Hot Stove: UNC Basketball

  • Thread starter Thread starter UNCMSinLS
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 73K
  • UNC Sports 
It’s certainly better to overspend than to underspend in this situation.

I guess you can spread the 14 million out or go all in 2-3 high end guys.

You won’t know if it was the right play until it’s all said and done.
 
I thought by generous estimate you were saying I was exaggerating. Now I think you meant the opposite, correct? I was underestimating.

Teams have been using unproven players since the beginning of college basketball. It's part of the game. I get that you think we spent too much, but we got several high potential players. If they work out, this team could be really fucking good. High upside, lower downside.

No, you brought up wanting to be better than average

I meant assigning $1.5M per player as an estimated rate for a roster's top 7 players was generous

I don't think too many average teams will have over $10M invested in their roster (though some certainly will)

$10M could very well be average top 25 however. That's more in line with where I would've guessed UNC was
 
Back
Top