Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 31.2% in 2023 stands out and wasn’t good, but the other numbers aren’t too far off from the norm over the past 20+ years and better than quite a few years. If you go back before the years you cited, from 2005-2021, here are the numbers:Team 3P shooting:
2022 35.8%
2023 31.2%
2024 35.9%
2025 35.6%
Just not a lot of good or efficient shooters in 4 years. So when players who are supposed to be good shooters aren’t it stands out
I believe RJ, Manek, Ingram, Ian, and Love jr year are the only players to shoot it >36% on 3+ 3PA
Drake and Withers 5th yr the only players at >36% on 2+ 3PA
If Withers is like the 5th best shooter you can point to that really speaks to the shooting struggles
It's not a question of significance; it's a question of whether it's just a statistical artefact.That’s why when you’re shooting near or at that very-difficult-to-attain level, every whole percentage point is pretty significant.
I don't watch or follow baseball at all, so unfortunately I can't address that analogy.It's not a question of significance; it's a question of whether it's just a statistical artefact.
Suppose a baseball player is a career .274 hitter. He hits .307 one year. Would that change your perception of him as a hitter? Or did he just have a good year? He's probably still a .274-.280 hitter.
Well yeah. I wasn’t arguing against that point. Had he played one more season, he may have shot 35% or worse. Or maybe he would have continued to improve prove his percentage. Who knows? My point was simply that he was an example of a player whose 3pt % did not decline after transferring to UNC, and in fact, it improved. And I think your point goes both ways, as other players may come to UNC and see their percentage drop despite their shooting “ability” essentially being what it was previously.OK, think like this. Steph Curry's shooting from 2012 to his injury is as follows (3 point %): 45.3%, 42.4, 44.3, 45.4, 41.1, 42.3, 43.7. There are multiple 2 or 3 point jumps in there. Do we think that Steph's ability changed meaningfully, or is this just normal variation in relatively small sample sizes (even the NBA season is about 80 games)? He was shooting 600 3s in some of those years so in terms of shots, the sample size is much bigger than Manek.
Point is: maybe Manek improved, but odds are that it was just normal variation around his mean.
The 31.2% in 2023 stands out and wasn’t good, but the other numbers aren’t too far off from the norm over the past 20+ years and better than quite a few years. If you go back before the years you cited, from 2005-2021, here are the numbers:
So our average team 3pt% between 2005 and 2021 was .352, which is lower than 2022, 2024, and 2025. So those years really aren’t bad comparatively. If you look at the 2025 % of .356 (the second lowest after the 2023 %), we had 8 seasons between 2005 and 2021 (nearly half) where we shot a worse %. We had only 3 seasons where we shot better than that by 2% or more.