October 18 "No Kings" Protest

  • Thread starter Thread starter donbosco
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 347
  • Views: 9K
  • Politics 
Perhaps a coincidence, but made me think of this thread…

“… Trump on Monday praised the leadership of his Egyptian counterpart [president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi], whose rule is considered authoritarian by human rights groups.

“If he has crime, he puts it out very quickly,” Trump said. “Some people think that’s not nice. But I think that’s great, because people don’t want to be mugged and smashed and be stupid people.”

The former commander-in-chief of Egypt’s armed forces, Sisi led the 2013 coup against democratically elected president Mohamed Morsi. Under Sisi’s command as defense minister, Egyptian security forces carried out the the Rabaa massacre and other mass killings of civilian protesters. His 2014 election was marred by repression of his political opponents.

At a 2019 G-7 summit, Trump called Sisi “my favorite dictator.”“

 
Sounds like something a King’s royal servant would say.
OMG. I want the constitution to be amended with things like no gerrymandering, but I might be willing to settle for "no gratuitous attacks on the mainstream media." I am so fucking tired of that phrase and I am certain I'm not the only one. I think we are all tired of this constant pivoting back to the dumbest conspiracy theory of them all. Well, one of them. It's hard to top QAnon.
 
OMG. I want the constitution to be amended with things like no gerrymandering, but I might be willing to settle for "no gratuitous attacks on the mainstream media." I am so fucking tired of that phrase and I am certain I'm not the only one. I think we are all tired of this constant pivoting back to the dumbest conspiracy theory of them all. Well, one of them. It's hard to top QAnon.
How would you legislate against gerrymandering? All districts are gerrymandered to a point. That is a bit like obscenity.
 
How would you legislate against gerrymandering? All districts are gerrymandered to a point. That is a bit like obscenity.
Run a simulation with 1,000 (or 10,000, or 100,000) possible districting scenarios for each state. Have the computer pair those down to the most logical result. Treat it like weather prediction.

 
How would you legislate against gerrymandering? All districts are gerrymandered to a point. That is a bit like obscenity.
I'm not sure why you would be expecting a well-developed theory from "things like no gerrymandering" in an offhand comment.

There are a variety of ways of doing no gerrymandering. One is a process. A second is multi-member districts. But it's hard to specify zero gerrymandering when gerrymandering is built into the constitution via state boundaries.

I would lean toward the process definition itself. Admittedly the process would be a little bit granular for a constitution, but you could write something like, "districts shall be drawn according to a process set by Congress with the following properties:"

Thing is, there's no perfect solution but there are solutions better than what we have. It's like, I'm not exactly sure who should be our football coach and it's probably folly to attempt to specify the exact attributes for a coach we want, but anything is better than BB.
 
I attended the last one, took my guitar and sang Woody Guthrie and Pete Seeger and Bob Dylan stuff…
Can’t go to the one on Saturday, I have a paid gig out of town which also starts at noon at a winery up in the High Country. I’ll miss it. But I still plan on singing some Bob Dylan and Woody… and a new anti-government protest song called “Heavy Foot”. Cool tune.
Just googled Heavy Foot. Love it!
 
Back
Top