American political violence — Is there an off-ramp?

Imo, gov Cox is fanning the flames in that clip.

He’s trying so desperately to obfuscate, to avoid Sauron’s Eye, that he suggests “in this case, it does appear that it’s true” without specifying what “it” is.

Within obfuscation, the right’s leaders intentionally allow their followers to backfill narratives with dystopian views of their policy and social opponents. In this case, Cox is “confirming” the right wing fever swamps mythology. He’s doing a disservice, imo. Also, this isn’t about one person, as Cox wants to focus upon. this is an extension of violence in this country, and worldwide, driven by the reinvigoration of white identity, fear of “other” and Christian nationalism.

Yes, their are a few examples of violent people from left sympathetic groups (who should be unequivocally denounced and discredited) that have been leveraged to demonize the entirety of the pro-social left, while the right apparently gets an ideological free pass for:

Charleston
Charlottesville
Buffalo
El Paso
Evergreen
Pulse Night Club
San Bernardino
Poway
Pittsburgh
OkC
Christchurch
Sweden
Jacksonville
Allen, Tx
Oak Creek, WI
And
On
And
On


Yes, “bOTh sIdES!!” need to police their rhetoric. Yes, bosides need leaders to set non-violent examples, but only ONE SIDE dismisses the overwhelming evidence that their ideology is the underpinning of >75% of all domestic terrorism (it’s actually around 90% when you include militia and sovereign citizen violence). Not only does the right deny their complicity in the >75% of all domestic terrorism, but they use the farthest stretches of credulity, absurdity really, to pin EVERYTHING on their policy opponents.

Until the right has leaders willing to take responsibility for the violent and retributive rhetoric and actions they’ve promoted and committed, there is no middle ground. Pro-social people will continue to promote non violent resistance to fascist ideology, through pro-social actions and attempts to cooperate. ONE side has been at the negotiating table for years, the other side elected Donald Trump and the Heritage Foundation.
 
Last edited:
I think a massively catastrophic major recession/depression that is clearly tied to Trump’s insane economic policies could really change the balance of power for a while. And that seems entirely possible.

But for long term stability, we MUST have a more balanced Supreme Court that actually believes in separation of powers and checks and balances.
I would settle for a supreme court that believes in the constitution and rule of law.
 
In a moment of heightened (and it feels like accelerating) political extremism and violence, is there an off-ramp?

Turning the other cheek is portrayed as capitulation to naziism or communism or whatever ism even for relatively minor insults.

How do we bring down the rhetorical temperature? Or perhaps some think the question is should we do so?

The exact same day (about an hour apart in time) that Kirk was assassinated by a young man radicalized by some hatred of Kirk so intense that it led him to plan and carry out the murder, a 16-year-old boy was so thoroughly radicalized that he went through reload after reload of ammo trying to kill his classmates before turning the gun on himself. The main thing that may have limited the casualties was that he only had access to a handgun instead of a more high powered firearm.

Whatever his political or other motivations, the guy who killed Kirk followed certain behaviors of other radicalized mass murderers, including etching symbols on his bullets.

And the head of the FBI offered a frankly odd sign-off to Kirk (“we have the watch and I’ll see you in Valhalla”), that was presumably unintentionally but nonetheless eerily similar to the suicide note of the Christchurch mass killer (“I will see you all in Valhalla”). I’m willing to assume that Kash was just engaging in cosplay based on Avengers movies or maybe cobbling together tough guy bro talk he hears from marines and he is too incompetent to be aware of the Christchurch killer’s sign off.

But a guy in that position ought to be a lot more circumspect about his rhetoric.

So, what can we do? What should we do?

Can we even have a constructive dialogue about this that won’t immediately devolve into some version of Trump’s [/paraphrasing] radicals on my side are justified and radicals in the other side are evil [/end] framing?
There has to be law and order, education, and modeling compassion and empathy. If Trump had been jailed and a younger version of Biden had been in office, we might have avoided what we're looking at now.

