Welcome to our community

Be apart of something great, join today!

Minnesota assasination thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter altmin
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 638
  • Views: 14K
  • Politics 
The two couples sitting behind me at lunch were spewing the Walz conspiracy theory and discussing how “Representative” [sic] Padilla forced his way into Noem’s press conference and “charged” the podium. I had to move before I heard the rest. I so wanted to turn around to set them straight, but knew that would be a waste of my breath. I chose to salvage my sanity instead. They walk along us.

Against my better judgment, I attended a Father’s Day dinner with my wife today. Five minutes in, my brother in laws father asks “what’s with this no kings day bullshit? There are some dumb people out there” I looked at him and said, you got that right. And walked away.
 
In these situations I always wonder if such comments are disingenuousness on behalf of partisanship or if the person is legitimately that dense.
In this case it is 100% partisanship. This person is indeed involved in politics but on a state level not national. I envision this person getting their talking points from state leadership and then spewing the party line for his followers to get and on it goes from there. But he does a great job selling he believes all of it.
 
I so wanted to turn around to set them straight, but knew that would be a waste of my breath. I chose to salvage my sanity instead.
You say you'll change the constitution
Well, you know
We all want to change your head
You tell me it's the institution
Well, you know
You'd better free your mind instead
 
Facts no longer matter. People believe what they want to be true and can find a source to fill that need.

It’s a never ending loop and there doesn’t appear to be much desire to break it.
He told them to look at me, look at me close. That the closer they looked, the less sense it would all make. That I wasn't the kind of guy to kill a guy, that I was the barber, for Christ's sake. I was just like them, an ordinary man. Guilty of living in a world that had no place for me, yeah. Guilty of wanting to be a dry cleaner, sure. But not of murder. He said I was modern man. And if they voted to convict me, they'd be practically cinching the noose around their own necks. He told them to look not at the facts, but at the meaning of the facts. And then he said the facts had no meaning. It was a pretty good speech. Even had me going, until Frankie interrupted it.
 
Spotted by a camera near his farm?


I know I am reading way too much into a brief social media post, . . ., but if he was spotted on a camera that he himself had set up on his farm in some sort of paranoid delusion that it would give him advance notice of when the "Government" was coming for him, that would be just so sweet.
 
Glad he was caught alive.

Time for some excellent interrogators to question him.

He doesn’t look like a 57 year-old who has been on the run for close to 48 hours and who has covered a lot of miles from the location of the 2nd shooting.

I’m betting he had help between the 2nd shooting location and getting his other car.
 
In these situations I always wonder if such comments are disingenuousness on behalf of partisanship or if the person is legitimately that dense.
At some level, it's both.

A key part of being a Republican under Trump is being to willing to accept and parrot the lies that undergird the party and its ideology. Believing the "alternative facts" are a key piece of belonging within the party under Trump. And even when forced to confront the actual facts of any given situation, the true believer will continue to claim the "alternative facts" despite how much it is obvious they are false.

Of course, this is much more easily done by those who are intensely dense and therefore more of these true believers are legitimately that dense.

See, in this very thread, Ramrouser as proof of concept.
 
Back
Top