The Charlie Kirk Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rock
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 3K
  • Views: 63K
  • Politics 
How dishonest and odious that this administration and right wing media are leveraging Kirk's murder to demonize the trans community and go after "trans terror cells" (which definitely exist! trust us!) when the crime was committed by a white, cisgender male raised in the right's extreme gun culture. Even the evidence presented in the information filing indicates that the possibly-transitioning roommate had no knowledge of what Robinson was planning. It seems that Robinson could no longer tolerate Kirk's years-long, dehumanizing rhetoric directed toward the LGBTQ community, of which he was allegedly a part, and made the catastrophically destructive decision to take matters into his own hands.

Some in the MAGAverse have now pivoted to the narrative that Robinson being cisgender is actually worse than if he were transgender because this indicates that the trans community is using their toxic ideology to radicalize "normie" liberals who will then carry out political violence. But hey, we all need to bring down the temperature, right?
I’d change what you wrote about “…raised in the right’s extreme gun culture….”

We don’t know that. Being taught to shoot isn’t necessarily part of “the right’s extreme gun culture.”

Just like we don’t know his motive for the murder.
 
Robinson: Why did I do it?

Roommate: Yeah

Robinson: I had enough of his hatred


Saying that he had "enough of [Kirk's] hatred" is more left-leaning than right-leaning. By and large, conservatives see Kirk as a truth teller and liberals see him as a hate monger.
You’re leaping.
 
You mean two of them?

Highly unlikely.
I understand why you are skeptical. But I think it is highly unlikely a false text would be alleged in a charging document. If the prosecutors did that, it would violate their oath and lead to potential sanctions from the court. It would also significantly imperil a high-profile prosecution. Occam’s razor says that is unlikely.
 
I understand why you are skeptical. But I think it is highly unlikely a false text would be alleged in a charging document. If the prosecutors did that, it would violate their oath and lead to potential sanctions from the court. It would also significantly imperil a high-profile prosecution. Occam’s razor says that is unlikely.
I would normally agree but normal logic does not apply when talking about these lunatics. Nothing is beyond the pale.
 
I would normally agree but normal logic does not apply when talking about these lunatics. Nothing is beyond the pale.
Again, there are front line prosecutors putting their name on that document. Even if you think everyone in the Trump administration is a lying sack of shit (and you would not be wrong), you’d have to assume that the conspiracy to defraud runs to the front line Utah prosecutors, as well. Most likely they are Mormon, which means that have an even stronger belief that they need to be perceived as good people. I don’t see local prosecutors filing a charging document with a knowingly false text.
 
Again, there are front line prosecutors putting their name on that document. Even if you think everyone in the Trump administration is a lying sack of shit (and you would not be wrong), you’d have to assume that the conspiracy to defraud runs to the front line Utah prosecutors, as well. Most likely they are Mormon, which means that have an even stronger belief that they need to be perceived as good people. I don’t see local prosecutors filing a charging document with a knowingly false text.
It’s not impossible. MAGA will protect MAGA.
 

Some things in his texts that look like bullshit…….
  • “…my vehicle….” Who refers to a car or truck as “my vehicle”
  • “….my old man….” Really?
  • How long have you planning/thinking about this …….a stilted, “…a bit over a week I believe…”
  • “…change outfits……” Outfits? WTF?
 
Folks this is why the internet is bad for trying to react to events if they happen. There's so much information flying around and it's very difficult to know what is true, what's rumor, what' s guessing, etc. Instead of trying to settle the argument about whose "side" this guy on (it may well end up being nobody's side) everyone would be better served by letting this thing play out, which could take a long time.
 
Folks this is why the internet is bad for trying to react to events if they happen. There's so much information flying around and it's very difficult to know what is true, what's rumor, what' s guessing, etc. Instead of trying to settle the argument about whose "side" this guy on (it may well end up being nobody's side) everyone would be better served by letting this thing play out, which could take a long time.
And that folks, wins the prize for the post that makes the most sense in these 164 pages. We will find out the truth and declare whether the blue or red team won later. The loser is already determined, Kirk, his family, and this country. Sad, sad times.
 
And that folks, wins the prize for the post that makes the most sense in these 164 pages. We will find out the truth and declare whether the blue or red team won later. The loser is already determined, Kirk, his family, and this country. Sad, sad times.
We might not learn “the truth.”
 
Back
Top