Democrats and their sympathetic media covered up Biden's mental collapse

  • Thread starter Thread starter Callatoroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 130
  • Views: 2K
  • Politics 
Callatoroy said:
Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.
Click to expand...
I won't argue with you on loan forgiveness . Medicaid ,Soc Sec. Child tax credits. Billionaires paying Zero taxes on their wealth increases-all that blows away a few billion on Student Loans

BTW I have no clue why my font here is what it is
 
mpaer said:
I won't argue with you on loan forgiveness . Medicaid ,Soc Sec. Child tax credits. Billionaires paying Zero taxes on their wealth increases-all that blows away a few billion on Student Loans

BTW I have no clue why my font here is what it is
Click to expand...
Highlight text and hit that big capital I at top
 
chrissteel said:
Maybe honest reporting would have help that happen which was the valid point of this thread
Click to expand...
If it took the WSJ four years into the Biden administration's tenure to report on this, why do you think 'liberal' MSM would know what was going on? I would think there would have to have been a leak from inside the Biden staff for journalists to be aware of what was going on. Was there? The implication of the OP is that the MSM knew, but were covering it up. I don't see any evidence of that.
 
chrissteel said:
Highlight and hit that big capital I at top
Click to expand...

Bobfripp said:
If it took the WSJ four years into the Biden administration's tenure to report on this, why do you think 'liberal' MSM would know what was going on? I would think there would have to have been a leak from inside the Biden staff for journalists to be aware of what was going on. Was there? The implication of the OP is that the MSM knew, but were covering it up. I don't see any evidence of that.
Click to expand...
 
chrissteel said:

Special prosecutor Hur cited Biden’s 2017 conversations with ghostwriter Mark Zwonitzer, which Hur described as “painfully slow, with Mr. Biden struggling to remember events and straining at times to read and relay his own notebook entries.”
Click to expand...
Just curious. What's your point here?
 
I’m
Callatoroy said:
Sorry, but that's just a little to cliche, overly simplistic, and partisan. What Americans need is purely subjective (other than roads, defense, other infrastructure) I don't think Americans need student loan forgiveness. You may feel they do. Neither is right or wrong. I'm far from rich but I have benefited greatly from the trump tax cuts. As have most of my middle to upper middle class friends.
Click to expand...
“Other than roads, defense, other infrastructure”

So, what isn’t essential?
  • FDA?
  • FAA?
  • FBI?
  • DEA?
  • NOAA?
  • NWS?
  • NPS?
  • ATF?
  • DEA?
  • TSA?
  • NIH?
  • EPA?
  • Clean Water Act?
  • Clean Air Act?
 
chrissteel said:


For your review issue with him are a myth
Spoke for 40 min at the 92 convention
Click to expand...

Kinda like Biden knocked it outta the park at his ‘24 State-of-the-Union speech.

Reagan shouldn’t have been POTUS at least the last 2-3 years of his 2nd term; Biden should have never run for re-election and likely should have stepped aside 1-2 years ago; Trump is in no way physically or mentally capable of being POTUS.
 
Zoo_View said:
Kinda like Biden knocked it outta the park at his ‘24 State-of-the-Union speech.

Reagan shouldn’t have been POTUS at least the last 2-3 years of his 2nd term; Biden should have never run for re-election and likely should have stepped aside 1-2 years ago; Trump is in no way physically or mentally capable of being POTUS.
Click to expand...
Except Reagan (like Trump) was not running for reelection, did not have mental decline for years later unlike Biden had in his first year in office. They covered up Biden problems going back to 2017 and he had the good luck of running for office from his basement during covid where his handlers could keep his remarks well edited and a compliant media. It is really a scandal that has nothing to do with age.
 
lawtig02 said:
After the last four years, I think most Dems would probably support an age limit on POTUS. Maybe 75? I'd be fine with 70 personally. Would you?
Click to expand...
Maybe 75 would be acceptable.

It would be more stamina than intellect, though, as far as my concerns. I'm about to turn 73 and don't consider myself mentally diminished to any real extent but would have some concerns of fatigue under high stress. But a lot of that is temperament. I don't really think there should be an age limit. I just think there should be more careful attention paid to who is actually running.

I would prefer to be able to recognize and utilize the exceptional than pretend that an arbitrary age/anything is an automatic disqualification.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top