Election legal battles & fraud claims

[nycfan]

Extraordinary motion denied but I don't think this shuts down the available appeals completely

 

[nycfan]

 

[nycfan]

 

[gregh1]

Judge who tossed Trump's classified docs case on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

A document circulated within Donald Trump's transition operation lists Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed his classified docs case, as a possible AG candidate, sources say.

abcnews.go.com

 

[superrific]

Judge who tossed Trump's classified docs case on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

A document circulated within Donald Trump's transition operation lists Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed his classified docs case, as a possible AG candidate, sources say.

abcnews.go.com

1. Of course.
2. If she takes the job, she'd be a complete idiot.

 

[mpaer]

1. Of course.
2. If she takes the job, she'd be a complete idiot.

You mean an 18 month job versus a life job...............Maybe 8 months

 

[SnoopRob]

1. Of course.
2. If she takes the job, she'd be a complete idiot.

She's already a complete idiot, she'd just be a higher ranking one.

 

[nycfan]

 

[nycfan]

 

[nycfan]

 

[nycfan]

 

[nycfan]

 

[ZenMode]

They finally found Trump's "fraud".

Georgia’s Republican secretary of state finds just 20 noncitizens registered to vote out of 8.2 million

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/23/politics/georgia-raffensperger-noncitizens-registered/index.html

 

[nycfan]

 

[farce©]

What is “proof of citizenship?”

 

[superrific]

He should be impeached (he won't be) and charged criminally for these actions. At a minimum, he could be convicted of contempt of court but there are other laws he violated as well. Alas, it won't happen. Hopefully the federal court does the right thing. It's the 6th Circuit, though.

 

[aGDevil2k]

So what happens to burned Arizona ballots?

 

[superrific]

What is “proof of citizenship?”

It's a blatantly illegal requirement and here's hoping the courts strike it down immediately. It's illegal on many different axes, actually. It's racially discriminatory in application, but even more obviously it discriminates on the basis of national origin, which has long been established as illegal on its face.

 

[farce©]

It's a blatantly illegal requirement and here's hoping the courts strike it down immediately. It's illegal on many different axes, actually. It's racially discriminatory in application, but even more obviously it discriminates on the basis of national origin, which has long been established as illegal on its face.

I mean what document is proof of citizenship? Does LaRose expect everybody to bring their birth certificate, passport, or naturalization papers to the polls with them? And of those, only a passport is a “photo ID.”

 

[superrific]

I mean what document is proof of citizenship? Does LaRose expect everybody to bring their birth certificate, passport, or naturalization papers to the polls with them? And of those, only a passport is a “photo ID.”

Yes, they are expecting naturalization papers. I just went back and read the opinion from 2006 that originally enjoined the practice. They want naturalized citizens to produce naturalization papers. The court called the law "shameful."