain accomplishment didn’t happen. But also keep in mind that these wins weren’t vacated due to Kansas cheating. The wins were vacated because Silvio De Sousa was subsequently ruled ineligible due to payments his guardian received from a Maryland booster to steer him to Maryland and due to $2,500 his guardian received to pay for De Sousa’s online high school courses.
In any event, Kansas’s streak was broken based on having the NCAAT appearance and wins vacated as the result of having a little-used player deemed ineligible due to payments he received unrelated to Kansas rather than based on having a subpar season.
I believe it's called "5 guys doing stuff".Can someone tell me what kind of offense Carolina is playing?