Epstein "stole people" who worked for Trump

[Oddball]

To respond to the OP's query directly:

Andrew Jackson would probably have said and done the same if someone stole one of his slaves....

But, of course, the Andrew Jackson comparison is apt in so many ways. Many of which are intentional by trump and his cabal, which is the scariest part and why the the cult will not be put off by these words one little bit

 

[CHAMTRAIN]

Until today, the MAGA line was that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago in 2004 because he learned Epstein was a pervert. Now the story is being changed.

Trump ended his relationship with Epstein over a real estate deal. Many believe that Trump played a role in Epstein's criminal issues in Florida in the early 2000's.

 

[UNCatTech]

I'm just not seeing why you think this is such a big deal. Trump is speaking with his usual bluntness.

Did you really expect Trump to say: "Mr. Epstein's actions constituted a tortious interference with my employer/employee contractual relationships by his wrongful inducement, solicitation and hiring of my Mar a Lago employees." "Accordingly, I ceased my personal and professional relationship with Mr. Epstein."

I think people are drawn to Trump precisely BECAUSE he doesn't sound like a politician/lawyer who carefully crafts and focus group tests his language.

At the time Trump ceased his relationship with Epstein he had not been charged or convicted of any sex trafficking charges. I will note that MANY famous and wealthy people continued to publicly associate with Epstein after he pled guilty to soliciting and procuring minors for prostitution in 2008 and was a registered sex offender:

Noam Chomsky
Woody Allen
Lawrence Summers
Bill Gates
Leon Black
Leon Botstein
Mortimer Zuckerman
Ariane de Rothschild
Prince Andrew
Reid Hoffman
Peter Thiel
Thomas Pritzker
William Burns
Kathryn Ruemmler.....among others

April 30, 2023. May 3, 2023, May 17, 2023 and December 19, 2023 Wall Street Journal.

And I would not vote for any of them for president. Well, maybe Gates, as he seems to have changed as he's grown older and is spending his money to try and make the world healthier.

But, many voted for trump knowing that he associated with Epstein and then believe that a comparison of others that are also guilty somehow exonerates Drump from the association? Why would that be?

Also, surprised you didn't mention Bill.

 

[UNCatTech]

It's not a big deal to his followers that his story keeps changing. They will accept any explanation fed to them.

Well trump told us that he could shoot someone and they would still vote for him. He was right about that...

 

[JCTarheel82]

Well trump told us that he could shoot someone and they would still vote for him. He was right about that...

Turns out he could shoot them and they would still vote for him (if they survived).

 

[gtyellowjacket]

And I would not vote for any of them for president. Well, maybe Gates, as he seems to have changed as he's grown older and is spending him money to try and make the world healthier.

But, many voted for trump knowing that he associated with Epstein and then believe that a comparison of others that are also guilty somehow exonerates Drump from the association? Why would that be?

Also, surprised you didn't mention Bill.

Poor Bill Gates. No respect for his contributions except for the last few years. He has been spending at least a billion per year on charity for at least 25 years.

Dude has given so much and really does it without putting his name on buildings or other vanity projects. And he is very thoughtful about how he spends his money.

 

[Geisterfahrer]

I'm just not seeing why you think this is such a big deal. Trump is speaking with his usual bluntness.

Did you really expect Trump to say: "Mr. Epstein's actions constituted a tortious interference with my employer/employee contractual relationships by his wrongful inducement, solicitation and hiring of my Mar a Lago employees." "Accordingly, I ceased my personal and professional relationship with Mr. Epstein."

I think people are drawn to Trump precisely BECAUSE he doesn't sound like a politician/lawyer who carefully crafts and focus group tests his language.

At the time Trump ceased his relationship with Epstein he had not been charged or convicted of any sex trafficking charges. I will note that MANY famous and wealthy people continued to publicly associate with Epstein after he pled guilty to soliciting and procuring minors for prostitution in 2008 and was a registered sex offender:

Noam Chomsky
Woody Allen
Lawrence Summers
Bill Gates
Leon Black
Leon Botstein
Mortimer Zuckerman
Ariane de Rothschild
Prince Andrew
Reid Hoffman
Peter Thiel
Thomas Pritzker
William Burns
Kathryn Ruemmler.....among others

April 30, 2023. May 3, 2023, May 17, 2023 and December 19, 2023 Wall Street Journal.

It’s like you just copypasta whatever dumbass facebook groups you’re on.

My hunch is Epstein fed a wide variety sexual appetites, and they weren’t necessarily underage girls. It was whatever whoever wanted, and then he could get over on them. Including all those named above, possibly, and for fucking sure DJT, who is a lifelong poon hound and sexual predator.

 

[Healing]

Turns out he could shoot them and they would still vote for him (if they survived).

They’d brag at the bar about being one of the ones Chancellor Trump shot. It’s like he’s Immortan Joe and they’re all just warboys.

 

[UNCatTech]

Poor Bill Gates. No respect for his contributions except for the last few years. He has been spending at least a billion per year on charity for at least 25 years.

Dude has given so much and really does it without putting his name on buildings or other vanity projects. And he is very thoughtful about how he spends his money.

I didn't mean for it to sound as if he only recently began his charities. Poor wording on my part. I know he's done a lot. Some of the documentaries about him are amazing. Compared to trumps documentaries which are disgusting.

But, if it were to come out that he was in the Epstein files for the same reasons that we assume trump is there for, I would struggle to vote for him, even considering his charitable endeavors.

I don't believe that trumps charitable endeavors are anywhere near that of Gates and I believe that trump is more of a sleaze ball, so I could never vote for him either.