- Messages
- 29,351
GOP is increasingly likely to hold, though still a lot of counting to go.calling on nycfan...
Do we know where the results in the House stand at this point ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GOP is increasingly likely to hold, though still a lot of counting to go.calling on nycfan...
Do we know where the results in the House stand at this point ?
Frankly, it may be better for Trump to have all three levers of power (four if you count the court) for the first two years. If past is prologue, then 2026 could be a repeat of 2018.It was never likely, at all, that the Dems would take the House if Kamala lost. It was even less likely with that margin of victory. We aren't going to get the House.
I've been watching election returns a long time. This is ALWAYS how Nevada goes. I feel like I've seen these exact same margins many times. 80% of the vote, Pub leads by a few thousand, and then the Dem takes it as the last votes are counted. It's like every election there.Rosen squeaks out a win.
Oh goodie...a better society...when we are all dead.I agree with your sentiment, in principle. However, with at least one branch of gov held by blue I think democracy is the patient on a respirator with faint potentials detected on EEG - in that case, there's hope, if ever so scant. With red taking on authoritarian hegemony the same patient has zero EEG activity, and is effectively a mechanically sustained bag of cells and fluids, with no chance of recovery.
The only silver lining I see is the coming destruction allows a completely different, and more progressive, country(s) to form in 3-4 decades. In the interregnum, I think violence, rapid expansion of mass detainment, gross human rights abuses, and corruption will define the US.
Yep. That’s exactly what they want. And exactly what they said they’d hope would happen. Elon Musk quite literally and quite explicitly said just last week that we’d need to experience some economic pain and hardship in the “short term” and millions upon millions of people who have whined and cried the loudest about the price of everything ran right to the polls and voted for it. Got to give the voters what they want.I think default is viewed favorably by thiel and musk.
Oh yeah I hear you and both respect and appreciate your perspective. I don’t mean to seem sanguine or careless about it. I just mean that I just try not to worry about the things outside of my control. Not saying that’s right or wrong, just that it’s what’s best for me personally to maintain the happiness, joy, and optimism with which I generally try to conduct my life.I hear you.
Also, if default happens, we're talking great(er) depression suffering. My point and opinion (from an obvious cynic), I think the sentiment that a fully red government will serve as an excellent means of teaching often comes from folks with a sanguine perspective on the severity of the impending impacts.
I'm constantly attempting to check myself with respect to accepting, even inviting, the inevitable hardships to come vs. extrapolating out the humanitarian disaster(s) I think evidence points to, and realizing "I don't want that for anyone". It's why I can't get behind the overall FAFO attitude, as I think it underestimates what's to come.
Looking ahead - NC appears key to Dems having a chance to retake Senate by 2028:
they need to win 3 of the following 4 races: ME 2026, NC 2026, WI 2028, NC 202 Seems doable