What a crock, fantasy dreamland stuff.
If or when HD goes, and nobody from Dean’s/Roy’s tree is hired, which seems unlikely now (all the Wes advocates are awfully quiet about that lately btw!), the legacy is over. There will be an embarrassing search for a new coach that will turn up someone well down the wishlist, someone who most fans have barely even heard of. That will be the result of your so-called “thorough search!” He will have middling results and crumble under the pressure of the spoiled entitled fans like you who salivated for a change from HD only a few years earlier, thinking you could have your cake and eat it too.
In this bullshit version of the NCAA where all bonds with players are torn apart each season just as soon as they were even beginning to form, Hubert is currently the only hope of retaining what I love about college hoops and UNC. I wouldn’t trade that for the distant hope of a few more wins and an extra weekend in the tourney every now and again, at best. And at worst, worse results and a very public spiral, and one not tied to the ballast of Dean and Roy to steady it. The only hope would be if after this probable disaster, someone like Marcus Paige were ready for a shot.
But as it stands, you guys seem to have absolutely no idea what you’re wishing for. Head in the clouds kind of expectations and demands. Expecting not only for top candidates to be jumping at the chance (we already got an indication last time around that the job wasn’t as hot a ticket as you guys seem to think), but also to come in and compete for national titles every year, AND to slide right into the Carolina Way easy peasy… as if a guy like Nate Oates even knows what the F that is.
All because HD isn’t up to “standards.”This stuff is delusional.
I think you’re taking a real fear, losing what makes Carolina special, and stretching it into a conclusion that just doesn’t hold up. Saying that moving on from Hubert Davis would “end” what Dean Smith started and Roy Williams carried forward assumes the program’s values are tied to a “genealogy” chart rather than to principles. What we call Carolina Basketball really did take shape under Dean. It meant success on the court, integrity and player development off it, and representing the university the right way. Those ideals are bigger than any one coaching line.
And part of honoring that legacy is being honest about all of its pillars. Success on the court was not optional under Dean. It was a central expectation. Competing for conference titles, making deep tournament runs, and maintaining a national standard were part of the foundation. Acknowledging that is not entitlement. It is recognizing the full standard he set.
Every person who became part of the so called “family” was, at one point, an outsider. The tree grew because people were brought in who embodied the values, not because they shared “DNA” with the bench. Acting like the line must remain unbroken ignores the very history you are trying to protect.
It also feels inconsistent to tell everyone they need to accept change in the modern game, NIL, transfers, roster turnover, and shifting expectations, while declaring that coaching lineage is the one sacred area where change equals collapse. If change is the reality everywhere else, why is this the one place we are supposed to pretend time stopped?
No one is arguing that Carolina should abandon its standards. It is the opposite. Wanting the program to live up to its historical expectations, success on the court and integrity off it, is not entitlement. That standard is part of the legacy. When the search for a new coach happens, the job is not to find a clone, someone who’s “lineage” can be traced back to Coach Smith. It is to find someone who upholds those principles so the legacy continues to grow instead of sitting frozen in place.
Carolina Basketball, as Dean defined it, was never meant to be fragile. It was never meant to settle.