Iran Catch-All | IRAN WAR

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 5K
  • Views: 139K
  • Politics 
You see no harm in iran having a nuke? You see no impact to American lives if they used that nuke?
I see no immediate or near future threat worth taking such a risk to our future and so antithetical to our beliefs than starting a war over religion. Screw that.
 
If I’m not mistaken, people have said the same about some of the opinion pieces you post here.
What little I post is nothing more than the other side of the coin that will never see the light of day here unless it is posted by a conservative. It is also a complete argument, not mindless tweets with no context or nuance.
 
The irony of Trump is that he is the most Persian president we have ever had, both in terms of his obsession with gold finishings and his over the top bluster.
Apparently that was an ancient Median characteristic that somewhat erroneously got attributed to ancient Persia.
 
Stop being such an asshole with this empty accusation.
cf is a shit talker. he can take care of himself. he also hasn't offered a single comment that shows he has the slightest understanding of the issues affecting this "war". As such, my comment is accurate. plenty of assholes on this thread. I'm trying to be inconspicuous. guess not though.
 
What little I post is nothing more than the other side of the coin that will never see the light of day here unless it is posted by a conservative. It is also a complete argument, not mindless tweets with no context or nuance.
When you get your news from Fox, etc., it shouldn't see the light of day. It's hyperpartisan nonsense. Fox News is basically the 'What have the Democrats done today that we think is bad?' news channel.
 
Last edited:
I see no immediate or near future threat worth taking such a risk to our future and so antithetical to our beliefs than starting a war over religion. Screw that.
Thankfully iran's neighbors don't agree. What would make you change your opinion on not seeing a near future threat?
 
When you get your news from Fox, etc., it shouldn't see the light of day. It's hyperpartisan nonsense. Fox News is basically the 'What the have the Democrats done today that we think is bad?' news channel.
so you never question what your news sources don't report? You should read both sides. You won't get the full story otherwise.
 
Thankfully iran's neighbors don't agree. What would make you change your opinion on not seeing a near future threat?
Somebody not Trump or Israel making the case. Neither of them have any credibility in the first place and particularly not in this case.

I can pretty much assure you that we have guaranteed unrest in that area for another century or next world war, whichever comes first.
 
Apparently that was an ancient Median characteristic that somewhat erroneously got attributed to ancient Persia.
I'm not talking about ancient Persia. I am talking about almost every Persian home I've entered in Southern California (the Iranian population in this part of the country is huge). It may not be 100%, but there is a very strong correlation between Iranian heritage and love of gold finishings.
 
You see no harm in iran having a nuke? You see no impact to American lives if they used that nuke?
There are so many reasons to take military action against Iran. Nukes. Rebuilding their nuke facility after we bombed it. Funding terrorism around the world. Slaughtering tens of thousands of protesters.

Iran is weak right now. If there's a good time to take action, this is it.
 
I don't want to see Iran possess nuclear weapons, but I think it is highly unlikely they use one if they had them. Their only real value to Iran would be their deterrent value. See, for example, North Korean nuclear weapons.
why does iran need nukes as a deterrent? no other country in the ME has nukes except israel (pretty obvious why). has israel expressed a desire to wipe iran off the map? north korea isn't remotely comparable to iran. north korea hasn't publicly stated their sole purpose is to wipe another country off the map and death to america. north korea didn't attack israel 2 years ago. north korea isn't sitting in the middle of the one thing on earth that drives the world's economy. this board seems oblivious to what would happen if iran actually used a nuke and the impact to our economy and the lives that would be affected by those most vulnerable to a bad economy. to think iran wouldn't use a nuke on israel is pretty naive in my opinion. we just disagree.
 
There are so many reasons to take military action against Iran. Nukes. Rebuilding their nuke facility after we bombed it. Funding terrorism around the world. Slaughtering tens of thousands of protesters.

Iran is weak right now. If there's a good time to take action, this is it.
preaching to the choir. I'm shocked at the number of people here who are actually sympathetic to iran.
 
preaching to the choir. I'm shocked at the number of people here who are actually sympathetic to iran.
I'm not sympathetic to Iran in any way whatsoever. But where are the nukes? Neither Rubio nor Trump mentioned it. It was either Israel was going to attack Iran (Rubio) or Iran was going to attack Israel (Trump). Which is it? Who should I believe? You?
 
Back
Top