sringwal
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,490
I’d agree. At least not until he decides to actually engage in the conversation rather than simply responding with pithy soundbytes.He’s not worth the time, brother.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’d agree. At least not until he decides to actually engage in the conversation rather than simply responding with pithy soundbytes.He’s not worth the time, brother.
I’d agree. At least not until he decides to actually engage in the conversation rather than simply responding with pithy soundbytes.
I would settle for a supreme court that believes in the constitution and rule of law.I think a massively catastrophic major recession/depression that is clearly tied to Trump’s insane economic policies could really change the balance of power for a while. And that seems entirely possible.
But for long term stability, we MUST have a more balanced Supreme Court that actually believes in separation of powers and checks and balances.
It is one of our greatest threats our republic has ever faced.I'd be up for a third party whose first platform statement talks about the advertiser-driven dopamine hits given to people when they get outraged by things in their SM.
There has to be law and order, education, and modeling compassion and empathy. If Trump had been jailed and a younger version of Biden had been in office, we might have avoided what we're looking at now.In a moment of heightened (and it feels like accelerating) political extremism and violence, is there an off-ramp?
Turning the other cheek is portrayed as capitulation to naziism or communism or whatever ism even for relatively minor insults.
How do we bring down the rhetorical temperature? Or perhaps some think the question is should we do so?
The exact same day (about an hour apart in time) that Kirk was assassinated by a young man radicalized by some hatred of Kirk so intense that it led him to plan and carry out the murder, a 16-year-old boy was so thoroughly radicalized that he went through reload after reload of ammo trying to kill his classmates before turning the gun on himself. The main thing that may have limited the casualties was that he only had access to a handgun instead of a more high powered firearm.
Whatever his political or other motivations, the guy who killed Kirk followed certain behaviors of other radicalized mass murderers, including etching symbols on his bullets.
And the head of the FBI offered a frankly odd sign-off to Kirk (“we have the watch and I’ll see you in Valhalla”), that was presumably unintentionally but nonetheless eerily similar to the suicide note of the Christchurch mass killer (“I will see you all in Valhalla”). I’m willing to assume that Kash was just engaging in cosplay based on Avengers movies or maybe cobbling together tough guy bro talk he hears from marines and he is too incompetent to be aware of the Christchurch killer’s sign off.
But a guy in that position ought to be a lot more circumspect about his rhetoric.
So, what can we do? What should we do?
Can we even have a constructive dialogue about this that won’t immediately devolve into some version of Trump’s [/paraphrasing] radicals on my side are justified and radicals in the other side are evil [/end] framing?
Education must be supported from kindergarten to graduate school. We desperately need smarter people to lead us into a potentially perilous future.
Let's take better care of one another. Stop obsessing about yourself. Help your neighbor. Support and expand collective action for its ability to bring us together and get things done.
There has to be law and order, education, and modeling compassion and empathy.
In a moment of heightened (and it feels like accelerating) political extremism and violence, is there an off-ramp?
Turning the other cheek is portrayed as capitulation to naziism or communism or whatever ism even for relatively minor insults.
How do we bring down the rhetorical temperature? Or perhaps some think the question is should we do so?
The exact same day (about an hour apart in time) that Kirk was assassinated by a young man radicalized by some hatred of Kirk so intense that it led him to plan and carry out the murder, a 16-year-old boy was so thoroughly radicalized that he went through reload after reload of ammo trying to kill his classmates before turning the gun on himself. The main thing that may have limited the casualties was that he only had access to a handgun instead of a more high powered firearm.
Whatever his political or other motivations, the guy who killed Kirk followed certain behaviors of other radicalized mass murderers, including etching symbols on his bullets.
And the head of the FBI offered a frankly odd sign-off to Kirk (“we have the watch and I’ll see you in Valhalla”), that was presumably unintentionally but nonetheless eerily similar to the suicide note of the Christchurch mass killer (“I will see you all in Valhalla”). I’m willing to assume that Kash was just engaging in cosplay based on Avengers movies or maybe cobbling together tough guy bro talk he hears from marines and he is too incompetent to be aware of the Christchurch killer’s sign off.
But a guy in that position ought to be a lot more circumspect about his rhetoric.
So, what can we do? What should we do?
Can we even have a constructive dialogue about this that won’t immediately devolve into some version of Trump’s [/paraphrasing] radicals on my side are justified and radicals in the other side are evil [/end] framing?
Agreed, but I don't see any way that Democrats get back full control of the federal government anytime soon. The Supreme Court is likely locked up for the GOP for a good many years yet, there are more red than blue states which makes winning back the Senate (and especially winning a working majority) extremely difficult, and with increased gerrymandering in red states it's also getting harder for Democrats to win back control there as well.There has to be law and order, education, and modeling compassion and empathy. If Trump had been jailed and a younger version of Biden had been in office, we might have avoided what we're looking at now.
First off, Democrats need to gain full control of the federal government (and as many state governments as possible). Republicans have repeatedly shown themselves to be completely incapable of governing. The lawless Supreme Court should be expanded. Citizens United, Heller, Dobbs, presidential immunity, and other horrible decisions from this rogue court need to be quickly overturned. Fox and the conservative media sphere should be sued daily until they stop intentionally lying and defaming. Serious discussions and legislation should address immigration. "Bad hombres" have no home here. Good, hard-working folks should have a path to citizenship. Let's stabilize countries that force their citizens to migrate to the U.S.
Education must be supported from kindergarten to graduate school. We desperately need smarter people to lead us into a potentially perilous future.
Let's take better care of one another. Stop obsessing about yourself. Help your neighbor. Support and expand collective action for its ability to bring us together and get things done.
Just a start here, but you've got to walk before you can run.
They do know how to do good. They just often choose not to.“… People are foolish… they are stupid children, they have no understanding. They are skilled in doing evil, but do not know how to do good. The whole land shall be a desolation… this earth shall mourn…”
They do know how to do good. They just often choose not to.
I can only look to other times of great polarization that we made it through to the other side...
The War for Independence
The Civil War
The Civil Rights Movement
The Vietnam War
There were other lesser schisms...in fact, we've always been at odds with one another it appears as we look back over the historical record. This is one of the most telling reality checks that I get as I work in various ways in Newspaper.com.
A lot of damage, destruction, and death in our past.
I would feel much better about it if we had a President who could be a leader in the process of bringing down the temperature and reaching out for reconciliation. But I suspect even Trump supporters will admit that is not a role he will ever accept. He is an antagonist and will only make matters worse. I truly do not see an off-ramp with Trump as President, especially given the people he has chosen to surround himself with. There is not a peacemaker in this administration.