Tariffs Catch-All

  • Thread starter Thread starter BubbaOtis
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 4K
  • Views: 136K
  • Politics 

Rachel Reeves, the chancellor (British Treasury Sec.), has said the UK’s trading relationship with the EU is “arguably even more important” than its relationship with the US. She made this comment in a BBC interview from Washington, where today she is meeting her US counterpart, Scott Bessant. Reeves told Faisal Islam:

I understand why there’s so much focus on our trading relationship with the US but actually our trading relationship with Europe is arguably even more important, because they’re our nearest neighbours and trading partners.

Obviously I’ve been meeting Scott Bessent this week whilst I’m in Washington, but I’ve also this week met the French, the German, the Spanish, the Polish, the Swedish, the Finnish finance ministers - because it is so important that we rebuild those trading relationships with our nearest neighbours in Europe, and we’re going to do that in a way that is good for British jobs and British consumers.
 

Canadians may soon find themselves shelling out more for new vehicles, and they have tariffs from Donald Trump to thank for it. The ripple effects of U.S. trade policies are about to wash over the auto market, and now the Canadian Automotive Dealers Association (CADA) is floating some bold, if unconventional, ideas to soften the blow.


Chief among them? Changing the rules of the game altogether by opening the doors to cars from Europe, Japan, and Korea, vehicles currently locked out by Canada’s alignment with U.S. regulations. That kind of move could not only reshape the Canadian car market but also throw a wrench into Trump’s tariff strategy.

At present, Canada’s vehicle safety and environmental standards are tightly synced with those of the United States. This regulatory mirroring makes sense for streamlining trade and manufacturing, but it comes with a big downside: it blocks the import of vehicles built to different standards, even if those cars are otherwise road-ready in markets like the EU or Japan. In practice, if a car isn’t designed for the American market, Canadians probably won’t see it on local lots.

...

Essentially, Canada would open up its ability to import cars that Americans can’t. Rather than pay tariffs on American vehicles, it would leverage its free trade agreements with other nations and could sidestep American cars.
 

China canceled 12,000 metric tons of United States pork shipments amid a high-stakes trade standoff between the superpowers, according to data released Thursday.

China, one of the biggest U.S. trading partners, axed 12,000 metric tons of U.S. pork orders, the data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) shows.

The move represents the biggest cancellation of pork orders since the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted supply chains and stalled economies around the world, Bloomberg News reported.

China, behind Mexico and Japan, was the U.S.’s third-biggest market for pork in 2024, importing some 475,000 metric tons valued at more than $1.1 billion.

China is the world’s biggest producer of pork, accounting for nearly 50 percent of global supply at around 57 million metric tons, according to the USDA. The U.S. was ranked third at 11 percent with 12 million metric tons.
 

China canceled 12,000 metric tons of United States pork shipments amid a high-stakes trade standoff between the superpowers, according to data released Thursday.

China, one of the biggest U.S. trading partners, axed 12,000 metric tons of U.S. pork orders, the data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) shows.

The move represents the biggest cancellation of pork orders since the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted supply chains and stalled economies around the world, Bloomberg News reported.

China, behind Mexico and Japan, was the U.S.’s third-biggest market for pork in 2024, importing some 475,000 metric tons valued at more than $1.1 billion.

China is the world’s biggest producer of pork, accounting for nearly 50 percent of global supply at around 57 million metric tons, according to the USDA. The U.S. was ranked third at 11 percent with 12 million metric tons.
That’s okay. We can just give the pork farmers some of that sweet, sweet bailout money that they love so much (as long as it is Trump bucks).
 
That’s okay. We can just give the pork farmers some of that sweet, sweet bailout money that they love so much (as long as it is Trump bucks).
Farmer bailouts are given to make the farmers whole after already being paid for not growing crops which is good.

food stamps, Medicaid, and ACA health insurance subsidies are wasted dollars spent on welfare which is bad.

See the difference ?
 
That’s okay. We can just give the pork farmers some of that sweet, sweet bailout money that they love so much (as long as it is Trump bucks).
No we should not. Remember according to trumpism that socialism and will not be accepted.
 
nothing he says makes sense. I actually think he’s trending Biden. He doesn’t even know what he’s saying.
He has been a liar and distorter of fact his whole life which takes tremendous amounts of creativity. And this response from Trump took creativity to come up with even thou its totally whacko. But he's always used whacko from time to time as a fall back to get himself out of jamming questions. So to me, this is still normal Trump. Which is still..........WTF.
 
That’s okay. We can just give the pork farmers some of that sweet, sweet bailout money that they love so much (as long as it is Trump bucks).


Most of today's American pork farmers are almost always big operations with huge amounts of money invested. So Trump will be totally ok with handing out corporate welfare to them..
 
Most of today's American pork farmers are almost always big operations with huge amounts of money invested. So Trump will be totally ok with handing out corporate welfare to them..
And the biggest one in NC is owned by Chiner Do they get a check?
 
And the biggest one in NC is owned by Chiner Do they get a check?
I was wondering about that. I couldn't remember if that deal actually went through or got blocked.

One of the reasons China was interested in buying the pork producer was specifically to avoid vulnerability in a trade war.

China has been executing its industrial policies at a very high level for two decades. That's why China has the most dynamic economy in the world right now. Think about what it's been achieving despite the legacy from the 20th century. People talk about China's demographics -- well, again, that's a problem mostly inherited from the old, pre-Deng past. It does have an advantage in terms of its population; that's its natural resource.

