HintonJamesHeel
Esteemed Member
- Messages
- 706
Just looked and Iran is claiming victory in the battle with Israel and leader is claiming ceasefire still on.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Confusion over possible drone strike in Iran:
Meanwhile:
Iran’s President Tells Aliyev to Investigate Use of Azerbaijani Airspace to Attack Iran
“… Since Israel’s June 13 attack on Iran, several Iranian analysts and experts have alleged that the Israeli government used Azerbaijani territory to carry out some of the airstrikes.
Ehsan Movahedian, a South Caucasus expert and international relations scholar at Tehran’s Allameh Tabataba’i University (ATU), told Armenpress Monday that he has evidence supporting claims that Israel utilized Azerbaijani soil for its operations.
He cited eyewitness reports of drones entering Iranian airspace from Azerbaijan….”
Agree, and it's especially hard when people in the administration (and many outside) are constantly using social media declarations to undermine and contradict reporting that's being done by journalists who actually work really hard to fact check, such as the NYT and CNN.The social media aspect of 2025 conflicts makes getting details borderline impossible. What are “unofficial” sources other than folks online? It’s a waiting game to see what they find I guess.
Totally agree about Trump and his insistence to just make stuff up and then stick to it but in this case it was a random Twitter link saying Israel had broken ceasefire and look how quickly folks on this board and on X picked it up and immediately believed it.Agree, and it's especially hard when people in the administration (and many outside) are constantly using social media declarations to undermine and contradict reporting that's being done by journalists who actually work really hard to fact check, such as the NYT and CNN.
I know. It's a problem in both directions. I don't think it's an EQUAL problem in both directions, but we'd all do well to be more suspicious of "breaking news" unless it's from highly reputable journalists who have strict confirmation and factchecking standards.Totally agree about Trump and his insistence to just make stuff up and then stick to it but in this case it was a random Twitter link saying Israel had broken ceasefire and look how quickly folks on this board and on X picked it up and immediately believed it.
I think in this country Trump and his loons are more in front of us so we see it constantly and we are almost 10 years into it so we are just done with it. With that said, go on X and look into Gaza/Israel. It’s pretty clear the Palestinian wing does an amazing job just filling social media with constant stories about Israel and how evil they are. Now I’m sure the premise of some of those stories might be accurate but it’s a lot of “sources say Israel did this” and the account has like 100 people. Also another common thing is “I know people on the ground in Palestine and they say it’s not being reported but….” It’s pretty rampant.I know. It's a problem in both directions. I don't think it's an EQUAL problem in both directions, but we'd all do well to be more suspicious of "breaking news" unless it's from highly reputable journalists who have strict confirmation and factchecking standards.
My only exposure to X is what nycfan is gracious enough to post here, so I'll take your word for it. I just think we don't do well when we try to equivalate in any way disinformation spread by random people on a notoriously unreliable social media platform and disinformation regurgitated constantly by every level of our Article II national leadership.I think in this country Trump and his loons are more in front of us so we see it constantly and we are almost 10 years into it so we are just done with it. With that said, go on X and look into Gaza/Israel. It’s pretty clear the Palestinian wing does an amazing job just filling social media with constant stories about Israel and how evil they are. Now I’m sure the premise of some of those stories might be accurate but it’s a lot of “sources say Israel did this” and the account has like 100 people. Also another common thing is “I know people on the ground in Palestine and they say it’s not being reported but….” It’s pretty rampant.
It’s like when Trump says “folks are saying.” The folks are Trump and he just made it up.
Totally fair. I think this conversation started though based on a link from X that Israel had attached Iran and posters here were implying ceasefire is over now because of it. The point is how quickly people believed something that was being reported on X.My only exposure to X is what nycfan is gracious enough to post here, so I'll take your word for it. I just think we don't do well when we try to equivalate in any way disinformation spread by random people on a notoriously unreliable social media platform and disinformation regurgitated constantly by every level of our Article II national leadership.
Look it up. You’ll see it published tomorrow. Obliterated!
Is it too cynical of me to suggest that "unofficial" online sources are no less reliable than WH/administration sources ?
Let me guess (that is if it's even true) - Fetterman and his stroke riddled brain.Dem senator, in a classified hearing today, told Kane this was the greatest bombing raid in the history of the Air Force.
pretty good guessLet me guess (that is if it's even true) - Fetterman and his stroke riddled brain.
it’s funny how the world is. When Fetterman was running just after his stroke, so many said it was fine and so many said he was unfit. He’s said a couple of things and groups on both sides have totally flipped on endorsing or criticizing.Let me guess (that is if it's even true) - Fetterman and his stroke riddled brain.
Good to know. Many Dems appear to be pulling against the US due to their hatred of Trump.You do understand that 99% of people on this board and in this country want the sites to have actually been obliterated, correct? It’s not an indictment on Trump if they weren’t and it’s also not an endorsement of him if they were. The US has a strong military with lots of firepower that can blow stuff up. If we are going to strike (and we did), it might as well have been effective.
The issue is and always has been that Trump should have just said we will see. It sounds like his initial report was wrong. It sounds like the 24 hour report from CNN was also wrong. It sounds like somewhere in the middle but no one is running around hoping the strikes didn’t work.
It was Senator Mullin from Oklahoma in an interview with Hannity.This is your brain on Fox.
We can’t go in again, as doing so would be an admission the site wasn’t obliterated.Good to know. Many Dems appear to be pulling against the US due to their hatred of Trump.
Iran has no air defense, so if we need to go in again we can and Iran won't even get a shot off. Iran must be shell shocked at this point.
You obviously don’t speak Trump-ese. If we go in again, Trump (and Fox and Ram and the other mouthpieces) would just say it is extra obliterated. The obliteration is obliterated.We can’t go in again, as doing so would be an admission the site wasn’t obliterated.