Congress Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 656
  • Views: 23K
  • Politics 


IMG_4095.jpeg



Musk tries to claim a victory — even though Trump did not get the only thing he wanted (debt ceiling relief).
 
You might be cf's twin brother.

So evil billionaire who is leading the way away from fossil fuels, supports free speech so much that he bought a social media platform because it was guilty of censorship, and wants to eliminate wasteful g'ment spending. Damn, he needs to be shot. Face it, you are just angry because he supports all the things you, as a liberal are supposed to support, but secretly don't unless it agrees with your pov.
Musk, leading the way away from fossil fuels? By supporting 'drill-baby-drill' Trump and supporting the AfD in Germany?
 
Last edited:
Neither party has been fiscally responsible in 50 years. The one party that came close was the dems.

Musk and trump don't care about government spending, they just want to figure out how to ensure that the government makes their net worth increase.

The last time there was a balanced budget congress was controlled by pubs. They forced bill to play ball.
That doesn't seem to apply to trump and elon has enough that he good. But getting rich does apply to some presidents.
 
Were you not in support of government overpaying to stay at trump properties? Is that not pork, or is that how you like your pork?

Pork isn't the biggest issue in this country.
The US could cut 100% of pork spending and that’ll amount to a hill of beans in comparison to the deficit.

Pretty certain we could cut 100% of “discretionary” spending and we’d still run a deficit.

“Discretionary” spending includes CDC, FAA, NIH, FBI, DEA, ATF, CIA, NSA, NOAA, NASA, FDA, TSA, Smithsonian, NPS, etc.
 

The last time there was a balanced budget congress was controlled by pubs. They forced bill to play ball.
That doesn't seem to apply to trump and elon has enough that he good. But getting rich does apply to some presidents.
I assumme the pubs will cut some stuff-on the edges. And cut taxes a bit more. The net-Net will be More debt A good bit more
I don't worry about that so much-compared to the shit show in foreign policy
 
If the bill is not available, how do you know the pork was cut?
If you and I are going to converse in good faith then you need to cut the bs lawyer act. I have tried to answer you in good faith. It's kind of hard to cram 1500 pages of spending into 115 pages so I'm relying on common sense and the fact that much of what was objected to wouldn't still be there if it was passed. Hoping you can be objective enough to give credit where credit is due and not be so partisan that all judgement is out the window. I'm not claiming that now but in light of how the events have unfolded and the damning comments made by johnson, I still don't understand how you see this as a bad thing.
 
If you and I are going to converse in good faith then you need to cut the bs lawyer act. I have tried to answer you in good faith. It's kind of hard to cram 1500 pages of spending into 115 pages so I'm relying on common sense and the fact that much of what was objected to wouldn't still be there if it was passed. Hoping you can be objective enough to give credit where credit is due and not be so partisan that all judgement is out the window. I'm not claiming that now but in light of how the events have unfolded and the damning comments made by johnson, I still don't understand how you see this as a bad thing.
he is an attorney. what is the bs lawyer act?

here's an idea. instead of telling others to be worse, why dont you raise your game?

you cant say there were cuts to spending relative to a proposed bill. that makes no sense. it is not a win any form.

cutting spending to make room for huge rich people tax cuts is not a win for anyone except the ultrarich
 
Some of the pork cut is childhood cancer research funding



 


Political malpractice. Can’t figure out how this got started - who thought this would work? Why burn political capital like this?
 
This ain’t looking good for your team, calla. Just a huge embarrassment politically for no fiscal benefit, and most of the things that were cut are overwhelmingly popular among both Dems and Pubs. This disaster will probably be forgotten after the many other disasters to come, but we can mark it down as major unforced error #1 for Trump/Musk 2.0.
 

The last time there was a balanced budget congress was controlled by pubs. They forced bill to play ball.
That doesn't seem to apply to trump and elon has enough that he good. But getting rich does apply to some presidents.
All presidents pretty much gain wealth after being president.

It's interesting that's the first I've read that trump lost money, amazing for such a great business man.

Of course one has to ask where the money went, or if he was truly worth $5B when he went into office, there were questions about his actual worth. What did his tax records show? I forget, did we ever get to see them? Wait, we did? Didn't we. They showed that he had billions in losses to report and didn't really pay the taxes he should have, didn't they? Or am I mis-remembering?


But I've read so many other articles about the amount of money that trump made, you know by forcing government planes and members to use trump properties at a greater cost than the properties they would have normally used. Now, I know that AOL has to be a standard in reporting, but I've found a few other articles about trump that really don't align.

I'm sure you are perfectly ok with all of these. You being against pork and government overspend, I'm sure you want the government to get the most from their travel budget. If you want to read more it was an easy google search. It's amazing how many hits one gets when they google "Trump" & "Crook".







 
Last edited:
Back
Top