I don't think a centralized economy is the way for most countries to go. That would be true even if we push other concerns -- i.e. lack of freedom, corruption, authoritarianism -- to the side. But the centralized economy works for China. We should have been paying attention to industrial policy for the past decades but the problem is the GOP keeps fucking it up. Not the only problem, but a big one.

When people talk about the Rust Belt and the decline of American manufacturing, etc. they often cast it as a trade issue. NAFTA is the villain in that story. The WTO is the villain in that story. But trade isn't the issue. It was the lack of industrial policy that had more of an effect. And the fact that our Senate is fucked up and makes it very hard to build the type of huge industrial campus that China has so many of.
 
I was wondering about that. I couldn't remember if that deal actually went through or got blocked.

One of the reasons China was interested in buying the pork producer was specifically to avoid vulnerability in a trade war.

China has been executing its industrial policies at a very high level for two decades. That's why China has the most dynamic economy in the world right now. Think about what it's been achieving despite the legacy from the 20th century. People talk about China's demographics -- well, again, that's a problem mostly inherited from the old, pre-Deng past. It does have an advantage in terms of its population; that's its natural resource.

I don't think a centralized economy is the way for most countries to go. That would be true even if we push other concerns -- i.e. lack of freedom, corruption, authoritarianism -- to the side. But the centralized economy works for China. We should have been paying attention to industrial policy for the past decades but the problem is the GOP keeps fucking it up. Not the only problem, but a big one.

When people talk about the Rust Belt and the decline of American manufacturing, etc. they often cast it as a trade issue. NAFTA is the villain in that story. The WTO is the villain in that story. But trade isn't the issue. It was the lack of industrial policy that had more of an effect. And the fact that our Senate is fucked up and makes it very hard to build the type of huge industrial campus that China has so many of.
Reading about China’s process for driving manufacturing their advanced are impressive.
 
Subaru to make cars for the Canadian market in Japan, rather than the US.


President Donald Trump's tariffs just cost America a chunk of Canadian business.

Subaru, which sold 68,043 cars in Canada in 2024, is reshuffling its supply chain in response to escalating car trade scuffles.


The company sold over 17,700 American-built vehicles in Canada last year, making up 26 percent of its 2024 sales.

But the Japanese automaker’s Canadian division will slash US imports to just 10 percent by the 2026 model year, representing thousands of cars and millions of dollars lost.

The biggest impact will be on the American-built Outback. The popular car will no longer ship north after 2026.

Instead, it will feature a 'made in Japan' badge.

Subaru Canada's CEO, Tomohiro Kubota, said the move will 'minimize the impact of the counter surtax,' according to Automotive News Canada.

For Subaru, it’s cheaper to build and ship cars out of Japan than deal with the political whiplash of US trade policy.
 

Canadians’ ongoing boycott of travelling to the United States is showing up in the U.S. Federal Reserve‘s real-time snapshot of the American economy, which one economist called a “really big deal.”

The Fed’s Beige Book, released on Wednesday, includes reports from cities across the U.S. that say Canadian travel has noticeably fallen off in many regions across the country.

“I’ve been doing this for 40 years, and it’s the first time I’ve ever seen a Beige Book replete with so many comments about not just a Canadian boycott, but an international boycott against travel to the United States,” David Rosenberg, founder of Rosenberg Research & Associates Inc., said.


The Beige Book, which he called “the most comprehensive qualitative analysis on the U.S. economy,” provides a snapshot of the 12 Fed districts. The information is anecdotal, gathered from businesses and community leaders, and provides a way to keep an eye on the economy from the ground up. It also provides insights into emerging trends ahead of incoming data that can be backward-looking.

“Both leisure and business travel were down, on balance, and several districts noted a decline in international visitors,” the Beige Book’s national summary said.

Tourism operators in nine of the districts reported a noticeable decline in travel by Canadians.

“Travel from Canada declined noticeably, and contacts feared that summer travel from Europe and China could suffer as well because of negative reactions to U.S. tariff policies,” the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston said. “More broadly, tourism contacts expressed concerns that declining consumer confidence could hurt leisure spending.”

The Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis said: “Tourism contacts also reported declines in Canadian travellers and related spending; a North Dakota retailer saw a ‘deep impact’ starting in mid-February, pushing first-quarter revenues down seven percent.”
 

Trump Administration Lays Out Roadmap to Streamline Tariff Talks​

Officials have drafted a framework for staggered reciprocal trade negotiations​


🎁 🔗—> https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy...a1?st=7YCh3o&reflink=mobilewebshare_permalink

“…In an attempt to streamline talks over President Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs, officials plan to use a framework prepared by the U.S. Trade Representative’s office that lays out broad categories for negotiation: tariffs and quotas; non-tariff barriers to trade, such as regulations on U.S. goods; digital trade; rules of origin for products; and economic security and other commercial issues, according to people familiar with a draft document outlining the negotiating terms.

Within those categories, U.S. officials would spell out demands for individual nations, people familiar with the matter said, emphasizing that the document could change as the administration gets more input.

… The U.S. is looking to negotiate within the new framework with about 18 major U.S. trading partners on a rolling basis over the next two months, the people familiar with the matter said. The initial plan is for six nations to come in for talks in one week, six nations in a second week, and six nations for a third week of talks—an 18-nation cycle that would then repeat until the administration’s self-imposed July 8 deadline. At that point, reciprocal tariffs would hit nations that can’t reach a deal, unless Trump further extends his 90 day pause.

The planned negotiating timeline could slip if talks hit a snag, one of the people said. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt this week said that the administration has received 18 trade proposals on paper from trading partners that it is currently reviewing. …”

——
I thought Trump said he already had 200 deals? I know, he was just kidding and playing 8-dimensional checkers.
 
Back
Top