First off, Democrats need to gain full control of the federal government (and as many state governments as possible). Republicans have repeatedly shown themselves to be completely incapable of governing. The lawless Supreme Court should be expanded. Citizens United, Heller, Dobbs, presidential immunity, and other horrible decisions from this rogue court need to be quickly overturned. Fox and the conservative media sphere should be sued daily until they stop intentionally lying and defaming. Serious discussions and legislation should address immigration. "Bad hombres" have no home here. Good, hard-working folks should have a path to citizenship. Let's stabilize countries that force their citizens to migrate to the U.S.

Education must be supported from kindergarten to graduate school. We desperately need smarter people to lead us into a potentially perilous future.

Let's take better care of one another. Stop obsessing about yourself. Help your neighbor. Support and expand collective action for its ability to bring us together and get things done.

Just a start here, but you've got to walk before you can run.
 
Education must be supported from kindergarten to graduate school. We desperately need smarter people to lead us into a potentially perilous future.

Let's take better care of one another. Stop obsessing about yourself. Help your neighbor. Support and expand collective action for its ability to bring us together and get things done.
There has to be law and order, education, and modeling compassion and empathy.
(y)
 

The governor also said he could not “emphasize enough the damage that social media and the internet is doing to all of us.” Powerful companies “have figured out how to hack our brains, get us addicted to outrage,” he added.

Cox urged people to use their own agency to move the country away from the brink, rather than waiting for a political figure to show the path forward.

“People keep waiting for somebody to lead us out of this. And I think that’s a mistake,” Cox said. “I don’t think any one person, certainly not a governor, I don’t think a president, I don’t think anyone can change the trajectory of this. It truly is about every single one of us.”

“But again, I don’t know why we feel like we need to take our cues, that we as Americans have to get up in the morning and decide how we’re going to react or act based on what the president says, or what a governor says, or what anyone else says,” Cox said.
 
Every day is an opportunity to take the off-ramp from rising political violence in our country. The question is not "if" we'll have the opportunity, the question is "Will we take it?"

I essentially see no way that said off-ramp will be taken in the near to medium-term future barring an outlier event that somehow completely resets the political discussion in this country.

The Republican Party has made it clear that they want political violence as long as the victims are immigrants, people of color, the LGBTQ community, academics...essentially anyone outside the Republican Party. Appeals to and justification for political violence against minorities and Dems is functionally written into the DNA of the Republican Party at this point and it will take either an outlier event of unfathomable significance or a lot of work over a long time for the Republican Party to reform their party.

The Democratic Party has tried taking the "adults in the room" approach during Trump's first term in office and we all know that it accomplished nothing of great value. In response, there is now a rising movement within the Democratic Party to meet the political violence of the right with a willingness to engage in political violence - at least at a verbal or potential level - from the left.

I believe that Super's "prisoner's dilemma" theory is essentially correct at this point, with the caveat that one of the prisoners has a grudge against the other and is more than willing to go to prison himself as long as the other prisoner serves as long of a sentence as possible.

I really have no idea how we get out of our current situation except hope to keep the damage as limited as possible and that something happens to pull us back from the brink.
 
In a moment of heightened (and it feels like accelerating) political extremism and violence, is there an off-ramp?

Turning the other cheek is portrayed as capitulation to naziism or communism or whatever ism even for relatively minor insults.

How do we bring down the rhetorical temperature? Or perhaps some think the question is should we do so?

The exact same day (about an hour apart in time) that Kirk was assassinated by a young man radicalized by some hatred of Kirk so intense that it led him to plan and carry out the murder, a 16-year-old boy was so thoroughly radicalized that he went through reload after reload of ammo trying to kill his classmates before turning the gun on himself. The main thing that may have limited the casualties was that he only had access to a handgun instead of a more high powered firearm.

Whatever his political or other motivations, the guy who killed Kirk followed certain behaviors of other radicalized mass murderers, including etching symbols on his bullets.

