Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

2024 Presidential Election | ELECTION DAY 2024

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 8K
  • Views: 287K
  • Politics 

Trump has far less campaign money and infrastructure than Harris​

The former president’s campaign infrastructure is smaller than Harris’ — and his own from 2020.

“… Now that lead is gone, and Trump has also lost the cash advantage he once held over Biden. Boosted by record fundraising, the vice president’s campaign reported nearly $220 million in cash on hand at the end of July, compared to $151 million for Trump.

A major question now is how Trump’s operation will scale up its spending in the pivotal final sprint to Election Day.

… [In July 2020], his campaign committee and the Republican National Committee also had a combined nearly 800 staffers on payroll, according to a POLITICO analysis of FEC data.

This July, the Trump campaign and the RNC had just over 300 staffers on payroll, FEC filings show. Meanwhile, the Harris campaign and the Democratic National Committee had a combined roughly 1,100 staffers last month. …”
 
Supposedly, Trump was super-intrigued about having Kennedy as his VP back in 2023 — apparently mainly because he lived the idea of Trump/Kennedy logos but at the time also thought Kennedy would pull a lot of young Dems.
 
I moved on at 64. One of the reasons people stick around is access to health insurance. Once people are Medicare eligible at 65 most will retire unless they made lousy financial choices. My wife would retire tomorrow if she could get Medicare. I am an advocate for “Medicare for all” but as an interim measure I would like to see anyone 50+ able to buy in to Medicare for <$300 per month. Then you’d start to see people leaving their jobs.
That’s not a bad suggestion. Kind of a bridge to full Medicare. I know several people in the boat your wife is in. Best of luck to her.
 
Right?! Boomers across the board just don't let go :)
Well this boomer did. Born in 1959. Retired early, 8 years ago at age 57. Now I just play jazz gigs on the weekends (with a few winery gigs on certain Thursday afternoons) 😎
I am well outta the way of all you young bucks, and you’re more than welcome on my lawn - as long as you mow it, and weed-eat gently around the old ladies flower beds.
 
Well this boomer did. Born in 1959. Retired early, 8 years ago at age 57. Now I just play jazz gigs on the weekends (with a few winery gigs on certain Thursday afternoons) 😎
I am well outta the way of all you young bucks, and you’re more than welcome on my lawn - as long as you mow it, and weed-eat gently around the old ladies flower beds.
were not worthy waynes world GIF

You, good sir, are my hero!
 
I think it's a fairly natural outcome of both lengthened life spans including increased health outcomes for older folks and the rise of predominantly intellectual jobs as a mass of jobs.

If you're in good to great health, foresee living a couple more decades, enjoy what you do, and are physically/mentally able to keep doing it...why retire just because the calendar says you're 65 (or 70 or 75 or whatever)? Or even if you're only in decent health and only foresee living another decade, why not keep doing your job if you love it?

I do think that companies are going to have to figure out (and I think many already are) how to move folks out of the highest management roles, though, and into something more like vision/leadership/SME roles in order to ensure that they have a sustainable management succession plan.
My boss, 70, is semi-retiring and will just be doing half time work on one big project, while I’ll be taking over for him managing our department. This plan has been in the works for nearly 2 years! Guy didn’t really want to give it up.
 
Back
Top