—> US Sends More Immigrants to Salvadoran Prison | SCOTUS orders Admin to “facilitate” return of Abrego Garcia

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 22K
  • Politics 
What would the evidence look like?
Documents, photos, videos, sworn testimony. The same evidence that you have in every other court proceeding. Do you seriously think the Trump admin should just be able to come into court and say whoever it wants is "MS-13" and not be expected to identify the basis for that assertion?

If you don't even know what "evidence" means my suggestion would be to leave the discussion of legal issues to people with law degrees.
 
I don’t understand how the legal system treats certain words.

Maybe “facilitate” means “get this done by X time and Y date.”

I don’t know why judges are not putting things into simple language.

For instance, “You must bring Mr. Abrego Garcia into this courtroom by 4:00 pm, Wednesday, April 16th, 2025.”

“This Court is not talking about “facilitating or effectuating” his appearance. This Court is saying you have him here by Wednesday, April 16th, 2025 at 4:00 pm or you (Person(s) explicitly named) will be found in contempt and jailed until Mr. Abrego Garcia is in this courtroom.”

Granted, I don’t know what the legal definition or use of certain words is. I do know that “facilitate” or “effectuate” are vague, pansy-ass words to most people.
I don't disagree with you overall about the use of "legalese" but the Supreme Court basically said the district court couldn't order the administration to do the things you want it to order. I think the original reason the court used "facilitate" and "effectuate" was to try to avoid a finding that it overstepped its authority.
 
A judge said Trump was liable for sexual assault and guilty of 34 felonies.
Didn’t separate JURIES find Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation in one case and guilty of 34 felonies in another case? And, a separate jury found Trump liable again for defamation as he continued to lie about Jean Carroll and awarded her $80+ million.

JURIES, not a judge.
 

He Represented Contentious Immigration Cases for the Government. His Candor Lost Him His Job.​

Erez Reuveni, a career Justice Department attorney, made no excuses for the government’s error in deporting a man to an El Salvador prison​


🎁 🔗 —> https://www.wsj.com/us-news/law/thi...38?st=VJcA6Z&reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink

“When a judge expressed outrage that the first Trump administration had “spirited away” a mother and daughter in the middle of a hearing on their asylum claims, Justice Department lawyer Erez Reuveni didn’t argue.

“I don’t disagree with the sentiment, Your Honor,” the Justice Department lawyer told U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan in August 2018. He said he had only just learned that the pair had been put on a plane and would do “everything we can” to get them back.

… Earlier this month, Reuveni acknowledged he didn’t know why the government had sent a Maryland man named Kilmar Abrego Garcia to a Salvadoran prison in error. A judge had ruled years before that he shouldn’t be returned to his home country.

… Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Reuveni the next day he was suspended for failing to follow orders and hurting the government’s position.

During the hearing Xinis repeatedly thanked Reuveni for his candor. Ruling from the bench, she said the U.S. must bring Abrego Garcia back. The Supreme Court agreed, telling the Trump administration to seek his return. …
 
I'm wondering if he appealed that 2019 order, which was bullshit, or if he just relied on the withholding from removal order to figure, don't fix what's not broken.

I don't know what would happen if he didn't file an appeal. This would be the sort of thing that the Supreme Court would seize on in a second. "Oh, he didn't exhaust all remedies previously even though there was no reason to, so now he's fucked."
 
I would just like to get some Biden/Harris supporter's or unwavering Democrat party voter's thoughts on why it is you think the Biden administration allowed, and actually encouraged, millions of illegals to pour into our country? And I mean the real reason?

Trump had historic, at the time, low numbers of border crossings his first term. Biden sent out the Bat Signal to the world on how Trump's border policies were racist, how they would immediately stop border wall construction, and overturned Trump border policy after border policy until we effectively had an open border which led to the highest number of illegal crossings in our country's history over any previous four-year period....much of which was during a pandemic and at a time when thousands upon thousands of Americans were dying from overdoses of Fentanyl coming over the border. The drug cartels made untold billions from the trafficking of humans into the US that everyone knows will be spent to further their criminal enterprises and all we heard during those Biden years was either the border was secure, which was an absolute lie and only a fool would have believed, or Congress needed to act in order to solve the immigration crisis. This also has been proven to be a lie since border crossings are down 90+% since Trump took office again with the exact same immigration laws as were in place for Biden.

Now we see Democrats holding up their "Save Medicaid" signs while apparently failing to realize or, even worse, actually knowing but purposely ignoring the fact that the billions upon billions of dollars that we have and will continue to spend providing services to the millions of illegals who simply walked in or who were flown in during Biden's term is money that has and will continue to come out of the exact same resources that go to fund Medicaid. It's like screaming "MAN THE PUMPS" on the Titanic while at the same time, drilling holes in bottom of the ship. And all this is without even mentioning the criminal elements that have inevitably entered the US when the world knew there had never been a better time to do so.

