Bigs23
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 716
Right. How do you reach people this clueless?So they should appeal to the chaos crowd?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right. How do you reach people this clueless?So they should appeal to the chaos crowd?
I bet if you asked that 47% which of Harris' policies they consider "too progressive" most of them couldn't do it. Or they would ascribe a position to her that is false because they get their news from liars.47% in the NYT poll say Harris is too progressive. 9% says she is not progressive enough.
Sounds like they talked to a lot of Republicans.
I personally think a big part of it is speaking simply and directly about what programs Harris would propose to directly adresss young people’s economic concerns and struggles. Easy to understand solutions to their problems.Right. How do you reach people this clueless?
So this group of young people don't "get" that Trump doesn't have a plan but want details of Harris' plans? You seem to be contradicting yourself in what these young people want.It’s okay to not have an 800 page policy document for every issue, but people do want to know that she has a plan. Trump may not seem like he has a plan to us (because he doesn’t) but the average young voter doesn’t really get that from my experience. They hear him pay lip service to the actual economic issues in the country and think that means something.
The bigger issue is the double standard that our legacy media has in terms of pressing Harris and Trump. They hold Harris to such a higher standard for policy and rail against any policies she has proposed that are slightly left of center.
No but they should position themselves as a reformer. And not a cute incremental reformer, a serious reformer.So they should appeal to the chaos crowd?
It's not a contradiction. Young people don't want the details of anything generally. They want simple economic messaging. Trump still pays lip service to the economic populism that won him the 2016 election while Harris seems to be trying to distance herself from some of the more economically populist aspects of the Biden administration.So this group of young people don't "get" that Trump doesn't have a plan but want details of Harris' plans? You seem to be contradicting yourself in what these young people want.
Chaos is a ladder...So they should appeal to the chaos crowd?
I thought it was the "failing NY Times"?Fake polls! Only NYT matters
They 100% did. That's why folks have been digging into it and finding some big flaws. The evangelical % is ridiculous. What on earth has happened across the NYT over the last decade????47% in the NYT poll say Harris is too progressive. 9% says she is not progressive enough.
Sounds like they talked to a lot of Republicans.
Didn't they just release more details though?Not a new poll — same one they released at the beginning of September.
New analysis but the top line numbers are still the same they previously reported based on now slightly stale data.Didn't they just release more details though?
I figure it's a continuation of the Times-Biden feud that's been going on for 5+ years. As you'd expect, there's been some petty bullshit on both sides but I come down mostly on Biden's side of things. This is a pretty good look at it.They 100% did. That's why folks have been digging into it and finding some big flaws. The evangelical % is ridiculous. What on earth has happened across the NYT over the last decade????
That’s as good a guess as anything. The Times is really compromising its reputation with its coverage of this election.I figure it's a continuation of the Times-Biden feud that's been going on for 5+ years. As you'd expect, there's been some petty bullshit on both sides but I come down mostly on Biden's side of things. This is a pretty good look at it.
Seems unlikely to me Nate Cohn would knowingly sanction a poll with obviously slanted sampling.That’s as good a guess as anything. The Times is really compromising its reputation with its coverage of this election.
Nate's always been in the "well you release what you get and it evens out over time" kind of mindset. Which is fair...but also why one poll can just seem soooo off. Polls never were supposed to be a media story (not a singular poll). But alas....Seems unlikely to me Nate Cohn would knowingly sanction a poll with obviously slanted sampling.