I don’t think it’s moral to prosecute your political opponents. I don’t think it’s moral to define everything based on race and gender. I don’t think it’s moral to let the fascist/threat to democracy narrative with Trump get so out of control that you said we need to put a bullseye on him and a week later there was an assassination attempt on his life. I. I don’t think it’s moral to tell the country the president is fine mentally and keep the charade up until half the country is “shocked” when it’s revealed on national television that he’s a vegetable.
If you want anyone to take you seriously, you've got to retract some of this BS. It's outright ridiculous.
1. Prosecuting political opponents BECAUSE they are political opponents is bad. Prosecuting political opponents because they committed crimes is not bad. Otherwise, it gives an incentive -- one that Trump took up gleefully -- for criminals to run for office and then not have to worry about prosecution. Also, it's bad for rule of law for the leader of a party to get carte blanche just because he's a leader of a political party.
Ask yourself: did Trump have national security documents; did he give them back when asked; did he give them back in response to a subpoena; did he instruct his attorneys to lie about giving them back in response to the subpoena; did he actively hide the documents to cover for the fact that he didn't give them back?
If the answers are (all of these need only be answered in terms of probably) yes, no, no, yes, yes, then he has to be prosecuted. Because he would be a dangerous criminal if that was true. Do the same thing for January 6, for his phone call with Raffensberger, his fake elector scheme. It's mind-boggling to think that it's "immoral" to prosecute the guy.
Oh, and Trump is not Jack Smith's political opponent.
2. If it's immoral to define everything in terms of race and gender, then why do you folks do it all the time? Every time anyone calls Kamala a "DEI hire" they are making it about race. Kamala isn't doing that. YOU are doing that. YOU are asserting, implicitly, that her race and gender are the only reasons why she is here. That's YOU. And of course don't get started on trans. For someone who doesn't make everything about gender, you sure talk about it a lot (including in the very same sentence).
3. The assassination attempt had nothing to do with allegations that Trump is a fascist and you know it. The guy was a school shooter who decided to think bigger. And if you don't like terminology like "fascism," then don't be a fascist. I mean, seriously, learn what it is. Then you will see that it describes the GOP.
4. The "vegetable" somehow managed to get the hostages freed while he had Covid, while he was thinking about stepping aside. He's never been a vegetable. He's perfectly capable of doing his job, as evidenced by the fact that HE IS DOING HIS JOB, AND WELL.
After Trump lost in 2020, he basically ignored the job of the presidency. He was laser focused on stealing the election. He started replacing all his cabinet members. He completely ignored the vaccine distribution. Biden could have done that, but instead he's focused on being a good president for the remainder of his term.
Again, we know that Biden is capable of doing the job BECAUSE HE IS DOING THE JOB WELL.