- Messages
- 1,525
What fucking Iranian nuke? And no, I don't think any nuke is getting used by anyone in the Middle East.
Israel Hamas War, West Bank, Etc. | Hostilities resume
- Thread starter nycfan
- Start date
- Replies: 2K
- Views: 84K
- Politics
- Messages
- 1,525
Yet you're the one saying that you don't think all Palestinians are radicals...then you say they're "already radicalized". Which is it?
The nukes that Iran has been trying to develop for years now. Hamas would absolutely use it, they have proven they don’t give a damn about Palestinian or Israeli lives.
I said a “group of people”. Not “Palestinians”. The group of people I am referring to are the already radicalized people who support Hamas.
There were a lot of Germans and Japanese who hated the US in 1945. Ten years later we were best friends. Money talks. Most people, when choosing between revenge and destruction or peace and prosperity for their families will choose the latter.
- Messages
- 1,525
And those are clearly not the people being referred to when a poster says Israel is creating terrorists. If you think any Palestinian alive right now watching their family starve to death who will ever forgive the Israelis, you're out of your freaking mind. And for that, I surely don't blame them...to borrow a phrase
They don’t have to forgive anyone. They simply have to recognize that it is not in their best interests to return to the warfare that ended up with them watching their family members starve.
As it stands, Israel has been dealing with terrorist attacks for its entire existence. They will tolerate a one off event every now or then in the future. That’s nothing new for them. They will never tolerate another 10/7.
- Messages
- 1,525
You have absolutely no idea how humans think and react, do you? Israel increases the odds of major terrorist actions with every passing day. Even the kindest people can be radicalized by barbaric treatment.
Please name a country that has nuclear weapons which has supplied another organization, particularly a terrorist one, with nuclear bombs.
ZenMode
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 4,118
I’m glad he’s taking time from barely staying alive to Tweet.
They should be concerned about what comes after Hamas.
If someone is radicalized but can’t or won’t do anything about it, then that is a moot point. As I said earlier, a lot of Germans and Japanese hated us in 1946. Didn’t matter.
The notion that because something has never happened before it is nothing to worry about in the future has been proven naive countless times. You don’t wait until there is a mushroom cloud over your city to say “I guess we should have done something about that”.
I’m 36 and cannot think of a single one of my peers who isn’t appalled by what Israel is doing. Almost all of us have young children, so it hits hard. Several of the ones I’m close enough with to have a more in-depth conversation about it with have said US support of Israel is one of their top issues right now and would love to vote for a candidate who at a minimum would curtail military aid.
And although none of these people are MAGA republicans, I wouldn’t categorize them as far left. Most of us voted for McCain and Romney.
RaiGuy
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 680
What’s crazy is that the same people that justify a genocide with the excuse of October 7th
what’s your point? Are you claiming they’re faking? He’s a journalist and is getting the story out. It doesn’t take much much energy to post a few sentences. What else is he supposed to do? It shows your true colors that you question the tweet rather than condemning Israel for starving an entire population.
ZenMode
Inconceivable Member
- Messages
- 4,118
I question any/all social media posts. Especially those that don't appear to make sense.
There is no "rather than". Two things can be true at the same time.
I've already said, multiple times,I don't agree with Israel denying aid.
What you should be condemning is Hamas using aid stations to try to kill Israeli soldiers.
RaiGuy
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 680
That sentence doesn’t even make sense.
It’s also already been debunked that Hamas is stealing aid.
Batt Boy
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 686
his remorseless killer released
en.wikipedia.org
Charles R. Ray - Wikipedia
superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 9,026
This was literally Condi Rice's argument for invading Iraq. If this is your position, omg you are lost.
You don't believe that anything has ever happened for the first time?
superrific
Legend of ZZL
- Messages
- 9,026
This is your theory? This is the series of events you are imagining.
1. Iran starts enriching uranium for a nuke more or less after the invasion of Iraq. There might have been some halting efforts before that, but they ramped it up because they realized that it was the only way to guarantee they won't be invaded next.
2. Iran gives up its weapon enrichment program in favor of a diplomatic solution that involved trying to a quasi-peaceful foreign policy.
3. Trump rips up the deal, and Iran starts enriching more. They especially start enriching more when he returns to office.
4. All in all, Iran has spent tens of billions of dollars making a nuke for self-defense. It's taken two decades at least. It's been their primary domestic weapons program.
5. But instead of keeping it, they are going to gift this device -- for which they have paid so much in blood and treasure -- to Hamas, with the expectation that Hamas will use it offensively against Israel.
6. They are going to do this despite the fact that smuggling a nuclear weapon is exceedingly difficult for a number of reasons, and if they get caught, everything they have done will be for naught;
7. They are going to do this even though the use of the bomb by Hamas would be the end of Iran.
8. They are going to do this even though Hamas has no way of deploying it. Nuclear bombs are considerably less effective if detonated at ground level. So it would not be nearly as devastating as people might think, but Iran is going ahead with this plan. Also, Hamas could get caught with the bomb, as it's quite different than giving some dynamite or an AK to barely trained fighters.
9. Hamas will do this even though it risks destroying the holy land for which Hamas is fighting. Not only would the holy grounds be destroyed; the surrounding area will be more or less unlivable.
10. This is going to happen even though the purpose of the Iranian proxies is to create the cheapest, most expendable fighting force possible. That's why they used suicide bombing. It costs almost nothing to put a small bomb in a backpack of some young man who climbs aboard a bus and detonates it. It requires no training. It requires no money. But now, having nurtured these proxies, Iran is going to hand them tens of billions of dollars worth of weaponry.
And this line of reasoning is how you justify genocide? This is why people think you are racist. What you are saying to justify mass starvation is something that makes no sense at all. Small children would scoff at this. Skeletor had more sensible schemes. Maybe you are just this stupid, but more likely, you just do not care (or celebrate) what is happening to people you do not care about at all.