đź‘€ Waltz, SecDef SignalGate | Signalgate 2.0 Oct 2025

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 575
  • Views: 30K
  • Politics 
superrific said:
Maybe it's a bad idea for the country to sell out all its principles, erode our liberties and civil rights, and elect nincompoops based on imagined threats that have no basis in reality. Why y'all so scared of everything? Living in fear, my god.
Click to expand...
It's because Fox News. Fox News has managed to brainwash and cultivate a population of fact-ignorant sissies. Like Pandemic Blue, for example.
 
CFordUNC said:
Ooof. This ain’t a good look, brother. Even by your standards of reflexively defending literally anything and everything Donald Trump, to say that there was no breach of security is astonishingly dumb. I mean, they literally were texting about actual attack plans involving active duty United States military personnel who were dropping munitions on enemy targets in enemy territory. Are you really going to try to act like this is a giant nothing burger with a straight face? Come on, now. You can still love Donald Trump and also accept that this is a colossal national security failure that needs to be rectified with resignations or firings.
Click to expand...
No doubt Pete shouldn't have been identifying the timing for the attacks but at least no information of individual sources, specific weaponry to be used and units involved in the attack. I've already said they should admit they erred and move on.

As for firing, name me one Biden official or military official that was fired for the Afghanistan debacle or any other screw up?
 
Ramrouser said:
No doubt Pete shouldn't have been identifying the timing for the attacks but at least no information of individual sources, specific weaponry to be used and units involved in the attack. I've already said they should admit they erred and move on.

As for firing, name me one Biden official or military official that was fired for the Afghanistan debacle or any other screw up?
Click to expand...
It’s even worse than that! The architect of the Afghanistan debacle was just REHIRED by the American people for another four years term!
 
Ramrouser said:
No doubt Pete shouldn't have been identifying the timing for the attacks but at least no information of individual sources, specific weaponry to be used and units involved in the attack. I've already said they should admit they erred and move on.

As for firing, name me one Biden official or military official that was fired for the Afghanistan debacle or any other screw up?
Click to expand...
This isn’t an “admit they erred and move on” situation. They were discussing actual military movement and attack plans on an unauthorized, unsecured channel, and included someone who does not have security clearances. This is a “multiple someones need to resign or be fired” situation, and you know good and well that would be your stance had this occurred under the Biden administration. You know it, I know it.
 
CFordUNC said:
This isn’t an “admit they erred and move on” situation. They were discussing actual military movement and attack plans on an unauthorized, unsecured channel, and included someone who does not have security clearances. This is a “multiple someones need to resign or be fired” situation, and you know good and well that would be your stance had this occurred under the Biden administration. You know it, I know it.
Click to expand...
So this was worse than Afghanistan with people dying and literally falling out of the sky from airplanes? That debacle indirectly lead to Russia attacking Ukraine. Where was the demand for mass firings after that foreign policy debacle - and don't try and blame it on Trump as Biden was responsible for the logistics and the Sept 11th timing.
 
The Admin. is digging in protecting Hegeseth comments. They probably got the idea and talking points from Sean Hannity/Faux News. If Elon is the real Prez. then Hannity is the VP.

Anyway, they are claiming that Hegseth did not lie or mislead in ANY way. They contend it is because he said there were no "War Plans" on the chat, and never said there were not "Attack Plans."

Not sure what the excuse will be for Tulsi who waa asked specifically if any general target was displayed, any particular times, or any particular weapons used. She said no. My guess here is that she included the phrase "that I recall." But this wasn't years ago.

And they all claimed there was no classified information on the chat. 100% false and no way to deny. The point about Biden's Admin allowing Signal to be installed, does not allow for classified info, conversations, and military ops planning. Only MAGAt dunderheads like RamRammer would fall for that.

Oh, and they are still bashing the Atlantic Editor as if their opinions of him matter. He was the only responsible one on the chat. He only released the Plans days after the strike, and only because he was forced to with all the perjury and lies yesterday.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top