theel4life
Honored Member
- Messages
- 801
Yet our country was still better off than under Trump.Leave Trump out of it. Is it just and fair that America had a president in as bad as shape as Biden and how little was reported on it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet our country was still better off than under Trump.Leave Trump out of it. Is it just and fair that America had a president in as bad as shape as Biden and how little was reported on it?
the afghan withdraw catastrophe wouldn't indicate thatYet our country was still better off than under Trump.
Items 2-4: have nothing to do with the Biden administration, and the Biden administration now has inflation under control, USA is economy is outperforming much of the rest of the world.the afghan withdraw catastrophe wouldn't indicate that
russia invading ukraine wouldn't indicate that
hamas attacking israel wouldn't indicate that
inflation wouldn't indicate that
rule of law wouldn't indicate that
most importantly, a majority of Americans didn't believe that
You are such a bad faith actorJust linking to highlight the hypocrisy. Not looking to get into a pissing match where trump is invoked as the default defense of these actions. It was covered up. When pointed out most on here defended those actions based on the left's media reporting and denials from dem leadership (especially KJP's deepfakes). Wondering if on the inside anybody feels like a fool for being repeatedly lied to but not expecting any admissions
White House aides hid Biden’s apparent mental decline from Day 1 of his presidency, explosive report reveals
White House aides shielded the aging commander-in-chief from the public and even rearranged his schedule after scatterbrained performances, an explosive report revealed Thursday.nypost.com
Biden’s apparent mental decline hidden by White House from the start? Bombshell report reveals cover-up tactics
A bombshell report has revealed that White House aides hid President Joe Biden's apparent mental decline from day 1 of the presidency. Aides kept meetings short and controlled access, top advisers acted as go-betweens and public interactions became more scripted. Private discussions with the...economictimes.indiatimes.com
Biden was losing mental abilities even before 2020 election, report says
The June presidential debate between President Biden and then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump may have been the first time that some voters noticed just how diminished Mr. Biden’s capabilities were, but the problems were present more than four years earlier, according to a report.www.washingtontimes.com
try to have a discussion and see if you can go two sentences without mentioning trump. its like trying to discuss anything with a brainwashed member if isis.You are such a bad faith actor
You don't get to post and set the parameters of the response... And you sure as hell don't want good discussion when your post rips most of the posters here
You're not good at this are you?try to have a discussion and see if you can go two sentences without mentioning trump. its like trying to discuss anything with a brainwashed member if isis.
The post you responded to had two sentences, and neither sentence mentioned Trump. So there!try to have a discussion and see if you can go two sentences without mentioning trump. its like trying to discuss anything with a brainwashed member if isis.
winning!!!The post you responded to had two sentences, and neither sentence mentioned Trump. So there!
About to pass a spending bill that had billions in pork cut out and didn't have to shut down the g'ment to do it.
Fearmongering Pubs - 1About to pass a spending bill that had billions in pork cut out and didn't have to shut down the g'ment to do it.
America - 1
Angry Libs - 0
And trump hasn't even officially taken office yet. He is just the de facto potus because joe is m i a.
In all seriousness, do you think either party has been fiscally responsible? Did you not read johnson's reason for wanting to get the first bill passed? On that issue screw him. And screw bipartisanship when what both sides are doing is screwing the American tax payer.Because it was a bipartisan bill that both Dems and Pubs had worked on to keep the government open and avoid fiscal turmoil. I thought you liked bipartisanship. Or is that just when Dems are calling all the shots?
not sure how fearmongering applies but hopefully you can tell me.Fearmongering Pubs - 1
America - 0
Trump couldn't count his balls and get the same number twice.
Look, the bottom line is that economically the Democratic Party has been better that the Republicans since 1950 by virtually every metric and embarrassingly so. When you talk about that, you don't have a leg to stand on. There's no point in taking you seriously when your main claim is absolutely delusional.In all seriousness, do you think either party has been fiscally responsible? Did you not read johnson's reason for wanting to get the first bill passed? On that issue screw him. And screw bipartisanship when what both sides are doing is screwing the American tax payer.
So your reason for liking the first bill was just that it was bipartisan? Doesn't matter if the content was shit or not? Bipartisanship doesn't equal quality legislation. And all the fear mongering over shutting the g'ment down was just political bs. The fact that a last second 1500 page spending bill got highlighted by DOGE and killed is cause for celebration. That is the kind of change I voted for. Not bad spending policy that happened to be full of pork on both sides so both sides are equally bad but it can be called bipartisan.
Isn't everything in MAGA-land based on fear? Immigrants, trans people, gay people, non-Christians, not having one's favorite assault rifle close at hand, etc..not sure how fearmongering applies but hopefully you can tell me.
The Dems spend money on things Americans need They try hard to cover it with "taxes on the rich". The Republicans "stall spending a tad" and cut the hell out of Revenue with Tax cuts for the rich. That is the story-Period.In all seriousness, do you think either party has been fiscally responsible? Did you not read johnson's reason for wanting to get the first bill passed? On that issue screw him. And screw bipartisanship when what both sides are doing is screwing the American tax payer.
So your reason for liking the first bill was just that it was bipartisan? Doesn't matter if the content was shit or not? Bipartisanship doesn't equal quality legislation. And all the fear mongering over shutting the g'ment down was just political bs. The fact that a last second 1500 page spending bill got highlighted by DOGE and killed is cause for celebration. That is the kind of change I voted for. Not bad spending policy that happened to be full of pork on both sides so both sides are equally bad but it can be called bipartisan.
Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.The Dems spend money on things Americans need They try hard to cover it with "taxes on the rich". The Republicans "stall spending a tad" and cut the hell out of Revenue with Tax cuts for the rich. That is the story-Period.
It's mostly the 1% who have benefited from Trump's tax cuts.Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.