lawtig02
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,511
Believing in the rights of unborn fetuses is not stupid per se. Personhood is a legal/philosophical concept about which reasonable people can disagree (although the burden is very much on those who would resolve that disagreement by restricting the rights of women, whose personhood is not at all in question, to prove their case, which you have not). Believing in biblical creationism as a scientific fact rather than a theologically informative myth is pretty damn stupid. You really have to set aside everything empirically provable to believe something like that. And I say that as someone who believes in a God who is manifested in the physical world.Here we go - I’m stupid because I believe in creationism and the rights of unborn children. Let me ask you this, what will that fetus become if it isn’t murdered by the woman who is supposed to be protecting it? By the way, the photo you provided is a fetus that most likely has a heart beat. I have a 1 year old child and we heard his heartbeat at 8 weeks. Only a sick and twisted individual would hear that and say “ya know what? I don’t want or need that in my life right now”. So, I’ll gladly be stupid in your eyes.
Just to be clear, you advocate for ending the life of a fetus for convenience of the mother and couch that as “human rights”?