Abortion Argument Within (f/k/a Biden to propose SCOTUS reform)

[CallMeTyler]

They’re the substitutes on the field for the starters and everyone gets a participation trophy. But it’s fine.

Is that why you followed us here after leaving IC?

You’re basically our forum bag boy.

 

[ENCHeel]

Yes, if we found biological cells on the moon we would say we’ve discovered extraterrestrial life.

Are you this level of caricature in real life?

You’re so dumb you can’t even understand the point. lol

 

[CallMeTyler]

You’re so dumb you can’t even understand the point. lol

You haven’t made a single point. You appeal to the supernatural.

And you think I’m the one looking foolish.

Is this why you got banned at IC? I expected improvement when you migrated here.

 

[Heel62695]

It’s why Trump loves the uneducated. You make easy marks.

“If you don’t get the vaccine you will”
“If you’re vaccinated you will not get sick”
“Ok get your booster and then time you really won’t get sick”
“Ok For real this time the second booster will keep you safe” (so on and so forth)
Science!
“Also if you don’t get this vaccine you should be isolated and you will lose your job. My body my choice only applies when we can use it to our advantage”
And don’t even get me started on the science that says men can be women. The party of science indeed.

 

[mpaer]

“If you don’t get the vaccine you will”
“If you’re vaccinated you will not get sick”
“Ok get your booster and then time you really won’t get sick”
“Ok For real this time the second booster will keep you safe” (so on and so forth)
Science!
“Also if you don’t get this vaccine you should be isolated and you will lose your job. My body my choice only applies when we can use it to our advantage”
And don’t even get me started on the science that says men can be women. The party of science indeed.

Are you Boo Radley?

 

[ENCHeel]

You haven’t made a single point. You appeal to the supernatural.

And you think I’m the one looking foolish.

Is this why you got banned at IC? I expected improvement when you migrated here.

I got banned from this site earlier because you guys are soft. The point is, since you missed it, you would call a 2 day old fetus on the moon “life” but not when it’s in a mother’s womb. I.e. you just make stuff up to for your narrative. Try to keep up.

 

[ENCHeel]

“If you don’t get the vaccine you will”
“If you’re vaccinated you will not get sick”
“Ok get your booster and then time you really won’t get sick”
“Ok For real this time the second booster will keep you safe” (so on and so forth)
Science!
“Also if you don’t get this vaccine you should be isolated and you will lose your job. My body my choice only applies when we can use it to our advantage”
And don’t even get me started on the science that says men can be women. The party of science indeed.

It all makes sense if you don’t question it and follow big brothers teaching!

 

[CallMeTyler]

I got banned from this site earlier because you guys are soft. The point is, since you missed it, you would call a 2 day old fetus on the moon “life” but not when it’s in a mother’s womb. I.e. you just make stuff up to for your narrative. Try to keep up.

I’ve already spoken to fetal viability. Just because you lack the ability to retain information doesn’t make your terrible analogy more profound, it simply highlights your inability to focus on a single point of contention.

 

[ENCHeel]

I’ve already spoken to fetal viability. Just because you lack the ability to retain information doesn’t make your terrible analogy more profound, it simply highlights your inability to focus on a single point of contention.

If it’s life in one place, which you admitted just now, it’s life in another place. You can’t decide when and where it isn’t life.

 

[lawtig02]

I got banned from this site earlier because you guys are soft. The point is, since you missed it, you would call a 2 day old fetus on the moon “life” but not when it’s in a mother’s womb. I.e. you just make stuff up to for your narrative. Try to keep up.

Look, you’ll just move the goalposts again, but whether a fetus is “life” is irrelevant. Nobody disputes a fetus is a collection of living cells. The relevant question is whether a fetus is a “person.” You haven’t come close to answering that question, and it’s not an answer that can be found in the Bible. It’s a legal question, possibly a philosophical question, but not a theological question. And to the extent it could be a theological question, that has no bearing on the legal/philosophical question. Now go ahead and shift those posts again.

 

[CallMeTyler]

If it’s life in one place, which you admitted just now, it’s life in another place. You can’t decide when and where it isn’t life.

The question isn’t whether it is life. The question is viability.

Nobody would suggest that cells aren’t a display of life. This gotcha is so bad I’m not sure how serious to take it.

You’re getting far more engagement than you have any right to.

 

[ENCHeel]

Look, you’ll just move the goalposts again, but whether a fetus is “life” is irrelevant. Nobody disputes a fetus is a collection of living cells. The relevant question is whether a fetus is a “person.” You haven’t come close to answering that question, and it’s not an answer that can be found in the Bible. It’s a legal question, possibly a philosophical question, but not a theological question. And to the extent it could be a theological question, that has no bearing on the legal/philosophical question. Now go ahead and shift those posts again.

It’s a person

 

[ENCHeel]

The question isn’t whether it is life. The question is viability.

Nobody would suggest that cells aren’t a display of life. This gotcha is so bad I’m not sure how serious to take it.

You’re getting far more engagement than you have any right to.

Why does viability make any difference? If it’s a life, that you must believe will turn into a human being at some later date, why is it okay to end it? Viability just seems like a made up distinction to make everyone feel better

 

[CallMeTyler]

Why does viability make any difference? If it’s a life, that you must believe will turn into a human being at some later date, why is it okay to end it? Viability just seems like a made up distinction to make everyone feel better

Damn dude, we've been through this multiple times.

If you can't bother to read, then why bother discussing at all? If you need to recall the initial argument, go back a few pages and read through my comments.

I'm not hand-holding you through this anymore.

 

[ENCHeel]

Damn dude, we've been through this multiple times.

If you can't bother to read, then why bother discussing at all? If you need to recall the initial argument, go back a few pages and read through my comments.

I'm not hand-holding you through this anymore.

I understand your argument but don’t understand why it means you can end what you have admitted is a life that will become a human being.

 

[WaynetheDrain]

Decent idea, although folks aren't considering the downsides, but it will never pass. Its election year theater.

Give us real platforms to vote on.

No it’s not theater. It won’t happen this year, but it’s important to start the conversation NOW. Because it needs to happen. Getting the debate started at least gets it normalized at some point so it can happen in the future.

SCOTUS is broken, and it needs to be fixed. Period.

 

[ENCHeel]

No it’s not theater. It won’t happen this year, but it’s important to start the conversation NOW. Because it needs to happen. Getting the debate started at least gets it normalized at some point so it can happen in the future.

SCOTUS is broken, and it needs to be fixed. Period.

It’s only broken because it did something you didn’t like. Should’ve won the 2016 election.

 

[lawtig02]

It’s a person

And this is why we roll our eyes at you. A declaratory statement about something you have not come even close to addressing is just lazy and unserious.

 

[NCK9]

Good grief. Can you guys “take it outside” or go create a roe v wade thread? This thread was supposed to be about Biden’s proposal to change the make up of the court - not specific court rulings.

 

[KishiKaisei]

What rights are threatened exactly?

You refuse to accept inferences based on Gods teaching because you are angry at Christians

“If you don’t get the vaccine you will”
“If you’re vaccinated you will not get sick”
“Ok get your booster and then time you really won’t get sick”
“Ok For real this time the second booster will keep you safe” (so on and so forth)
Science!
“Also if you don’t get this vaccine you should be isolated and you will lose your job. My body my choice only applies when we can use it to our advantage”
And don’t even get me started on the science that says men can be women. The party of science indeed.