- Messages
- 2,351
I'd prefer more attrition in some cases around here...Clearly we could use more attribution around here.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd prefer more attrition in some cases around here...Clearly we could use more attribution around here.
Name themI don’t rely on those sources. You guys really should move beyond those sources though. I actually read as many, if not more “left” leaning sources. That’s how I know what a piece of shit the nyt is and carries a 28% “very credible” rating.
So did they throw Southern Living in there b/c he's from the South? And the trio of local rags based on more specific location info? What about Axioms? I assumed that was a typo for Axios, esp. when I looked up Axioms and found that it's "an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal of mathematics, mathematical logic and mathematical physics, published monthly online by MDPI."Pretty sure the Drudge homepage tailors links to specific users. You won't get the same landing page as calla.
I didn’t know that about the Drudge Report; but, I know little about the Drudge Report.Pretty sure the Drudge homepage tailors links to specific users. You won't get the same landing page as calla.
But anyway, he obviously pulled this list off a news feed. It is exactly the random collection of stuff that news feeds provide by default.
I don't know it about Drudge specifically but most of the aggregator sites do that.I didn’t know that about the Drudge Report; but, I know little about the Drudge Report.
I haven’t visited that site in 10+ years.
Here are some "fact-based" articles from the sources you apparently won't ignore, laying out some of the issues with Trump's admin so far. I'm sure there are plenty more but many of the sources you claim to read require subscriptions that I don't have. Bottom line: the idea that very little criticism of the damage the Trump admin is doing is "fact-based" is absurd.You assign your own ratings but my readings this morning consisted of
The Hill
Newsweek
The telegraph
the London Times
NY Post
Time
Reuters
The Wilmington Star
Fayetteville Observer
Christian Science Monitor
The Myrtle Beach Sun News
Travel Leisure
Axioms
Golf Digest
barons
Bloomberg Financial
Forbes
Business Insider
Fox Business
WSJ
Al Jazerra
PBS News
CBS News
Men’s Health
eSPN
SI
Fox News
BBC
Nat Geo
Yahoo sports
Business insider
Haaretz
Southern Living
Ok, how did this get to what thr Hilton could have done??? Nice moving of the goal posts, basically from Kenan to Wallace-Wade.Rather than trying to data mine articles to support a point I'm not even making, why don't you try to engage in the actual point I am discussing. Did you get a 200 on your SAT verbal score? It is like you have literally no reading comprehension whatsoever.
You have raised three points as to what the Hilton possibly could have done, one of which had nothing to do with the Hilton and zero of which would have made a rat's ass difference in the outcome last night.
There are legitimate discussions to be had about whether such events should be held at public hotels, whether the right security procedures were in place, and whether extra security should be provided for the press when they are near potential assassination targets. But none of that deals with what could have been done by the hotel to prevent the attempt last night.
You've had seven attempts to identify something and you have yet to make a cogent argument in support of your position -- instead you keep citing articles and raising irrelevant and inapposite points.
I agree that “senile” is not the correct term for Trumps mental issues. He’s just an old guy now that his age is starting to amplify the mental issues he’s always had such as how he uses social media (for one example). I mean what other President would post the bs he does on a daily basis?Only after his debate. You radically denied it for years. Only when caught did the left stab him in the back.
You don’t have to buy media outlets when you have them committing journalistic malpractice to influence elections. CBS, nbc, abc, cnn, msnbc, nyt, Wapo, latimes, pbs, npr, sf chronicle, Detroit free press Chicago tribune, the hill, New Yorker, guardian, the Atlantic. Jesus Christ, the left had a monopoly of media protection.
Love this campaign your side is on trying to claim he is senile. Did that come down from carville? Just makes you look more foolish. Nobody except for this board and the far left nuts running your party believe that. Congrats, you line up with aoc, Warren, crocket, Omar, jaypal, and………Marjorie green. How does it feel to have to side with her. Remember how y’all loved to talk about how crazy she was? Turns out you were right. She would fit right in on the zzl.
I have been asking you repeatedly things the hotel could/should have done differently. You have now responded by creating an amorphous, all-caps concept called "SECURITY" -- as if there is a single entity in charge of security at an event like this.Ok, how did this get to what thr Hilton could have done??? Nice moving of the goal posts, basically from Kenan to Wallace-Wade.
I noted several clear examples of things that SECURITY (SS, locals, and everyone in charge of that) could have and should have done.
This has been widely accepted as a security failure, other than by team Trump. Your lack of understanding or perhaps utter intransigence in order to be "right" here is pretty laughable. Since I don't really care how much of a fool you want to be on this, please carry on so you can feel better about yourself (I guess).
Oh, and it was a 740 way back in 1993.
Shut up, snowflakes.