After Trump

[CFordUNC]

I think the impression was created by your proclivity for political trash talk. While you may never have thought Trump couldn't win, your occasionally shit-posting style didn't speak to cautious optimism.

Gotcha. Entirely possible. Hey, what’s a little shit talking amongst friends!

I am amused, though, at how many of these guys somehow have the ability to remember exactly what I post, when I post, how I post, and when I am and am not on the board for periods of time. Clearly some of these folks are still bothered or bemused by something I may have said 8, 10, 12 months ago. I find that interesting.

 

[Callatoroy]

What does running Kamala Harris in 2024 have to do with the election in 2028, which is what this conversation is about? You’re always so eager to try to get your “gotcha” that oftentimes you don’t even read or understand the context of the post to which you’re responding.

So, no, I don’t think I’ll sit this thread out, thanks. I’ll stand by my assertion that 2028 should yield a Democratic president post-Trump, as long as they are competent enough to run a candidate with fair skin, a Y chromosome, and a birthdate after 1970, for the exact reasons I stated above: the chickens of four years of disastrous economic policy, scandal, and corruption will come home to roost. And for the first time in 12 years, the Republicans won’t have Donald Trump to save them.

There was no gotcha. She was horrible in 20, beyond horrible in 24, and leading in some polls for 28. That’s what running her in 24 has to do with 28. She is still a leading candidate despite how bad she was.

 

[CFordUNC]

There was no gotcha. She was horrible in 20, beyond horrible in 24, and leading in some polls for 28. That’s what running her in 24 has to do with 28. She is still a leading candidate despite how bad she was.

I hear ya. Well, no disagreement from me there.

 

[UNCatTech]

One would think predicting elections may be on the back burner for a while for you. Let’s not forget you confidently laughed down anyone, pub or dem, who hadn’t read the tea leaves and thought Trump had a chance to win.

You ever wonder why trump was so confident that he won in 2020? Maybe because he had cheated and didn't understand how he could have still lost? So maybe he cheated again in 2024...

 

[UNCatTech]

There was no gotcha. She was horrible in 20, beyond horrible in 24, and leading in some polls for 28. That’s what running her in 24 has to do with 28. She is still a leading candidate despite how bad she was.

The thread isn't about the dems, it's about after trump. The first post asks: Who next up for the pubs?

So, stick with the topic...

 

[Tar1978Heel]

Because of corrupt federal judges from your side of the aisle.

Not my side…You seem angry…

 

[Tar1978Heel]

MAGAs: “if the embarrassing stuff is real, why didn’t Biden release it!?!?”

So you’re saying that if Biden released something, and Trump said it was fake, you would believe the Biden administration over Trump? Do I have that right?

Truth be told I think it’s a ton of powerful people with loads of money from all over the world and that includes high ranking members of governments…That’s why it was never going to see the light of day…

 

[Purple Nurple]

You have me confused with someone else, chief. I always said that while I personally thought that the Democrats and Harris would win the election, that there was always a very real chance that Trump could win. Feel free to go back and look if you are so inclined (please don’t, surely you have something way better to do on your Saturday afternoon). And considering this is a message board to talk about politics, and since making predictions is fun, and since my predictions have exactly zero effect on the outcome of anything, and because my life keeps chugging right along no matter who is in the White House, and since the sun keeps rising in the east no matter what happens, I think I’ll keep right at it! Thanks for your concern, though.

Meh, unlike you, who posted some 25 times Saturday, I don’t have the time or the inclination to run it down. I think Super’s post may point to the fact that my statement wasn’t as outlandish as you thought.

 

[CFordUNC]

Meh, unlike you, who posted some 25 times Saturday, I don’t have the time or the inclination to run it down. I think Super’s post may point to the fact that my statement wasn’t as outlandish as you thought.

Dang, hoss, you actually counted how many times I posted on Saturday? I am deeply flattered.

I’ll be honest, I don’t know what your particular beef or gripe is with me in particular, but just know that it is totally one-sided and that I love you and wish you peace and blessings, my fellow RobCo brother.