2024 Presidential Election | ELECTION DAY 2024

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 8K
  • Views: 289K
  • Politics 
Probably because Democrats take every chance they can to call Trump a threat to democracy, so it’s hilarious the power brokers called the shots and subverted the primary system to put up the candidate that can win.
Who the fuck cares about the primary system? The primary system is how you get demagogues like Trump. The whole way we pick candidates and organize elections in this country needs to be overhauled. No other democracy has a year+ election process. What needs to happen:

- Fundraising may begin in April
- Ads for primaries May
- All primaries held on a single day in July with ranked choice voting for nominees
- Conventions abolished
- 3 Nationally funded debates in August, Sept, and Oct with participation mandatory for ballot access. Any party nominee getting at least 10% in a recognized polling average allowed to participate.
 
Who the fuck cares about the primary system? The primary system is how you get demagogues like Trump. The whole way we pick candidates and organize elections in this country needs to be overhauled. No other democracy has a year+ election process. What needs to happen:

- Fundraising may begin in April
- Ads for primaries May
- All primaries held on a single day in July with ranked choice voting for nominees
- Conventions abolished
- 3 Nationally funded debates in August, Sept, and Oct with participation mandatory for ballot access. Any party nominee getting at least 10% in a recognized polling average allowed to participate.
You definitely have forgotten more about the law than I’ve ever known.

That said, I don’t see much you’re proposing that would hold up - some would lose court challenges; others would depend on voluntary compliance; some give huge advantages to the candidates with the most name recognition and/or the candidates most aligned with billionaires.

A one-day primary? With fundraising to only begin in April? How do candidates get on the ballot? In 50 states?

Why have a debate in August? Most Americans don’t pay attention until after Labor Day.
 
IMG_2348.jpeg

IMG_2347.jpeg
In case anyone doubts the crowd size thing is bothering him …

He followed this stuff with posting a bunch of favorable articles from July (about the time of the RNC convention/before Joe withdrew) …
 
One thing that I think people are under appreciatting is the timing of the momentum swing. For a lot of folks here in the Midwest, the months of late June through early August are a slog. Not only is it beastly hot outside, but a lot of the usual entertainment isn't present. In a typical year, the only major sport happening routinely is baseball. Things that happen in that time period typically get more attention simply because there's not much else happening. That, however, was not the case this year.

While Biden was clearly struggling and then came the debate performance debacle, it wasn't the only major story. It may have felt like it, but so much else was happening: the Euros, Copa America, and the build up to and eventual start of the Olympics. They were a distraction from politics at the best time.

Then, right as most of those big things finished...Biden dropped out. It instantly became the biggest news story and, with little to block it out, it stayed there. And then, came Kamala. The momentum built over three weeks, perfectly timing with the unity, positivity, and joy brought on by the Olympics. It rose again in the past few days with the selection of Walz, and it will soon peak at the DNC. Kamala's perfectly timed rise right in middle of the summer dead period allowed her visibility to skyrocket, putting her in prominence in the minds of many. However, people are rightly beginning to worry the momentum will dim.

I'm sorry to say that it will undoubtedly dim, but not for the reasons you may think. It will dim, but that's the best possible thing that could happen (in the Midwest, at least).

This is because in people's minds she will represent that joy, optimism, and hope. That's what they will remember as their minds switch from the doldrums of summer to the excitement of fall that brings the key player in this tale: the start of football season, and more specifically college football season.

Football season dominates all, whether it's politics, other sports, or general entertainment. Especially in the Midwest. In the minds of those Midwestern voters, 95% have already made their voting decision. Football season is sacred, and only the biggest of impactful stories will break into their news cycle. And it will run all the way past the election. So for those worried about momentum fading, don't. For once football kicks off in those states, just avoiding pitfalls is all you need to do.
Well put. Only thing I’ll add is that Walz has a personality that is instantly recognizable in the Midwest. People won’t need to be locked into the campaign to see him as the sort of goofy Midwestern dad that gets a kick out of embarrassing the family at Denny’s with moons over my hammy jokes.
 
You definitely have forgotten more about the law than I’ve ever known.

That said, I don’t see much you’re proposing that would hold up - some would lose court challenges; others would depend on voluntary compliance; some give huge advantages to the candidates with the most name recognition and/or the candidates most aligned with billionaires.

A one-day primary? With fundraising to only begin in April? How do candidates get on the ballot? In 50 states?

Why have a debate in August? Most Americans don’t pay attention until after Labor Day.
I don’t doubt that some of it would require things as drastic as constitutional amendments, especially with the current judiciary. Shortening the election season helps with the fundraising issue. Less time to air ads means less money needs to be spent meaning less needs to be raised. I’d also ban PACs, corporate contributions, and limit the total contribution any person can make for a single election cycle. It’s not so much a legislative proposal as it is a “if I were building this from scratch how would I do it?” European countries can go from an election not even being on the calendar to holding the election in six weeks. As it stands, 50% of a member of Congress’ term and 25%+ of a POTUS term is spent campaigning rather than governing because our election cycles are entirely too long. That’s a giant waste of time.
 
I can see his inner circle in that conversation: “mein fuhrer, the Kamabla spelling error turned insult has not landed with the general public, and in fact has caused them to double down on calling it and us WEIRD. We recommend we find another attack to use. Crazy Kamala has continued to NOT trend negatively, so that should be your go-to now. “
Do people still do those videos where they caption Hitler's tirade from the movie Downfall?
 
That’s a giant waste of time.
It's worse than a giant waste of time. It means that there are tiny windows of time where anything can get done.

Our election system, like so much else in our politics, has grown to become a will of its own.

In fairness, those European countries don't have 50 states to organize.
 
Probably because Democrats take every chance they can to call Trump a threat to democracy, so it’s hilarious the power brokers called the shots and subverted the primary system to put up the candidate that can win.
If only there were some opportunity, say... I dunno... in November, to express their displeasure with the Democratic candidate for president. They can still write in Joe Biden if they're so inclined.

Conflating Trump's role in Jan. 6 to disrupt the peaceful transition of power after a free and fair election with replacing a candidate ON A BALLOT for whom people can choose to vote or not vote is such a bad faith equivalence.
 
If only there were some opportunity, say... I dunno... in November, to express their displeasure with the Democratic candidate for president. They can still write in Joe Biden if they're so inclined.

Conflating Trump's role in Jan. 6 to disrupt the peaceful transition of power after a free and fair election with replacing a candidate ON A BALLOT for whom people can choose to vote or not vote is such a bad faith equivalence.
"Good faith" has never been the goal of Trump voters.
 
Back
Top