And the head of the FBI offered a frankly odd sign-off to Kirk (“we have the watch and I’ll see you in Valhalla”), that was presumably unintentionally but nonetheless eerily similar to the suicide note of the Christchurch mass killer (“I will see you all in Valhalla”). I’m willing to assume that Kash was just engaging in cosplay based on Avengers movies or maybe cobbling together tough guy bro talk he hears from marines and he is too incompetent to be aware of the Christchurch killer’s sign off.

But a guy in that position ought to be a lot more circumspect about his rhetoric.

So, what can we do? What should we do?

Can we even have a constructive dialogue about this that won’t immediately devolve into some version of Trump’s [/paraphrasing] radicals on my side are justified and radicals in the other side are evil [/end] framing?


Just realized that I was looking too far down the road with my response.

ASAP the guilty perpetrators of January 6 must be fully punished. All of them, especially the commanders, planners, and plotters.

It is interesting to imagine whether or not we would be where we are today if Nixon had been made to stand trial and if convicted, suffer the punishment.
 
I would like to see 85% of the eligible voters vote
Now I may be sorely disappointed at the outcome-but can we play Democracy please ?
Today the President etc gets elected by winning something like 25% of eligible voters
 
There has to be law and order, education, and modeling compassion and empathy. If Trump had been jailed and a younger version of Biden had been in office, we might have avoided what we're looking at now.

First off, Democrats need to gain full control of the federal government (and as many state governments as possible). Republicans have repeatedly shown themselves to be completely incapable of governing. The lawless Supreme Court should be expanded. Citizens United, Heller, Dobbs, presidential immunity, and other horrible decisions from this rogue court need to be quickly overturned. Fox and the conservative media sphere should be sued daily until they stop intentionally lying and defaming. Serious discussions and legislation should address immigration. "Bad hombres" have no home here. Good, hard-working folks should have a path to citizenship. Let's stabilize countries that force their citizens to migrate to the U.S.

Education must be supported from kindergarten to graduate school. We desperately need smarter people to lead us into a potentially perilous future.

Let's take better care of one another. Stop obsessing about yourself. Help your neighbor. Support and expand collective action for its ability to bring us together and get things done.

Just a start here, but you've got to walk before you can run.
Agreed, but I don't see any way that Democrats get back full control of the federal government anytime soon. The Supreme Court is likely locked up for the GOP for a good many years yet, there are more red than blue states which makes winning back the Senate (and especially winning a working majority) extremely difficult, and with increased gerrymandering in red states it's also getting harder for Democrats to win back control there as well.

As for education, as long as we allow vast amounts of public school money to be diverted to vouchers, allow parents (no matter how unqualified) to either homeschool their kids with a fundamentalist, anti-science curriculum or send them to a fundamentalist "Christian" private school for the same purpose, then that's not going to improve anytime soon either. I don't mean to be pessimistic, but I don't see those things happening, at least not in my lifetime.
 
“… People are foolish… they are stupid children, they have no understanding. They are skilled in doing evil, but do not know how to do good. The whole land shall be a desolation… this earth shall mourn…”
 
“… People are foolish… they are stupid children, they have no understanding. They are skilled in doing evil, but do not know how to do good. The whole land shall be a desolation… this earth shall mourn…”
They do know how to do good. They just often choose not to.
 
I can only look to other times of great polarization that we made it through to the other side...

The War for Independence
The Civil War
The Civil Rights Movement
The Vietnam War

There were other lesser schisms...in fact, we've always been at odds with one another it appears as we look back over the historical record. This is one of the most telling reality checks that I get as I work in various ways in Newspaper.com.

A lot of damage, destruction, and death in our past.
💯
 
I would feel much better about it if we had a President who could be a leader in the process of bringing down the temperature and reaching out for reconciliation. But I suspect even Trump supporters will admit that is not a role he will ever accept. He is an antagonist and will only make matters worse. I truly do not see an off-ramp with Trump as President, especially given the people he has chosen to surround himself with. There is not a peacemaker in this administration.
💯
 
Back
Top