- Messages
- 2,083
They should have tested her knowledge of campaign finance laws.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you tell me more about this? I've always been curious about startups in these fields. Did you work in opto-electronic manufacturing before that? As an engineer or an executive or both? How did you raise capital to get what I assume to be expensive machinery? Were you designing the manufacturing process, or more or less implementing something off the shelf (perhaps with tweaks or innovations)? What made you decide to found a company?That's what we did at the opto-electronic contract manufacturer for which I was a co-founder.
Most anyone reading wmheel’s post knows he was expressing an opinion."You seem to be disillusioned as to the Constitution having any weight at all in this moment in history. It doesn't," is a lecture. In that sentence, you are placing yourself as the authority, correcting "disillusioned" me.
If you were expressing an opinion, you would say, "I don't know if the Constitution has any weight."
You weren't aware of that provision in Article I. Why not just admit it? Instead, you decided to say that the constitution doesn't matter, which is silly and in denial about how things work even in a corrupt oligarchy, and took a condescending tone to boot. And I'm sensing a Zenmode digression from you about the meaning of the word lecture.
Yes, a dismissive one. A condescending one. There are topics about which he can condescend to me. He knows way more about UNC athletics than I do, and about what goes on behind the scenes. He's a donor and I'm not. He obviously knows more about the real estate market in North Carolina, and likely nationally, at least about the mechanical aspects. If I were to challenge him, he'd be right to lecture me. About the constitution?Most anyone reading wmheel’s post knows he was expressing an opinion.
LOL. Trump simply doesn't hire the brightest bulbs in the pack, and never has. I'd love to compare her knowledge of tariffs compared to that reporter or most of Trump's critics. I'm betting she will lose that battle every time.They should have tested her knowledge of campaign finance laws.
Easier to just blame Biden, even though it doesn't make any sense. Trump knows his propaganda arm will promote that narrative (and they have) and his cult will lap it up with zero scrutiny (and they have).
Depending on their age, hope those fellas enjoy working an extra decade or so!
Did you ask what the fuck needs to be balanced?I overheard two morons (trumpers) this morning discussing the pending recession and how it's needed to "balance" things.
How can Trump shoot himself in the dick or foot?
He wasn’t being dismissive or condescending.Yes, a dismissive one. A condescending one. There are topics about which he can condescend to me. He knows way more about UNC athletics than I do, and about what goes on behind the scenes. He's a donor and I'm not. He obviously knows more about the real estate market in North Carolina, and likely nationally, at least about the mechanical aspects. If I were to challenge him, he'd be right to lecture me. About the constitution?
Whatever. I don't care. It's just tiresome. States still can't sign free trade deals with other countries.
One of my swimming rivals growing up ended up being the best swimmer in the state (Top 10 national times in 10-12 events for YEARS). When we were 8 & under and 9-10, he was FAT. Not pudgy. Not chubby. Fat. He was also technically sound - great free, back, and fly strokes. His fatness slowed him down; but, he was often Top 5 in the state.
We’ll be able to find other markets for our steel and our aluminium and we have been diversifying those markets.
These US tariffs on UK steel exports are hugely damaging and they threaten jobs. For the US it’s also self-defeating, as the UK is a leading supplier of specialist steel products required by their defence and aerospace sectors.
The UK’s response must include delivering a robust Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) and the strongest possible trade defence measures to shield our sector from diverted imports.
We’re incredibly disappointed that the US has decided to take this course of action, and we will continue to work with steel companies and the UK government to deliver the best possible outcome for our members and our industry.
We will always remain open to negotiation. We firmly believe that in a world fraught with geopolitical and economic uncertainties, it is not in our common interest to burden our economies with tariffs.