CallMeTyler
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 603
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
IDK. Just look at all the democratic systems out in the world that have a 60% vote threshold to make new laws.Lmao at the notion that the fucking filibuster is the “Holy Grail of democracy.” FOH man.
What kind of coffee does he drink?
Manchin was responsible for getting a lot of democratic policies made into law and a lot of democratic judges appointed to the bench. Everyone of those 51/50 votes had Manchin to thank. Considering the alternative to Manchin from W.Va, Democrats were hugely fortunate to have him in the senate.Lolol Manchin was never ever going to endorse Harris, and most likely wasn’t going to vote for her, anyway. Fuck off into retirement and obscurity, old man.
Lmao at the notion that the fucking filibuster is the “Holy Grail of democracy.” FOH man.
Yeah. It’s just frustrating that the Constitution includes so many other checks and balances as it stands, yet the minority party still has veto power over widely supported legislation. Seems unnecessary at best and obstructive at worst, which is why most U.S. states and most other Democratic countries do not allow their legislators to filibuster.IDK. Just look at all the democratic systems out in the world that have a 60% vote threshold to make new laws.
Fair points, for sure.Manchin was responsible for getting a lot of democratic policies made into law and a lot of democratic judges appointed to the bench. Everyone of those 51/50 votes had Manchin to thank. Considering the alternative to Manchin from W.Va, Democrats were hugely fortunate to have him in the senate.
A bad Democrat is worth more than a good Republican in such an evenly divided and tribal senate.
OK but we don't. And leaving aside the issue of which makes more sense as a vote threshold for legislation, 50% or 60%, having a 60% threshold for taking a vote and a 50% threshold for something passing is idiotic. No sane person thinks the Senate, or Congress as a whole, functions well at the moment. it is a system designed to get nothing done; one that prevents us from passing legislation meant to address difficult issues facing the country. And now that the administrative state is getting dismantled, that's going to be an even bigger issue.IDK. Just look at all the democratic systems out in the world that have a 60% vote threshold to make new laws.
I was being sarcastic. You'd be hard pressed to find someone who despises the filibuster more than I do. As much, maybe, but I'm pretty sure my filibuster hate is at the maximum, or close at least.OK but we don't. And leaving aside the issue of which makes more sense as a vote threshold for legislation, 50% or 60%, having a 60% threshold for taking a vote and a 50% threshold for something passing is idiotic. No sane person thinks the Senate, or Congress as a whole, functions well at the moment. it is a system designed to get nothing done; one that prevents us from passing legislation meant to address difficult issues facing the country. And now that the administrative state is getting dismantled, that's going to be an even bigger issue.
Gotcha - sorry, I didn't detect the sarcasm.I was being sarcastic. You'd be hard pressed to find someone who despises the filibuster more than I do. As much, maybe, but I'm pretty sure my filibuster hate is at the maximum, or close at least.
And I'm not aware of ANY democratic systems that have a higher threshold than 50%+1, except as to special votes like constitutional amendments and the like. The 60% threshold is, to my knowledge, unique to the U.S. Senate (and perhaps some states that have aped it).
The easiest way to demolish Manchin's argument, though, is to point to reconciliation. If the filibuster is so great, why did the Senate have to make an exception for the most important stuff it does?
A bad Democrat is worth more than a good Republican in such an evenly divided and tribal senate.
That example always makes me cringe. McCain's objection wasn't to the substance of the bill. He didn't like the way it was pushed through the Senate. In particular, he didn't like that his committee had been excluded. And the fact that Trump insulted him probably didn't help matters. But it was not a principled stand.
Here is the graphical representation. One white Wyoming vote compared to other states.I would be fine with the filibuster if the Senate actually represented America more fairly.
The 49 GOP senator represent 150 million Americans while the 51 Democratic senators represent 204 million.
Land over people simply has to be fixed somehow. A vote in wyoming is worth a hell of a lot more than a vote in California and that is just not right. Particularly when California pays for all the red states.
It's still a bad idea no matter what. It's based on the fiction that the Senate is some great deliberative body. Maybe that was true at one point (again, doubtful), but that time was fairly long ago.I would be fine with the filibuster if the Senate actually represented America more fairly.
agree. just pointing out that even a 50/50 vote already greatly skews toward the GOP because of the senate representation problem.It's still a bad idea no matter what. It's based on the fiction that the Senate is some great deliberative body. Maybe that was true at one point (again, doubtful), but that time was fairly long ago.
I would be less opposed to the filibuster if it was used only to block monumental changes without more than bare consensus. You know, the way it used to be deployed -- for exceptional circumstances only. Give the minority party one filibuster per year.
One of its worst effects is the way it clouds responsibility in our environment. To those of us who follow politics, we understand that there's not really a Senate majority without 60 votes. But you constantly hear American voters saying things like, "the Dems had control for two whole years and they did nothing with it." Well, they had a majority but they didn't have control. Explaining that to people who don't follow politics is excruciating. In fact, even explaining it to people who do follow politics can be maddening. I can't count the number of times I've had to remind my mother that stuff doesn't get done because it takes 60 votes, except for reconciliation.