Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 118K
  • Politics 
He's publicly, as he always has, taking an anti-Israel position. He cares that he believes the US is doing Israel's bidding. He cares that he thinks the Jews control Republicans and Trump and that is the reason for attacking Iran.

Is that the Dem position that he's moved to?
The Dem position is no wars. Period. I would also hope that our position regarding being led around the nose by another dictator to do their bidding would apply to all dictators out there that Trump seems to be in love with: Putin, Orban, Bibi, etc.

You seem to be edging around the issue you really want to talk about: Your misguided belief that Democrats are antisemitic , and suddenly have a kindred spirit in Fuentes. That is completely false and you know it. Pointing out Nick Fuentes and saying, "Wow, when you've lost this guy..." isn't the same thing as signal boosting him and agreeing with him.

And you can be anti-Bibi without being antisemitic. Just so you know.
 
Regarding those 3 F15s that were shot down over Kuwait, supposedly by “friendly fire”, I am highly skeptical. What are the odds that not one, not two, but three get shot down by “friendly fire”? Iran has no ability to strike Kuwait via jet because its Air Force is completely decimated. So we are supposed to believe that somebody in Kuwait was so afraid of the nonexistent Iranian Air Force that they managed to shoot down not one, not two, but 3 F15s?
 
Regarding those 3 F15s that were shot down over Kuwait, supposedly by “friendly fire”, I am highly skeptical. What are the odds that not one, not two, but three get shot down by “friendly fire”? Iran has no ability to strike Kuwait via jet because its Air Force is completely decimated. So we are supposed to believe that somebody in Kuwait was so afraid of the nonexistent Iranian Air Force that they managed to shoot down not one, not two, but 3 F15s?
Seems shady, but at least everyone survived and is ok.
 
If we didn't start the war, who did?
It was always burning since the world’s been turning? [see that I am late to that one]

Less snarky lyric meming, the MAGA position is that Iran started this in 1979 and Trump is (finally) finishing it. Not sure why 1979 is the start instead of the 1950s coup by the CIA, or something before that, but Hegseth is speaking MAGA.
 
It was always burning since the world’s been turning? [see that I am late to that one]

Less snarky lyric meming, the MAGA position is that Iran started this in 1979 and Trump is (finally) finishing it. Not sure why 1979 is the start instead of the 1950s coup by the CIA, or something before that, but Hegseth is speaking MAGA.
Could go back to the 30s when the British first put the shah in power. Western powers have been messing with them before and since but that was the first puppet ruler I'm aware of. This is the third time we've overthrown a native government there to install a puppet. It would seem they'd be used to it.
 
I hope I’m wrong, but from everything I’m reading, it sounds like we and Israel are getting our asses handed to us by an enemy we completely underestimated, had no respect for, did not plan for, and have no means of de-escalation now.
 
Regarding those 3 F15s that were shot down over Kuwait, supposedly by “friendly fire”, I am highly skeptical. What are the odds that not one, not two, but three get shot down by “friendly fire”? Iran has no ability to strike Kuwait via jet because its Air Force is completely decimated. So we are supposed to believe that somebody in Kuwait was so afraid of the nonexistent Iranian Air Force that they managed to shoot down not one, not two, but 3 F15s?
 
Back
Top