Paine
Iconic Member
- Messages
- 1,759
No, in the same way that no one could point to a “working model” of a capitalist state prior to the collapse of feudalism in medieval Europe. That’s not how history works.Can you point me to a working model?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, in the same way that no one could point to a “working model” of a capitalist state prior to the collapse of feudalism in medieval Europe. That’s not how history works.Can you point me to a working model?
Hegseth also promised full transparency but then cut the livestream of the townhall as soon as Q&A began.Hegseth Uses His First Town Hall to Attack Diversity
The defense secretary, speaking to the Pentagon work force, defended his “unconventional approaches” to an audience that included women and people of color.
![]()
Hegseth Uses His First Town Hall to Attack Diversity
The defense secretary, speaking to the Pentagon work force, defended his “unconventional approaches” to an audience that included women and people of color.www.nytimes.com
“…
Speaking to a room filled with African Americans, Asian Americans, Latinos and white Americans, both men and women, he offered a full-throated attack on the military’s decades-long efforts to diversify.
“I think the single dumbest phrase in military history is ‘our diversity is our strength,’” said Mr. Hegseth, who served in the U.S. Army National Guard from 2001 to 2021 and is a former Fox News host.
He later added that he dismantled diversity, equity and inclusion policies at the Pentagon because they “served a purpose of dividing the force as opposed to uniting the force.”
… In recent years, the Pentagon has sought to increase the numbers of women and racial minorities in the military’s officer corps, so that it could become more representative of the enlisted force it leads. Mr. Hegseth has said such policies are unfair. …”
Giving birth is NOT a human universal event. Fifty percent of us can’t. Not all females give birth. Some want to and can’t. Some don’t want to and work to prevent pregnancy and still give birth. Some don’t want to and do. Many want to and do.This is such an interesting conversation. My own perspective is that I enjoy and value conversations that arise from diversity and identities, and feel that they're important to understand the history of the US and the context for where we are now.
On the other hand, they do tend towards separation and division. There's also a kind of weird competitiveness about them, so "Oh, you're a lesbian? Well, I'm a black lesbian" -> "Oh, you're a black lesbian? I'm a black lesbian who has epilepsy" kind of thing going on.
So while I value DEI stuff and see its importance, it's not being balanced by anything meaningful. So I'm rewriting my classes (big world civ survey classes) that start with human universals (death, sexual desire, grief, giving birth, anger, hunger, ego, etc) and have students investigate/interrogate cultures based on themes drawn from human universals. These are things that we all share in common, regardless of our race, religion, sexual orientation, economic status, etc.
I just started this last week...pretty interesting so far, but I'm going to end up writing my entire curricula around it. I'll let you know how it goes...
So, your stance is that the lack of a functioning society of this type is due to what? I'm honestly curious. Class and social divisions seem to me to be pretty endemic to most every member of the animal kingdom.No, in the same way that no one could point to a “working model” of a capitalist state prior to the collapse of feudalism in medieval Europe. That’s not how history works.
Giving birth is NOT a human universal event.
The human project is to rise above the state of animals. We have God-given ability to rationalize. Where does the rationality lead us? Towards the goal of human liberation.So, your stance is that the lack of a functioning society of this type is due to what? I'm honestly curious. Class and social divisions seem to me to be pretty endemic to most every member of the animal kingdom.
The trope of idealism being associated with youth needs to die. Who decided that aging should naturally come along with greater cynicism? I’m not going to live my life that way.I remember being an idealist. Then I turned 12.
I picked 12 because I had just seen a president assassinated, the reaction to the signing of the Civil Rights Act and Vietnam escalating. Yeah, my idealism and trust in society wore off pretty fucking fastThe trope of idealism being associated with youth needs to die. Who decided that aging should naturally come along with greater cynicism? I’m not going to live my life that way.
And no offense, the cynicism of your generation has produced some pretty disastrous political consequences. I’m suggesting that even justified cynicism is counterproductive for anyone that claims to be of the left. Allowing cynicism to override and define has, historically, not been a good thing.I picked 12 because I had just seen a president assassinated, the reaction to the signing of the Civil Rights Act and Vietnam escalating. Yeah, my idealism and trust in society wore off pretty fucking fast
Odds are exceptionally high that you will live your life that way no matter how you say or feel about it. You said above that capitalists are driven by forces beyond their control. I think idealism is largely in direct conflict with the reality that their are forces beyond our control. There are lots of forces beyond our control. Acceptance of that is not so much a loss of idealism as it is a realization of the realities of the human condition.The trope of idealism being associated with youth needs to die. Who decided that aging should naturally come along with greater cynicism? I’m not going to live my life that way.
Acceptance of that doesn’t have to be a loss of idealism, but, for many people, it is.Odds are exceptionally high that you will live your life that way no matter how you say or feel about it. You said above that capitalists are driven by forces beyond their control. I think idealism is largely in direct conflict with the reality that their are forces beyond our control. There are lots of forces beyond our control. Acceptance of that is not so much a loss of idealism as it is a realization of the realities of the human condition.
Let me me add to this that the biggest thing that separates us from other animals, the ability to record and pass down knowledge allows us to do the same with pernicious myths.Odds are exceptionally high that you will live your life that way no matter how you say or feel about it. You said above that capitalists are driven by forces beyond their control. I think idealism is largely in direct conflict with the reality that their are forces beyond our control. There are lots of forces beyond our control. Acceptance of that is not so much a loss of idealism as it is a realization of the realities of the human condition.
And while you believe that our ability to rationalize should separate us from all other members of Kingdom Animalia, I don't share that view at all. We are far from the only species to have rational thought. If anything, the drive for class, order, and division is heightened as a species becomes more sentient and rational. Humans are social animals. Social animals thrive on a class hierarchy. As much as we would like to think ourselves above that, we really haven't ever shown a penchant to do so or even move slightly in the direction of a classless existence.
More theoretical than realistic thoughI mean, there is a system of government and economics that is predicated on abolishing class.
I don’t care to argue about it here or elsewhere, but it’s obvious that I disagree with your view of the last 150 years. “It hasn’t happened, therefore it isn’t possible” is not sound logic.More theoretical than realistic though
ETA: I see you’ve discussed this with others. I’m not really trying to argue here but you would think the last 150 years have done a pretty good job of showing that a true classless society is not possible. Not to say that we can’t do better to lessen the differences between classes and shouldn’t try to do so.
A father’s experience during a pregnancy isn’t even close to a mother’s experience.Oh ffs. Pedantic much?
You should change your user name to "Ackschewally..."
A father’s experience during a pregnancy isn’t even close to a mother’s experience.
Let’s not equate motherhood with fatherhood as universal human experiences.
I would never vote for Paine for office but I actually do “like” him. I would rather get a beer with him than just about anyone on this board because he is thoughtful and respectful.HY doesn't "like" Paine or his ideas. He likes that Paine gets in the face of the rest of us from time to time. He likes any criticism of Democrats. If Paine were running for office, HY would label him Mao or Stalin before the sun set.
Embarrassingly racist.As a former professor at West Point this one pisses me off like no other. They didn’t disband the French, German, Italian, or Polish clubs, but they disbanded all of these? Insane.