- Messages
- 923
calm down francis you need to adjust your sarcasm meterWhat are you talking about? Ram said he didn't mention trans. He did. I am not and have not spoken about the killer at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
calm down francis you need to adjust your sarcasm meterWhat are you talking about? Ram said he didn't mention trans. He did. I am not and have not spoken about the killer at all.
You don't think he was put in a bullet-proof vest when he was arrested to prevent another assassination?
IMO this is the most underdiscussed threat to the future of society. We're talking about significant proportions of Gen Z and Gen A who have no ability to function in society and whose social existence is exclusively online.Completely agree. This - not “woke” - is the real story about the brewing/already here crisis with young men. Their brains seem so much more vulnerable to this toxic blend of crypto, sports betting, porn, rage bait, political nihilism, etc. Unless people wake up and start working together to change these online spaces and how we interact with them, we are literally going to continue poisoning peoples brains until we start to lose the ability to have healthy interactions with each other.
Cancel culture might get blamed in the next monthly jobs report.
I thought it was very strange that the governor was the primary speaker at all of those press conferences. Typically a governor (or mayor, or President, or whatever senior executive is present) will offer their concerns and condolences and turn the podium over to the police chief (or fire chief, or FBI AIC, or FEMA official, etc) to discuss details and progress of an investigation.That needs a great deal more attribution and explanation. Why are they getting this kind of quotations from the governor rather than the investigators? Who is the "us" that Governor Cox references? Why can't those investigators speak for themselves? How is "leftist ideology" actually defined in Utah...by a GOP Governor?
You might want to also understand the trans person's life. His maga parents play a role here.
The vast majority of shooters are white males, not Trans.
This is a damn good ZenMode impersonation.do you have concrete proof he wasnt a mentally ill trans? lmao
Guess that qualifies as one more on the super ignore list.This is a damn good ZenMode impersonation.
I agree over the last 2 days. In fact, it has affected me to the point that I had to ask myself what the fuck am I doing getting caught up in it. I have been disgusted with most politicians on the right who have made public comments. I told my son today that if by some chance Nancy Mace is the pub nominee for governor I will have to vote for the D candidate. But I completely disagree with you that it has been that way for a while. There has been plenty to go around from the left
Biden - "We're done talking about the debate. It's time to put Trump in a bullseye"
Pelosi, Harris, Biden, Schumer - "Trump is a threat to democracy"
"Today’s political and rhetorical landscape is intensely polarized and fueled by anger, distrust and conspiracy theories. It’s easier to target your political opponents for violence if you see them as “enemies of the nation,” Boyle said." So calling republicans nazis, fascists, etc. is doing just that. How long has the left been using those terms? Since trump 1.0.
My point isn't in keeping score. Its that these past 2 days have been a wake up call for me in that the republican party and democratic party, with the assistance of social media influencers and bots have been taken over by the propensity to use violent rhetoric and the only way to stop it is by a collective effort from the everyday man/woman to reject it in social media and hold politicians accountable. I'm not hopeful.
This reminded me of an article about a podcast I read recently (I can’t find it not behind a paywall)IMO this is the most underdiscussed threat to the future of society. We're talking about significant proportions of Gen Z and Gen A who have no ability to function in society and whose social existence is exclusively online.
As Brandy Zadrozny (a reporter who specializes in online extremism) said last night, you can find radical and violent leftist content online but it's well overshadowed by the ocean of rightest extremism, especially in the gaming and young male communities.
I agree with Walsh here — a grieving widow should get some space to grieve but this was a political and intentionally divisive speech … I wouldn’t be surprised if she didn’t write it but in the end she delivered it.
Interesting stuff. My best youth memories involve things like "following a creek"-see where it starts or ends. I lived in town-but we had creeks in town and they wandered through the woods. Or Driveway basketball games-or a random field touch football gameThis reminded me of an article about a podcast I read recently (I can’t find it not behind a paywall)
For years, experts and parents alike have debated how to get children off their devices. Limiting screen time, blocking apps and setting stricter household rules are common strategies. But what if the problem isn’t the technology itself but the loss of freedom to simply be a kid?
Hosts Richard Kyte and Scott Rada look at a revealing report from The Atlantic that asked children directly how they would spend less time online. The most common response was not more rules or stricter discipline — it was more unstructured play with friends, free from constant supervision.
The answers highlight a cultural shift. Over the past several decades, the independence once common for children — riding bikes across town, walking to the corner store or wandering through a local park — has steadily disappeared. Parents often cite safety concerns, and social norms reinforce the idea that letting kids roam is risky. Yet statistics show that many communities are actually safer today than in past generations.
The episode raises an uncomfortable possibility: children are not “addicted” to screens so much as they are starved for spaces where they can make choices and explore without adults hovering nearby. Smartphones, for all their flaws, offer at least the perception of autonomy. They allow young people to connect, interact and discover on their own terms — even if those experiences are shaped by algorithms.