Democrats and their sympathetic media covered up Biden's mental collapse

  • Thread starter Thread starter Callatoroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 146
  • Views: 3K
  • Politics 
Bobfripp said:
You guys are always, always winning. I think we should let you folks take over the country ... I'll watch. The next four years will be so much winning!
Jon Stewart Popcorn GIF
Click to expand...
About to pass a spending bill that had billions in pork cut out and didn't have to shut down the g'ment to do it.

America - 1
Angry Libs - 0

And trump hasn't even officially taken office yet. He is just the de facto potus because joe is m i a.
 
Callatoroy said:
About to pass a spending bill that had billions in pork cut out and didn't have to shut down the g'ment to do it.

America - 1
Angry Libs - 0

And trump hasn't even officially taken office yet. He is just the de facto potus because joe is m i a.
Click to expand...
Fearmongering Pubs - 1
America - 0

Trump couldn't count his balls and get the same number twice.
 
lawtig02 said:
Because it was a bipartisan bill that both Dems and Pubs had worked on to keep the government open and avoid fiscal turmoil. I thought you liked bipartisanship. Or is that just when Dems are calling all the shots?
Click to expand...
In all seriousness, do you think either party has been fiscally responsible? Did you not read johnson's reason for wanting to get the first bill passed? On that issue screw him. And screw bipartisanship when what both sides are doing is screwing the American tax payer.

So your reason for liking the first bill was just that it was bipartisan? Doesn't matter if the content was shit or not? Bipartisanship doesn't equal quality legislation. And all the fear mongering over shutting the g'ment down was just political bs. The fact that a last second 1500 page spending bill got highlighted by DOGE and killed is cause for celebration. That is the kind of change I voted for. Not bad spending policy that happened to be full of pork on both sides so both sides are equally bad but it can be called bipartisan.
 
Callatoroy said:
In all seriousness, do you think either party has been fiscally responsible? Did you not read johnson's reason for wanting to get the first bill passed? On that issue screw him. And screw bipartisanship when what both sides are doing is screwing the American tax payer.

So your reason for liking the first bill was just that it was bipartisan? Doesn't matter if the content was shit or not? Bipartisanship doesn't equal quality legislation. And all the fear mongering over shutting the g'ment down was just political bs. The fact that a last second 1500 page spending bill got highlighted by DOGE and killed is cause for celebration. That is the kind of change I voted for. Not bad spending policy that happened to be full of pork on both sides so both sides are equally bad but it can be called bipartisan.
Click to expand...
Look, the bottom line is that economically the Democratic Party has been better that the Republicans since 1950 by virtually every metric and embarrassingly so. When you talk about that, you don't have a leg to stand on. There's no point in taking you seriously when your main claim is absolutely delusional.
 
Callatoroy said:
In all seriousness, do you think either party has been fiscally responsible? Did you not read johnson's reason for wanting to get the first bill passed? On that issue screw him. And screw bipartisanship when what both sides are doing is screwing the American tax payer.

So your reason for liking the first bill was just that it was bipartisan? Doesn't matter if the content was shit or not? Bipartisanship doesn't equal quality legislation. And all the fear mongering over shutting the g'ment down was just political bs. The fact that a last second 1500 page spending bill got highlighted by DOGE and killed is cause for celebration. That is the kind of change I voted for. Not bad spending policy that happened to be full of pork on both sides so both sides are equally bad but it can be called bipartisan.
Click to expand...
The Dems spend money on things Americans need They try hard to cover it with "taxes on the rich". The Republicans "stall spending a tad" and cut the hell out of Revenue with Tax cuts for the rich. That is the story-Period.
 
mpaer said:
The Dems spend money on things Americans need They try hard to cover it with "taxes on the rich". The Republicans "stall spending a tad" and cut the hell out of Revenue with Tax cuts for the rich. That is the story-Period.
Click to expand...
Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.
 
Callatoroy said:
Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.
Click to expand...
It's mostly the 1% who have benefited from Trump's tax cuts.

donnellonlaw.com

Who Did Trump’s Tax Cut Help the Most? New Data Tell Us.

We are just seeing new data from 2018 federal taxes, which reveal the level of incomes that gained the most. If you made less than $200,000, it was not you.
donnellonlaw.com donnellonlaw.com

"Two particular tax brackets gained the most from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. The slivers of the population whose adjusted gross income was between $200,000 and $1,000,000 gained the most from their 2018 federal taxes."

And the deficit has expanded tremendously because of those tax cuts. That's not what I would call fiscal responsibility.
 
Callatoroy said:
Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.
Click to expand...
I won't argue with you on loan forgiveness . Medicaid ,Soc Sec. Child tax credits. Billionaires paying Zero taxes on their wealth increases-all that blows away a few billion on Student Loans

BTW I have no clue why my font here is what it is
 
mpaer said:
I won't argue with you on loan forgiveness . Medicaid ,Soc Sec. Child tax credits. Billionaires paying Zero taxes on their wealth increases-all that blows away a few billion on Student Loans

BTW I have no clue why my font here is what it is
Click to expand...
Highlight text and hit that big capital I at top
 
chrissteel said:
Maybe honest reporting would have help that happen which was the valid point of this thread
Click to expand...
If it took the WSJ four years into the Biden administration's tenure to report on this, why do you think 'liberal' MSM would know what was going on? I would think there would have to have been a leak from inside the Biden staff for journalists to be aware of what was going on. Was there? The implication of the OP is that the MSM knew, but were covering it up. I don't see any evidence of that.
 
chrissteel said:
Highlight and hit that big capital I at top
Click to expand...

Bobfripp said:
If it took the WSJ four years into the Biden administration's tenure to report on this, why do you think 'liberal' MSM would know what was going on? I would think there would have to have been a leak from inside the Biden staff for journalists to be aware of what was going on. Was there? The implication of the OP is that the MSM knew, but were covering it up. I don't see any evidence of that.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top