Centerpiece
Honored Member
- Messages
- 983
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you have some basis you'd like to share for the assertion that he has only been prosecuted for these crimes because of his candidacy? I'm asking honestly if you know of other examples of such crimes that were not prosecuted. I look at what he was prosecuted for and think that pretty much anyone who does those things and it becomes well known ia gonna get prosecuted.Let me speak to just one part of this. I definitely think that the indictments have only further polarized Trump in both directions - as in, they’ve made people who hate him even more repulsed by him, while at the same time strengthening the loyalty to him from his supporters.
As someone who has a lot of Trump supporters in my circle, this makes sense to me. The main appeal of Trump is that he’s a Washington outsider who the folks in the “swamp” cannot stand, and they’ll do anything to make him go away. So Trump being prosecuted for these crimes (crimes he would never be prosecuted for unless he was running for reelection) is only going to make his supporters double down and support him more. The whole thing reinforces their perception that he’s a political outsider and that the political machine has no bottom when it comes to trying to get rid of him.
Basically, Trump’s whole legal mess encourages both his supporters and his haters to strengthen their conviction in how they feel about him.
Maybe because we never were likely to get the votes of people bothered by that. Maybe because pushing back gets it more attention. Maybe because people who are offended are too stupid and too big of a jerk to want on our side, despite needing the votes. Maybe not wanting to roll around in the pig manure with the swine who love it. Maybe all of these.It only takes one screw up in the blue wall states to throw this election. Noted on Morning Joe, there was some concern about the transgender ad Trump is using full force in those states and almost no push back from Harris Campaign. Shades of Swift boating?
But, in this case you have to wonder why not much push back? Could it be a reluctance to butt heads with a Dem special interest group that the push back would cause?
Yeah all of these, plus it’s almost impossible to finesse this issue. It’s incredibly complicated.Maybe because we never were likely to get the votes of people bothered by that. Maybe because pushing back gets it more attention. Maybe because people who are offended are too stupid and too big of a jerk to want on our side, despite needing the votes. Maybe not wanting to roll around in the pig manure with the swine who love it. Maybe all of these.
President Kerry's thought process was somewhat similar. And actually, to respond is an interesting gambit because this is actually a Trump policy that Trump is complaining about. Have a feeling there are some very clever ways to respond to this one.Maybe because we never were likely to get the votes of people bothered by that. Maybe because pushing back gets it more attention. Maybe because people who are offended are too stupid and too big of a jerk to want on our side, despite needing the votes. Maybe not wanting to roll around in the pig manure with the swine who love it. Maybe all of these.
“Special interest group?”It only takes one screw up in the blue wall states to throw this election. Noted on Morning Joe, there was some concern about the transgender ad Trump is using full force in those states and almost no push back from Harris Campaign. Shades of Swift boating?
But, in this case you have to wonder why not much push back? Could it be a reluctance to butt heads with a Dem special interest group that the push back would cause?
There are plenty of chimeras that could be chased. This seems off message and too defensive.President Kerry's thought process was somewhat similar. And actually, to respond is an interesting gambit because this is actually a Trump policy that Trump is complaining about. Have a feeling there are some very clever ways to respond to this one.
It was a question. Or is there some other explanation? Just too complicated to get into has been offered. Is that it?“Special interest group?”
It's a pretty stupid ass ad, honestly. You can tell the way they have pieced together the clips. I just doubt it's been very effectiveIt was a question. Or is there some other explanation? Just too complicated to get into has been offered. Is that it?
Perhaps. But not responding appropriately to such things have always proven to be a killer.There are plenty of chimeras that could be chased. This seems off message and too defensive.
I knew that it had its origins with Trump and it would be clever. The cleverness would be wasted and the story disbelieved so why bother?
Willie Horton ad was stupid ass too. Dems big poll lead disappeared quick. No Dem response.It's a pretty stupid ass ad, honestly. You can tell the way they have pieced together the clips. I just doubt it's been very effective
You might want to reexamine your thoughts about this if you equate it with Swiftboating. This should, for someone who respects other people, be some serious small change.Perhaps. But not responding appropriately to such things have always proven to be a killer.