Many Americans Say the Democratic Party Does Not Share Their Priorities

  • Thread starter Thread starter altmin
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 560
  • Views: 19K
  • Politics 
No, I'm not a transphobe, nor am I bad at math. I've just continued to recognize what the entirety of the country recognized, prior to the recent progressive movement. Males and females are different and they should not compete against each other.

Democrats have always been big on following the science. Well, why would you stop now?
The science? The science that states clearly that gender is not binary?

Maybe you want to look through history at all of the things that the country recognized that turned out to be wrong.

Remember the Catholic church believed left-handed people were sinners.
 
The science? The science that states clearly that gender is not binary?

Maybe you want to look through history at all of the things that the country recognized that turned out to be wrong.

Remember the Catholic church believed left-handed people were sinners.
That sounds sinister.
 
The science? The science that states clearly that gender is not binary?

Maybe you want to look through history at all of the things that the country recognized that turned out to be wrong.

Remember the Catholic church believed left-handed people were sinners.
Only those with a hairy left palm.
 
The science? The science that states clearly that gender is not binary?

Maybe you want to look through history at all of the things that the country recognized that turned out to be wrong.

Remember the Catholic church believed left-handed people were sinners.
The science conclusively defines the clear differences between males and females. Not just humans, either.
 
So let me guess - Zen is still arguing that if only Democrats abandoned transgender people that they would win more elections? Even if they did that social conservatives wouldn't vote Democratic - they'd just say that Democrats also needed to abandon and publicly renounce all LGBTQ people and "femnazis" and any social liberalism before they "might" consider voting Democratic (and they still wouldn't). It's a dead-end argument and excuse that Republicans use to justify voting against Democrats in pretty much every election cycle. If only Democrats turned into Republicans they might actually vote for them, even though they still wouldn't.
 
Last edited:
The science conclusively defines the clear differences between males and females. Not just humans, either.
Really, explain the fish that are all born female and transition to males later or the other animals that will transition if their population becomes out of balance. Or the humans that are intersexed or born with both sex organs?

Dude we know your homophobic and transphobic. You be you, but don't expect anyone to have any respect for your opinion.
 
So let me guess - Zen is still arguing that if only Democrats abandoned transgender people that they would win more elections? Even if they did that social conservatives wouldn't vote Democratic - they'd just say that Democrats also needed to abandon and publicly renounce all LGBTQ people and "femnazis" and any social liberalism before the "might" consider voting Democratic (and they still wouldn't). It's a dead-end argument and excuse that Republicans use to justify voting against Democrats in pretty much every election cycle. If only Democrats turned into Republicans they might actually vote for them, even though they still wouldn't.
Doesn't matter about zen, he was one of 234 that voted for his cousin. He really showed both parties.
 
Inflation skyrocketing
GDP crashing
Tariffs rising
Stock Market tanking
Pandemics spreading
Air traffic controller shortage
FBI, CIA, USAID shrinking, increasing external threats, terrorism
Russia and Putin advancing
Trading partners waving goodbye
losing science, technology, research jobs to China, Canada, Europe...


...and the "Dems/libs are being owned" because some fake Republicans don't have a handle on biology (fish, jellyfish, mammals, humans) or scientific evidence.
 
So let me guess - Zen is still arguing that if only Democrats abandoned transgender people that they would win more elections? Even if they did that social conservatives wouldn't vote Democratic - they'd just say that Democrats also needed to abandon and publicly renounce all LGBTQ people and "femnazis" and any social liberalism before the "might" consider voting Democratic (and they still wouldn't). It's a dead-end argument and excuse that Republicans use to justify voting against Democrats in pretty much every election cycle. If only Democrats turned into Republicans they might actually vote for them, even though they still wouldn't.


Exactly. There's a pillar of the yt supremacist base under the spell of the magic r....

Hillary called them deplorable and they voted for *a* conman.

Trump called them dumb and they voted for *the* conman.
 
Don’t really have a purpose for sharing this other than to laugh at what an unfortunate looking woman she is. As dukeman said the other day, she looks like her family tree is a wreath.

 
Don’t really have a purpose for sharing this other than to laugh at what an unfortunate looking woman she is. As dukeman said the other day, she looks like her family tree is a wreath.


I'm not going to argue with you but I've seen better pictures of her.
 
As disgusting as Trump is, Vance drew most of ire last night. Such a douche. Still, it was sad how impotent the Dems were sitting there with their placards and eye rolls. I think they are still focused on the wrong things. Very little hope for our future unless new Dem leadership emerges.
 
Back
Top