Harris/Walz Catch-All | Kamala blitz in closing stretch

  • Thread starter Thread starter aGDevil2k
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 1K
  • Views: 30K
  • Politics 
lawtig02 said:
Hey HeelYeah and other Trump voters here, these are the types of things you might want to be paying attention to, because it’s not a hollow threat.


A Hungarian opposition radio station lost an appeal against the removal of its licence on Tuesday, cutting by one the already dwindling ranks of media outlets critical of the country's nationalist government.

The media authority said in September it would not renew Klubradio's licence due to what it called a string of regulatory offences by the station during a seven-year licence term that expires on Sunday
Click to expand...
you want him to vote for Trump even harder?
 
superrific said:
I can't imagine voting for Trump while hard.
Click to expand...
Veronica Corningstone:
Mr. Burgundy, you have a *massive* erection.

Ron Burgundy:
Really?
[looks down]

Ron Burgundy:
Yes, I do. Um... I'm sorry, it's... It's the pleats. It's actually an optical illusion, it's the pattern on the pant's that it's not flattering in the crotchal region. I'm actually taking them back right now, taking them back to the... The pants store. Well, this is awkward. I'm gonna walk this situation off and I will see you later.
[walking away]

Ron Burgundy:
Nothing to look at. Get back to work everyone. Don't act like you're not impressed.
 
Disagree here. She somewhat fell out of the news cycle and is trying to re-energize the cycle. She’s not Barack Obama for sure. But she has done reasonably well and, frankly, one thing Trump has done well is be “available” and “in the media”.

Visibility (particularly as she has done - non Trump focused) is generally positive in my mind. It brings some risk…but I think she’s just a better candidate than 2020. And it shows.

I do want a much more pointed economy answer. I think it’s need to be a stump response - as concise as you can make it, while touching inflation is down, markets are up, jobs and growth are strong, and her middle class agenda is focused on targeting those whose wallets and lives have been most affected by inflation. With a nod to Donald Trump being handed a strong economy, and his failure to manage and lead (rather than ramble and disappear) during Covid being a big part of the economy’s aftershocks.

She has components of this response but needs it rounded out, confident and repeatable 1000x in her sleep.
 
nycfan said:


Take away the CBS License!
She is a moron!

——
Note that CBS featured the longer answer on their Sunday morning show and then edited for the Monday night special. So they did not hide it — they used it as their hook for the program as part of the Sunday morning political press (which usually drives press coverage for days).
Click to expand...

To clarify, the "edited" version wasn't broadcast in a replay of the interview, it was used in a promo for the interview.

If true, it still seems sketchy and pro-Harris/anti-Trump.
 
ZenMode said:
To clarify, the "edited" version wasn't broadcast in a replay of the interview, it was used in a promo for the interview.

If true, it still seems sketchy and pro-Harris/anti-Trump.
Click to expand...
Sketchy because they edited an interview? GTFO. Especially considering the absolute deluge of lies and spewed nonsense by Trump that gets cleaned up in the media. If they were hiding it why even put it in the promo?
 
Enigma94 said:
Sketchy because they edited an interview? GTFO. Especially considering the absolute deluge of lies and spewed nonsense by Trump that gets cleaned up in the media. If they were hiding it why even put it in the promo?
Click to expand...
Sketchy because they use no part of her actual word salad response. They could have used any question from any part of the interview in their promo. They picked a good question to intrigue viewers, but cherry picked a line from a completely different part of the interview.
 
ZenMode said:
Sketchy because they use no part of her actual word salad response. They could have used any question from any part of the interview in their promo. They picked a good question to intrigue viewers, but cherry picked a line from a completely different part of the interview.
Click to expand...
Apparently I had it backwards. If all they did was edit for a promo but then included the entire response in the actual airing of the interview then you are even more full of shit.
 
ZenMode said:
Sketchy because they use no part of her actual word salad response. They could have used any question from any part of the interview in their promo. They picked a good question to intrigue viewers, but cherry picked a line from a completely different part of the interview.
Click to expand...
Go drive a damn Tesla
 
Enigma94 said:
Apparently I had it backwards. If all they did was edit for a promo but then included the entire response in the actual airing of the interview then you are even more full of shit.
Click to expand...
I believe that the word salad version was in the promo and the more concise version was in the aired interview.

It looks like they put a longer version in the promo that made her look bad - with the goal of enticing Pubs to watch? - and then edited and showed a much more concise version in the televised interview.

It's a really, really stupid thing for CBS to do.

But if CBS were really trying to be in the tank for Kamala, they'd have used the edited version in both places. Instead, they've created a controversy where otherwise there was merely an inartful answer.
 
SnoopRob said:
I believe that the word salad version was in the promo and the more concise version was in the aired interview.

It looks like they put a longer version in the promo that made her look bad - with the goal of enticing Pubs to watch? - and then edited and showed a much more concise version in the televised interview.

It's a really, really stupid thing for CBS to do.

But if CBS were really trying to be in the tank for Kamala, they'd have used the edited version in both places. Instead, they've created a controversy where otherwise there was merely an inartful answer.
Click to expand...
Holy crap. I was giving them the benefit of the doubt.

Why sugar-coat what they did as showing a "much more concise version"?
 
Last edited:
unc879 said:
As a reminder, there is only one network who had to pay a judgement of over 800 million for basically lying to their viewers and defaming a company. Any guesses? Hint: It is not CBS.
Click to expand...
I don't watch Fox News, but people who are informed know that Fox News TV channel, at least what I've seen after work during prime time, is nothing close to a 'news' station and should not be expected to provide unbiased, factual information. We expect CBS to be objective and accurate and not behave like Fox News.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top