Hubert Davis Catch-all

  • Thread starter Thread starter LeoBloom
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 677
  • Views: 11K
  • UNC Sports 
Maybe someone has asked this question already but at $14 million, how come it ISN'T top-25 talent, even without Caleb?

Edit: I admit I came up with $14 million completely from a possibly faulty memory, so I apologize for my ignorance in advance if I have over- or under-stated this.
 
No. Evans, Boga, Young, High aren't good

Stevenson and Powell are role players

Dixon is a year away at least

Poor Veesaar and Trimble
Luka is good. What a ridiculous statement. He is averaging almost 10 points a game at Division 1 UNC!!!


He just needs more consistency. You need role players to win such as Stevenson and Powell. Luka has to be a starter and they need to get him more shots to get on track and in rhythm. We have to get a third scorer.

If Veesar, Trimble and Luka can increase scoring and Dixon can start making consistently good decisions, and if the team rallies for CW and plays better defense they can make the tournament and win that first game. After that, CW MAY be able to come back and who knows what damage can be done.

Remember that no one expected the Joe Forte led 2000 UNC team to make the final four and they did.
 
I guess I disagree. There's no way this team, without CWilson, is not as talented and/or put together significantly worse than:

BYU, St. John’s, Iowa, Saint Louis, Utah State, State, UK, Nova, Auburn, Indiana, Arkansas, TAMU

(I pulled these from Torvik and KenPom)

BYU has 3 players who have scored 30+ this season. Easily more talented
Arkansas has one of the top back courts in the country and a front court rotation of 3 6'10 seniors. Easily more talented

SJU has good athletes and mostly seniors. Good defensive unit with just enough shooting. More talented
Kentucky is all over the place but is deep in the front court. Oweh/Aberdeen are serviceable. More talented

Iowa is mostly Stirtz who happens to be very good. Won't say more talented. Borderline top 25
St. Louis is deep and balanced. They are playing a bit beyond their talent perhaps. Borderline top 25

Indiana, Nova, Auburn, TAMU aren't top 25 imo. And not watching the MWC so no comment on Utah St and state sucks
 
BYU has 3 players who have scored 30+ this season. Easily more talented
Arkansas has one of the top back courts in the country and a front court rotation of 3 6'10 seniors. Easily more talented

SJU has good athletes and mostly seniors. Good defensive unit with just enough shooting. More talented
Kentucky is all over the place but is deep in the front court. Oweh/Aberdeen are serviceable. More talented

Iowa is mostly Stirtz who happens to be very good. Won't say more talented. Borderline top 25
St. Louis is deep and balanced. They are playing a bit beyond their talent perhaps. Borderline top 25

Indiana, Nova, Auburn, TAMU aren't top 25 imo. And not watching the MWC so no comment on Utah St and state sucks
Thanks for the detailed breakdown. I still think you're underselling the talent on this team.
 
Luka is good. What a ridiculous statement. He just needs more consistency. You need role players to win such as Stevenson and Powell. Luka has to be a starter and they need to get him more shots to get on track and in rhythm. We have to get a third scorer.

If Veesar, Trimble and Luka can increase scoring and Dixon can start making consistently good decisions, and if the team rallies for CW and plays better defense they can make the tournament and win that first game. After that, CW MAY be able to come back and who knows what damage can be done.

Remember that no one expected the Joe Forte led 2000 UNC team to make the final four and they did.

Luka is averaging 8 ppg on 39% shooting in ACC play while being a minus defender. That isn't good

Agreed he has to be a starter and increase production greatly with Caleb out. I'm just skeptical he will
 
He's someone who'd almost surely come here if offered. He ain't winning shit at Vandy, and if he cares about that at all, he won't be there long. Somebody's gonna get him. Kentucky and Kansas very well may be both looking for coaches in the next 2-3 years, too.

From Virginia. Played at UNC-W. Coached under Cremins at Charleston. Byington would be one hell of a Plan D.
Vandy coach is the most intriguing to me...been saying that a while.
 
Maybe someone has asked this question already but at $14 million, how come it ISN'T top-25 talent, even without Caleb?

Edit: I admit I came up with $14 million completely from a possibly faulty memory, so I apologize for my ignorance in advance if I have over- or under-stated this.
Caleb is a big chunk of that 14 million. What do other teams rosters look like without their highest paid/best player?
 
No one knows. But rumors were that AJ was asking $6-$8 million from BYU, and it was thought that was roughly double what the top prospects were demanding, so that would suggest Caleb was somewhere in the $3 million range. But that is just a guestimate.
If so, our roster would still be more without him than Duke paid for their roster (according to Greg, via Nakos).
 
Didn't we land Caleb fairly late? That would suggest that we might have submitted a higher bid. If AJ got 6, maybe Caleb asked for 4.5.
 
Didn't we land Caleb fairly late? That would suggest that we might have submitted a higher bid. If AJ got 6, maybe Caleb asked for 4.5.
We got him in early February, which is reasonably late, but not so late as to be at a huge premium. I'd think 4.5 would be near the very upper range of what we paid, but it is at least theoretically possible.
 
I am dubious that Duke only paid $10 million. Maybe Cam and Cayden were willing to give Duke a hometown discount.
If I remember some of the things Boozer said about Duke after leaving corrective, I suspect that there are thins more tangible than love involved. To quote, "What's love got to do with it".
 
Back
Top