Sounds like your Speaker knows this was a complete capitulation by the Pubs. Could have had a decent win until Trump and Elon got involved.
translation: With DOGE beginning in 2025 it is going to be harder to get our pork spending through so let's blow it out in 24 for old time's sake and we can start being fiscally responsible in 2025.
Wait, I thought you just said THIS bill cut all the pork.
Do you think either potus bush was a nazi or nazi sympathizer?
He does seem to have a fetish for going to Mars.
this bill did cut the proposed pork. spending is at its current levels. no new pork included. unless you have read the bill since it just got the green light and seen that the proposed spending is still there.
I don't know although the elder Bush had ex-Nazis working in his campaign. I don't assign any particular meaning to that but since you asked about connections, those particular ones existed.
Were you not in support of government overpaying to stay at trump properties? Is that not pork, or is that how you like your pork?
Neither party has been fiscally responsible in 50 years. The one party that came close was the dems.
You make me miss Allen and Son BBQ.
If the bill is not available, how do you know the pork was cut?
Musk, leading the way away from fossil fuels? By supporting 'drill-baby-drill' Trump and supporting the AfD in Germany?
Musk tries to claim a victory — even though Trump did not get the only thing he wanted (debt ceiling relief).
www.aol.com
The US could cut 100% of pork spending and that’ll amount to a hill of beans in comparison to the deficit.
I assumme the pubs will cut some stuff-on the edges. And cut taxes a bit more. The net-Net will be More debt A good bit more
U.S. Presidents' Net Worth, Before and After Taking Office
Presidents have immense power, but that hasn’t always meant great wealth. You may be shocked at the exceptions to modern office-holders who know how to turn a buck.
The last time there was a balanced budget congress was controlled by pubs. They forced bill to play ball.
That doesn't seem to apply to trump and elon has enough that he good. But getting rich does apply to some presidents.
If you and I are going to converse in good faith then you need to cut the bs lawyer act. I have tried to answer you in good faith. It's kind of hard to cram 1500 pages of spending into 115 pages so I'm relying on common sense and the fact that much of what was objected to wouldn't still be there if it was passed. Hoping you can be objective enough to give credit where credit is due and not be so partisan that all judgement is out the window. I'm not claiming that now but in light of how the events have unfolded and the damning comments made by johnson, I still don't understand how you see this as a bad thing.
