Going after Greenland

  • Thread starter Thread starter dukeman92
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 474
  • Views: 17K
  • Politics 
All of the rationalizations we're hearing from MAGAs are simply horrible. It's basically "we're the bully on the block, the biggest and baddest in the world, and we should just take what we want and other nations be damned. If those 60,000 people living in Greenland don't want us there then tough shit, we want it and so it should be ours!" It really does sound like something a pirate or Nazi would say.
Nazis we’re much more subtle than this.
 


Unless there is some unseen or unseeable geopolitical motive, the threatened invasion/occupation of Greenland is the single dumbest foreign policy ever articulated. It is the epitome of a self-inflicted wound. The immediate victim is NATO. The only person cheering it on now is Vladimir Putin.

I don't disagree with what is said here. However, I think there is a real possibility that--out of a sense of modesty--Vlad "the Ras" Putin is not cheering on a US policy that he directed St. Donald of Mar-a-Lago to pursue "or else."
 

GOP senator’s scathing message to Stephen Miller: Get informed on Greenland or leave the job​

It's amazing how they are willing to speak up once they decide to retire. This is probably Tillis' shining moment as an elected official. It's low praise, but at least he's banging the drum. He's taking the heat from the Trump people so his peers don't have to. Which is not great, but at least it prevents them (hopefully) from groveling on camera.
 
It's amazing how they are willing to speak up once they decide to retire. This is probably Tillis' shining moment as an elected official. It's low praise, but at least he's banging the drum. He's taking the heat from the Trump people so his peers don't have to. Which is not great, but at least it prevents them (hopefully) from groveling on camera.
It's not a profile in courage; it's a profile in cowardice
 
It's not a profile in courage; it's a profile in cowardice
Oh, don't get me wrong. I agree. I'm simultaneously saying that a) I'm glad Tillis is saying this; b) where the fuck was this for the past decade and a half; and c) why does he have to cover for his colleagues in asserting that we should not blow up our defense alliance for Trump's vanity.
 
You'd have to pay me a lot more than 100K to join the US from Greenland.

Hopefully they understand -- and probably they do -- that the reason the US wants to own Greenland is the prospect of cheaply mining rare earths. That is, they aren't going to bother with pesky concerns about the environment. Radium in the drinking water? Eh, it's just Greenlanders. Who cares?

Problem is that Greenlanders might not realize the full extent of MAGA depravity. I mean, it's hard for Americans to do it. I continue to find myself surprised by some of Trump's shit, even though I know there's no bottom, that he's capable of anything, that he actively looks to find evil to do. And yet we are conditioned to assume that people aren't complete psychopaths.

All I can say to Greenland is, "do not take the bait. You will get fucked over, hard."
 
Why don't they put that money here where it's within our national borders. That's even better for national security.


  • Wyoming (Halleck Creek): Home to one of North America's largest deposits, with billions of tons estimated, though development focuses on economic viability.
  • Montana (Sheep Creek): Contains the highest-grade rare earth deposit found in the U.S. (nearly 9% Total Rare Earth Oxides), crucial for high-tech applications.
  • California (Mountain Pass): A major operational mine, producing significant quantities of rare earths, particularly neodymium, for magnets.
  • Utah: Recent discoveries suggest large critical mineral caches, potentially including rare earths.
 
Back
Top