- Messages
- 2,048
I've read enough about Carroll and viewed her interviews to render a judgment on her credibility especially since her whole allegation and complaint was hatched by George Conway at a Manhattan soiree.Just trying to understand your thinking here. Giuffre said Donald Trump did not sexually assault her and you accept that as the inviolable truth. Carroll said Trump DID sexually assault her and you reject that as a lie. And the other 23 women listed in Tangled's post say Trump sexually assaulted them as well, but you have no "information or knowledge," and therefore "have no reason to comment one way or another."
Seriously, does it ever cross your mind that you draw every conclusion in a way that favors Donald Trump, no matter how inconsistent or illogical that is?
Similarly, I've read enough about Virginia G. and viewed her interviews to make a determination that she is credible. This is confirmed by the fact that she reached a sizable settlement with Prince Andrew so her testimony was vetted by powerful counsels of the Royal Family.
I honestly am not familiar with the other 23 women's accounts but a lot of them strike me as true given Trump's past of groping women.
