Abortion Argument Within (f/k/a Biden to propose SCOTUS reform)

[Heel62695]

If the child's well being depends on protecting their privacy, do I agree that the state has a responsibility to do so? Yes.

My child wouldn't be afraid of my reaction or feel threatened by their outing. Would yours?

And how is it determined if a child’s well being would be threatened? Which is funny because you wouldn’t care about that child at all if it was still in the womb.

 

[tonman]

Do you believe in inalienable rights for human beings? Do you believe in global warming? Everything is legislating what you believe in.

No. Seriously. You think things like climate change is something you have to believe in order to act upon. No. You act upon climate change because the evidence points to it. You can deny the evidence. But that's an individual assertion. Legislation affects everyone. That's why I keep pushing on you, why do u feel like your beliefs should be forces on everyone? The majority of pregnancies start off as multiples. Imagine how many "lives" are lost each year. It's okay if it happens naturally. But if you have an abortion or use contraceptives..... really. God's will right. Do you go see your doctor? Why?

 

[CallMeTyler]

I’ve been discussing convenience abortions. It’s a real world example that is so rare it can be handled case by case. We can’t allow all abortions just because 5 of those occur a year

That example amplifies the mile wide holes in your faux morality position against abortion. Autonomy is the underlying principle.

Did you have trouble inferring?

 

[Zoo_View]

Do you believe in inalienable rights for human beings? Do you believe in global warming? Everything is legislating what you believe in.

Climate change is scientific fact. It’s not a “belief.”

I don’t believe in inalienable rights. It’s a cute use of words. Humans have to define their rights, take their rights, and continue to protect their rights.

 

[CallMeTyler]

And how is it determined if a child’s well being would be threatened? Which is funny because you wouldn’t care about that child at all if it was still in the womb.

It’s not a child. Just because you state it doesn’t make it so.

 

[Heel62695]

It’s not a child. Just because you state it doesn’t make it so.

Believe me I’m fine with more people like you not having children. So I support your stance.

 

[ENCHeel]

No. Seriously. You think things like climate change is something you have to believe in order to act upon. No. You act upon climate change because the evidence points to it. You can deny the evidence. But that's an individual assertion. Legislation affects everyone. That's why I keep pushing on you, why do u feel like your beliefs should be forces on everyone? The majority of pregnancies start off as multiples. Imagine how many "lives" are lost each year. It's okay if it happens naturally. But if you have an abortion or use contraceptives..... really. God's will right. Do you go see your doctor? Why?

We have inalienable rights as human beings. That’s not debatable.

 

[mpaer]

What rights are threatened exactly?

Oh Stuff like the right to marry?

 

[ENCHeel]

That example amplifies the mile wide holes in your faux morality position against abortion. Autonomy is the underlying principle.

Did you have trouble inferring?

It really doesn’t.

 

[ENCHeel]

It’s not a child. Just because you state it doesn’t make it so.

If we found a 2 day old fetus on the moon we’d say we found life on the moon.

 

[CallMeTyler]

Believe me I’m fine with more people like you not having children. So I support your stance.

Science doesn’t agree with you. Sorry Heel62695, but theology isn’t a science.

 

[Zoo_View]

You refuse to accept inferences based on Gods teaching because you are angry at Christians

He’s not angry at Christians.

I doubt he has much patience for pseudo-Christians…..particularly the American Christo-Nationalist “christians” who make up so much of the fundamentalist “christian” religion in the US today.

 

[Heel62695]

Science doesn’t agree with you. Sorry Heel62695, but theology isn’t a science.

Here we go with “the party of science stuff again” lol

 

[Heel62695]

Oh Stuff like the right to marry?

Who’s after it? Name names and post links.

 

[ENCHeel]

Here we go with “the party of science stuff again” lol

Good luck arguing with them. They don’t operate on the same playing field.

 

[CallMeTyler]

If we found a 2 day old fetus on the moon we’d say we found life on the moon.

Yes, if we found biological cells on the moon we would say we’ve discovered extraterrestrial life.

Are you this level of caricature in real life?

 

[Heel62695]

Good luck arguing with them. They don’t operate on the same playing field.

They’re the substitutes on the field for the starters and everyone gets a participation trophy. But it’s fine.

 

[CallMeTyler]

Here we go with “the party of science stuff again” lol

It’s why Trump loves the uneducated. You make easy marks.

 

[mpaer]

Who’s after it? Name names and post links.

After Roe: 9 legal experts on what rights the Supreme Court might target next

Does Justice Alito’s draft opinion hint at future rollbacks on marriage equality, birth control, and other issues?

www.vox.com

USA TODAY

Monday's decision leaves unchanged 20 state laws blocking same-sex unions.

www.usatoday.com

What Will Happen to Same-Sex Marriage Around the Country if 'Obergefell' Falls

Since Obergefell was decided, same-sex marriage bans in 35 states across the country have lain dormant.

time.com

'God formed me' to fight LGBTQ issues, NC's Mark Robinson says as 2024 governor's race looms

As he prepares for an expected campaign for governor next year, North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson continues to amp up rhetoric against gay, lesbian and transgender people that has become a key part of his political brand.

www.wral.com

 

[RockyMtnHoo]

But Democrats fill the need to control or influence everything so here we are.

You mean the way Mitch McConnell stole a seat, and then did a 180 when it benefitted his side? Or does it only count when Democrats do what he did? Oh…wait.