Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1. Longevity may not be a primary component of greatness, but surely there is a point where extraordinary longevity matters. What if Lebron were to play to 50 (he won't; I think he retires this year)?The only way Lebron has an argument over MJ is if you believe longevity and counting stats are a primary component of greatness. Otherwise it's heavily tilted in MJ's favor.
It ain't like MJ is a prince in his personal life.I have MJ firmly ahead of Lebron in this discussion, but a lot of people let their personal disdain for Lebron cloud their judgement about where he stands compared to other all time greats.
I weight peak over longevity, personally, but also think you have to factor in both when discussing historical greatness. MJ's peak was better than anyone, and his 6-0 record in Finals with 6 Finals MVPs will never be beaten. But Lebron's peak - which came well before the "pace and space" revolution - is also historically insane (in a 5-year stretch from 2008-2013 he had 4 MVPs, 3 Finals appearances, 2 titles, 2 Finals MVPs, and if you like advanced stats he led the league in PER, win shares, WS/48, BPM, and VORP every single one of those years), and he absolutely deserves credit for the fact that he's maintained such an incredibly high level of play despite such an incredibly heavy load (most minutes played in history, most playoff games played in history, most total games between regular season/playoffs in history). He's been so good, for so long, that everyone has essentially become numb to his greatness.The only way Lebron has an argument over MJ is if you believe longevity and counting stats are a primary component of greatness. Otherwise it's heavily tilted in MJ's favor.
I think this is a great, great post and was what I would have said (and more) about MJ vs LBJ.I weight peak over longevity, personally, but also think you have to factor in both when discussing historical greatness. MJ's peak was better than anyone, and his 6-0 record in Finals with 6 Finals MVPs will never be beaten. But Lebron's peak - which came well before the "pace and space" revolution - is also historically insane (in a 5-year stretch from 2008-2013 he had 4 MVPs, 3 Finals appearances, 2 titles, 2 Finals MVPs, and if you like advanced stats he led the league in PER, win shares, WS/48, BPM, and VORP every single one of those years), and he absolutely deserves credit for the fact that he's maintained such an incredibly high level of play despite such an incredibly heavy load (most minutes played in history, most playoff games played in history, most total games between regular season/playoffs in history). He's been so good, for so long, that everyone has essentially become numb to his greatness.
Tl;dr: I think the argument that Jordan is the GOAT over him is an easier case to make, but I also think Lebron has a lot more than longevity and counting stats that make him great. I think it's easier to make a case for Lebron as #1 than to make a case for anyone else as #2.
I think this is a great, great post and was what I would have said (and more) about MJ vs LBJ.
I would say that one thing we're going to have to look at - in a few years if things stay as they are going now, if not already - is the career of Nikola Jokic. He's doing things over multiple seasons that no one player has really thought about doing and is being used in a way that other players haven't previously been used. It's led to a case where his individual stats - both counting and advanced - are absolutely insane.

Well, part of the issue now is that the NBA has basically stopped calling offensive fouls, and the gather step rule has made legal what used to be considered traveling. So it's a different game.I think this is a great, great post and was what I would have said (and more) about MJ vs LBJ.
I would say that one thing we're going to have to look at - in a few years if things stay as they are going now, if not already - is the career of Nikola Jokic. He's doing things over multiple seasons that no one player has really thought about doing and is being used in a way that other players haven't previously been used. It's led to a case where his individual stats - both counting and advanced - are absolutely insane.
I saw a highlight of him the other day throwing a lob pass for an alley-oop. The play was completed but it wasn't a good pass -- it was too high. I'm like, "you're not throwing to yourself dude."I hope Wemby can stay healthy throughout his career. He is truly amazing and can do a lot of things no one else could or can.
If Jokic retired tomorrow, he would already have arguably the greatest offensive peak of any player in the sport. He's led the league in most of the advanced states for the last five seasons, just like that Lebron stretch. But the fact that he only has one title and has never made an all-defensive team will mean he's probably more likely to be in "offensive GOAT" than "overall GOAT" discussions. If he wins 2+ titles in the next 4 years, we may need to reassess, but it will be interesting to see how his body holds up in the 30s.I think this is a great, great post and was what I would have said (and more) about MJ vs LBJ.
I would say that one thing we're going to have to look at - in a few years if things stay as they are going now, if not already - is the career of Nikola Jokic. He's doing things over multiple seasons that no one player has really thought about doing and is being used in a way that other players haven't previously been used. It's led to a case where his individual stats - both counting and advanced - are absolutely insane.
It is. See.No it’s not.
The best ability is availability. LeBron has had more "great" seasons than MJ did.The only way Lebron has an argument over MJ is if you believe longevity and counting stats are a primary component of greatness. Otherwise it's heavily tilted in MJ's favor.
He is amazing.I hope Wemby can stay healthy throughout his career. He is truly amazing and can do a lot of things no one else could or can.
I don't think this is true. LeBron isn't a compiler. He's just had a historically great career.The only way Lebron has an argument over MJ is if you believe longevity and counting stats are a primary component of greatness. Otherwise it's heavily tilted in MJ's favor.
This dude is the biggest hater. He's like... the Michael Jordan of haters.
Isaiah hated Jordan long before the Dream Team. People forget that Isaiah is from Chicago and generally felt that it was his city, despite spurring DePaul and leaving to go to Indiana.Jordan and Isaiah have a mutual hate for years. Jordan kept him off the Dream Team in 1992. Jordan said it's either him or me.
I love LeBron. Love his game. He plays like that in Karl Malone’s physique. He gives MJ a run for GOAT but moving around a lot undermined that (building teams repeatedly and maybe because he played with some other HOF guys in Miami).The only way Lebron has an argument over MJ is if you believe longevity and counting stats are a primary component of greatness. Otherwise it's heavily tilted in MJ's favor.