as a sex offender, maxwell is ineligible to be housed in a low security camp per BOP policy.
Well, how about unprecedented and highly indicative of special treatment from the highest level of the DOJ in exchange for something?
Dems don't actually care that much if he's "implicated." I mean, what's going to happen? He'll be impeached? Please. And you're of course moving the goal posts as you always do. I mean, they already purported to release everything, or did you forget about that? Why would they release a doctored video if they weren't trying to gaslight.
Since it is apparently unclear, this is the part I'm questioning:
Now explain why Trump did everything he could NOT to release the files.Trump's name being in the files isn't surprising because he and Epstein were good friends.
His name being in the files doesn't mean he's implicated in any wrongdoing. That doesn't change because Dems really, really , really want him to be implicated.
"but he doesn’t want to release them because a lot of people in those files can be “hurt” by them."
Correct. The victims and people, like you, who assume that being mentioned is the same thing as being an active participant in the sex crimes.
"How dumb do you have to be to not be able to connect the dots here?"
You connect those dots, buddy.
YOU are the one making claims about the situation. YOU need to support your claims.
I just did. Obviously, what I have to go on is pieces of information that has been made public, rather than the actual Epstein files, but apparently, that will never be made available to us in any unabridged form, will it?
maxwell is a serial perjurer. what evidence is there that her testimony isn't false? especially testimony in service of lessening her sentence?
She was indicted on two counts of perjury, I believe.
What evidence is there that a pink unicorn didn't create the universe?
If you're going to claim that she was moved to a minimum security prison because she agreed or intended to make false statements, it's on YOU to support that claim. It's not my job to disprove what you never proved to begin with.
Trump's name being in the files isn't surprising because he and Epstein were good friends.
His name being in the files doesn't mean he's implicated in any wrongdoing. That doesn't change because Dems really, really , really want him to be implicated.
"but he doesn’t want to release them because a lot of people in those files can be “hurt” by them."
Correct. The victims and people who assumed, by people like you, that being mentioned is the same thing as being an active participant in the sex crimes.
"How dumb do you have to be to not be able to connect the dots here?"
You connect those dots, buddy.
He’s in Zen mode, so the appearance of collusion must just be an operation of samsara.
My first thought was that it's what she negotiated as part of agreeing to testify.
It better be. If it’s true, why would she dare leave unless she has armed guards?
Surely this report is incorrect?
I doubt that people can come and go from even the least restrictive federal prison.
Surely this report is incorrect?
That is what I would think — but it is usually the case that visitors can come and go without much if any security interaction at some of these minimum security locations, maybe that caused a misunderstanding here …
