I hear you. I had my “connections” in the 1970’s/80’s. Dangerous in several forms, but what it’s “cut” with - or not cut - can be an issue. Rhythm changes in the heart can develop quickly. See: Len Bias 1986
And wouldn’t it be cool if there was a phone that stayed in the house that the entire family could use when needed
They used to be but that guy got fired
But a Russian bot may not check that
Do tell... I'll tell you the joke later. PM me.
Fracking, perhaps?
deadline.com
Нет, он имеет в виду Криса Лихта.“Republicans Are Back On The Air” On CNN, Cheers Warner Bros. Discovery Chief David Zaslav
The chief executive of the news network's parent company said a major push continues to shift its perception as "left leaning."
Google Search
www.google.com
This guy?
The events of this campaign year have convinced me that a majority of the so-called news media in this country want Trump to win this election, including the fabled "mainstream liberal media" that conservatives so love to attack and see themselves as victims of. The NY Times, WaPo, CNN, etc. all seem to be bending over backwards to give Dear Leader almost every benefit of the doubt, bosiding everything to death, and practicing a definite double standard with Harris. And that's without mentioning all of the right-wing media that now exists in this country - Fox, OAN, Newsmax, most talk radio, all of the local TV stations owned by Sinclair media, Politico, realclearpolitics, the WaPo choosing a former Murdoch employee to manage the paper, and so on.
Biden made the presidency boring again.
Yep. Gotta keep those ratings and subscriptions and website hits up, even if the country and our democracy go down the tubes. There was an article earlier this year on how much of the East Coast legacy media, like the NY Times, simply doesn't believe that a second Trump term will be a threat to them personally, so they don't care.
Yes. I started a thread on the old board about “When will the media quit Bo-siding? (and call out Trump)”
The media loves a tight race. Sort of like in the NCAA tournament when dook is playing SE Utah State, some commentator will try to hype the chances of SE Utah State pulling off the upset. Most people don't like a blowout (UNC wins, notwithstanding). The media is simply trying to keep people interested, IMHO.
Perhaps, but SE Utah State isn't going to wreck our democracy or go after vulnerable groups of people if they win the game. I know the media loves a tight race, but that doesn't justify the endless bosiding, downplaying of GOP threats and rhetoric and actions, or articles in the Times like "Trump Can Win on Character." The reason the media wants a tight race is to keep up ratings and website hits, and that's why they also likely want Trump to win the race - if he wins he'll be great for ratings and subscriptions and website hits. As for the damage he might cause to the country and government they don't care.
Like with CNN and others... do you think it's also the ultimate "owners" of the print, broadcast and cable media outlets - who want to get clicks, sell ads or otherwise see their bottom line, their personal taxes reduced and their stock options increase in value? This along with feeding the fire and the frenzy of a horse-race and not a blowout. (Again, to gain clicks and sell ads, of course).
You have quite the flair for the dramatic. Impressive.
