I do not necessarily want to reboot this whole deal, but I also want my position to be mine, and not assigned. Someone said that those who support Hubert are doing so out of some kind of loyalty to him or whatever, and those who are anti or whatever word folks want to use support the program.
As for the original hire, I supported Hubert mostly because Roy did. Who would have better info than Roy? If it has been Wes Miller, that would have been fine too, although right now Wes not looking so hot.
I have wavered at times on the Hubert hire but had not really gone on Facebook or here and vented. Year 2 I dismissed as just chemistry issues, and the fact we caught lightning in the bottle year prior, but he was within 4 points and a healthy Bacot of a natty. Year 3 good, year 4, not so much.
This year I have seen him build the roster, as indicated earlier I think he is growing as a coach, and to the list I would add I don't think we have had UNC teams, certainly not Roy's average 10 TOs a game. I want rehash what I see as other positive trends in coaching.
But here is why I support him: AT THIS POINT, I think he is the best man for the job. Notice how no one every beats down our door when the positive is available. I actually believe he is coaching much better, recruiting well (come on down Dylan), etc. Yea, I like the guy but I also think he is growing as a coach and is not close to his ceiling. So is it is no some blind loyalty to Hubert, or the Carolina Way, etc. This year the team has rallied from 16 down at Virginia and 13 down to dook, with wins over Kentucky at Rupp and Kansas. He also gave us the gift of Caleb Wilson.
So I think he is the right guy.