So, here we are....the American taxpayer, both you and me no matter which side of the aisle you're on, after having been pillaged by the American politician to the sum of $36 trillion dollars, on top of all the social services we already provide, in the position of having to take care of millions of indigent illegal immigrants who were welcomed into this country when the border could have been effectively shut down just like it is right now, in an effort to achieve something. And make no mistake, an effort of this magnitude was definitely an effort to achieve a goal.

So, my honest question to the, I would say Democrats but since I am one and I know I didn't vote for either of those two, I'll say to the Biden/Kamala supporters or the "vote Democrat at all costs" people on this board, what exactly do you think that goal was?
 
I would just like to get some Biden/Harris supporter's or unwavering Democrat party voter's thoughts on why it is you think the Biden administration allowed, and actually encouraged, millions of illegals to pour into our country? And I mean the real reason?

Trump had historic, at the time, low numbers of border crossings his first term. Biden sent out the Bat Signal to the world on how Trump's border policies were racist, how they would immediately stop border wall construction, and overturned Trump border policy after border policy until we effectively had an open border which led to the highest number of illegal crossings in our country's history over any previous four-year period....much of which was during a pandemic and at a time when thousands upon thousands of Americans were dying from overdoses of Fentanyl coming over the border. The drug cartels made untold billions from the trafficking of humans into the US that everyone knows will be spent to further their criminal enterprises and all we heard during those Biden years was either the border was secure, which was an absolute lie and only a fool would have believed, or Congress needed to act in order to solve the immigration crisis. This also has been proven to be a lie since border crossings are down 90+% since Trump took office again with the exact same immigration laws as were in place for Biden.

Now we see Democrats holding up their "Save Medicaid" signs while apparently failing to realize or, even worse, actually knowing but purposely ignoring the fact that the billions upon billions of dollars that we have and will continue to spend providing services to the millions of illegals who simply walked in or who were flown in during Biden's term is money that has and will continue to come out of the exact same resources that go to fund Medicaid. It's like screaming "MAN THE PUMPS" on the Titanic while at the same time, drilling holes in bottom of the ship. And all this is without even mentioning the criminal elements that have inevitably entered the US when the world knew there had never been a better time to do so.

So, here we are....the American taxpayer, both you and me no matter which side of the aisle you're on, after having been pillaged by the American politician to the sum of $36 trillion dollars, on top of all the social services we already provide, in the position of having to take care of millions of indigent illegal immigrants who were welcomed into this country when the border could have been effectively shut down just like it is right now, in an effort to achieve something. And make no mistake, an effort of this magnitude was definitely an effort to achieve a goal.

So, my honest question to the, I would say Democrats but since I am one and I know I didn't vote for either of those two, I'll say to the Biden/Kamala supporters or the "vote Democrat at all costs" people on this board, what exactly do you think that goal was?
How many of them came from Narnia?

I only ask because most of your post is premised in pure fantasy.

It is hard to give an honest answer to a question based on lies.
 
I would just like to get some Biden/Harris supporter's or unwavering Democrat party voter's thoughts on why it is you think the Biden administration allowed, and actually encouraged, millions of illegals to pour into our country? And I mean the real reason?

Trump had historic, at the time, low numbers of border crossings his first term. Biden sent out the Bat Signal to the world on how Trump's border policies were racist, how they would immediately stop border wall construction, and overturned Trump border policy after border policy until we effectively had an open border which led to the highest number of illegal crossings in our country's history over any previous four-year period....much of which was during a pandemic and at a time when thousands upon thousands of Americans were dying from overdoses of Fentanyl coming over the border. The drug cartels made untold billions from the trafficking of humans into the US that everyone knows will be spent to further their criminal enterprises and all we heard during those Biden years was either the border was secure, which was an absolute lie and only a fool would have believed, or Congress needed to act in order to solve the immigration crisis. This also has been proven to be a lie since border crossings are down 90+% since Trump took office again with the exact same immigration laws as were in place for Biden.
Almost every word of this is false. Like, you don't even understand the basic facts. What's telling is that none of you can remotely describe what Biden did to create "open borders." You can't even define what open border means. Tell me what changed in Biden's administration -- a new regulation? a new formal policy? what is it?

If you can't describe what the supposed "open border" would look like, then you're just full of shit. I'm certainly not going to give you an opinion about something that you can't even define. You want my opinion; tell me what I'm supposed to have an opinion on. "Open borders" ain't it.
 
How many of them came from Narnia?

I only ask because most of your post is premised in pure fantasy.

It is hard to give an honest answer to a question based on lies.
But he's really a Democrat who is nonetheless just an "independent thinker" who didn't vote for either candidate, even though what he posted could have been cut-and-pasted straight from Fox or Newsmax or OAN. Sure, sure he is.
 
Almost every word of this is false. Like, you don't even understand the basic facts. . .

If you can't describe what the supposed "open border" would look like, then you're just full of shit.
Does it look like this, Vizzini? Source is LA Times
IMG_5574.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top