Protection Of Women And Girls In Sports Act

  • Thread starter Thread starter Callatoroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 196
  • Views: 4K
  • Politics 
Is this the appropriate point to interject that the very same people who are pushing this legislation already have a long history of multi-decade crusades that birth certificates are fake?
I have 3 kids (m & f) that played lots of local and school sports and one playing a collegiate sport. Birth certificates worked in every situation. Never heard any parent having a problem with using their kid's BC. In any case fixing any type of BC problem would seem more preferable to genital inspection wouldn't it?
 
Or simply take a birth certificate when you register your kid. Seems a little more simple, but doesn't provide the insulting and scary rhetoric so might not be as popular to those on the left.
Yeah man I love when the government forces my local YMCA youth league to require birth certificates to register. So small government. So important.
 
Don't need a do-over. This thread is about transgender men in women's sports. I'm not aware of what the SOS "just did" or why. Start a thread on that.
I think it is relevant to the point about whether republicans are really about protecting women or just hurting transgendered Americans.
If it was just about protecting women, why would this even be a thing?
 
I have 3 kids (m & f) that played lots of local and school sports and one playing a collegiate sport. Birth certificates worked in every situation. Never heard any parent having a problem with using their kid's BC. In any case fixing any type of BC problem would seem more preferable to genital inspection wouldn't it?
You are acting as if the kind of people whonpush these issues are sane. They are not.

The kind of people who push this are like the woman in Raleigh who posted a picture of a teacher in a tutu from spirit week and accused him of indoctrinating children. Ruined the guy's life and had HUNDREDS fangirling over her at school board meetings.

Just because you want to selectively ignore that this entire movement is rooted in radical hate mongers doesn't mean we all have to.
 
Isn't it the job of our elected officials to vote and operate in a way that represents their constituents of which 79% want a separation? Also if there is no difference why not go to having only one team per sport per school and males and females can try out for that one team.
About six-in-ten (63%) say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. This share has grown 4 percentage points since 2021 – the year prior to the 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that overturned Roe.
 
Isn't it the job of our elected officials to vote and operate in a way that represents their constituents of which 79% want a separation? Also if there is no difference why not go to having only one team per sport per school and males and females can try out for that one team.
Ahead of the 12th anniversary of the announcement of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) on Saturday, a substantial majority of Americans supports legislation that would offer legal pathways for Dreamers.

Among respondents to a new survey from the National Immigration Forum in conjunction with The Bullfinch Group, 68% of registered voters supported Republicans and Democrats working together on legislation that would enable Dreamers to earn legal status and eventual citizenship. Support for these solutions extended across party lines, with Republicans supporting such legislation by a 25-point margin.
 
Isn't it the job of our elected officials to vote and operate in a way that represents their constituents of which 79% want a separation? Also if there is no difference why not go to having only one team per sport per school and males and females can try out for that one team.
According to the Pew Research Center, over 60 percent of Americans believe that climate change is affecting their community directly. Three-quarters of Americans support U.S. participation in global efforts to curb climate change.
 
Sorry if this has been answered, what do transgender male (female transitioning to male) play? Does a 17 year old that is transitioning and on hormonal therapy but hasn’t had surgery then get to play womens sports? or are they just shit out of luck
 
Fwiw. The NC high school athletic association has been governing high school sports in this state since before any of us were born. Until this year.
The GOP passed a law so politicians now have control over NC high school sports. Why do you think they did this (Governor didn’t bother to veto because they have enough votes for it to be veto-proof)?
I’ll give you a hint why they did this: it is germane to this thread.

So, again, this should be handled by the governing bodies of each league or association or whatever, not the government be it the state government or federal government.
 
I think it is relevant to the point about whether republicans are really about protecting women or just hurting transgendered Americans.
If it was just about protecting women, why would this even be a thing?
Why would what be a thing? The sports issue or Rubio's actions on passports?
 
Sorry if this has been answered, what do transgender male (female transitioning to male) play? Does a 17 year old that is transitioning and on hormonal therapy but hasn’t had surgery then get to play womens sports? or are they just shit out of luck
I'm not in favor of shit out of luck. I would have no issue with tax money going to support a division of sports geared to serve trans males who want to play sports. If there is a demand then we should fund it.
 
You were making an argument that states should make the abortion decision. I don't believe the state or federal government should make a woman's medical decisions.
Well, obviously the issue at some point that is debatable brings a 2nd life into play. When that is I guess is up to an individuals beliefs. I fall somewhere in the middle of when that is.
 
You are acting as if the kind of people whonpush these issues are sane. They are not.

The kind of people who push this are like the woman in Raleigh who posted a picture of a teacher in a tutu from spirit week and accused him of indoctrinating children. Ruined the guy's life and had HUNDREDS fangirling over her at school board meetings.

Just because you want to selectively ignore that this entire movement is rooted in radical hate mongers doesn't mean we all have to.

That woman is new to you? You singled her out as your example to indict 77 million people of being full of trans hate? The internet is full of people posting disinformation. It's all over social media and has been since there has been a social media. That will NEVER change. Are you shocked by it? But the absolute worst of the worst and scum of the earth is when supposed journalist do it. I'm sure you agree.



Listen to the clip and then compare it to the caption at the top. Did you hear a threat to the pope? Intentional to inflame those who follow him? I don't need a clip of a republican journalist doing it. They do. I'm not denying it or pretending my side doesn't do it.

I have come to the conclusion that there is nothing I can say to make you reconsider that this, for a majority of republicans, is not rooted in hate. You will never consider anything but what's in your head so maybe more opportunity for discussion on another topic.
 
Well, obviously the issue at some point that is debatable brings a 2nd life into play. When that is I guess is up to an individuals beliefs. I fall somewhere in the middle of when that is.
Exactly, individual beliefs.

So, my opinion, your opinion, trump's opinion, do not matter to pregnant women having to work through the medical issues of pregnancy.
 
The passports.
I'm struggling to tie the two together (how the passport issue affects protecting or not protecting women). Obviously this falls in line with trump's EO of the official US stance on gender. I might see a tie to national security but it is a bit of a stretch.
 
Back
Top