Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've read 2 football fields several times. Either way, I would be willing to bet money that most of the people talking about this couldn't hit a target from 400 ft. Especially with the additional variables in this situation.Where are you getting 700+ feet? The stuff I've seen about the suspected location of the shooter is that it was 400-500 feet away.
But in any event, while I can't speak for others, my point is not that it was an "easy shot." My point is that it is premature to jump to the conclusion that this must have been a professional and sophisticated operation rather than a single person acting alone, which is the same thing that happened when Trump was grazed in Pennsylvania.
This is good news. I hope the catch the fucker alive.11:52 am subject arrived on campus
went through the building up the stairways to the roof
after the shooting went to another part of the building, jumped off the roof, walked off campus into a neighborhood.
they have good video footage of the shooter via doorbell and security cams. they are not releasing the image now
they are confident in their abilities to identify and track the shooter
I'm not debating that larger point. I sure as heck couldn't hit anything from 400 feet. Again, I don't think anyone's point is to suggest that making this shot was "easy" or didn't require firearms training. Simply that it did not require some sort of professional organization to pull off.I've read 2 football fields in multiple articles. Either way, I would be willing to bet money that most of the people talking about this couldn't hit a target from 400 ft. Especially with the additional variables in this situation.
We’re kinda repeating the conversation, but my take is that with a modern weapon, including a high-quality scope, that at ~200 yards it’s not a shot that a novice would likely make but also not one that requires specialized training, either. In the kind of environment where Kirk was shot - fairly open area with no major barriers between the shooter and the target, an elevated position from which to shoot, a target that is sitting in one spot and not making major movements - it’s a shot that someone with relatively normal but thorough experience (like hunting) would have a reasonable chance to make.Ok.
On this point I disagree with what I'm reading. How many here think they could hit a human target from 700+ ft in a controlled environment such as a range?
The imagine the other variables associated.
Maybe it helps to figure out who might have done it, I'm not sure, but it is interesting how many think this was an easy shot all variables considered.
I think bolt action rifle vs an AR-15 helped in that capacity. The Trump attempt had several other people hit and the one man killed because it was more of a spray and pray situation. This was a weapon for this job it seems.I have thought (but did not want to say out loud immediately after the seeing the shooting videos) that we are weirdly fortunate that this was a very targeted attack and not a mass shooting. There were a lot of people in a small area and obviously the shooter had a good line of site if he wanted to carry out a mass shooting event instead.
Which is not meant to diminish the assassination of Kirk standing on its own as a vile act. Just in the era of mass shootings this could have been even worse and as sad as I am for Kirk’s family (and for the negative impact on the social fabric of this nation), I’m glad it wasn’t a Vegas type of mass shooting.
I agree, but I've also read "Novice" multiple times.I'm not debating that larger point. I sure as heck couldn't hit anything from 400 feet. Again, I don't think anyone's point is to suggest that making this shot was "easy" or didn't require firearms training. Simply that it did not require some sort of professional organization to pull off.
Yeah, the rifle also suggests the intent of a specific target and not a mass murder event.I think bolt action rifle vs an AR-15 helped in that capacity. The Trump attempt had several other people hit and the one man killed because it was more of a spray and pray situation. This was a weapon for this job it seems.
Incorrect.
Considering anyone can walk into virtually any building on any public university or college campus during regular business hours, no, it’s highly unlikely he had or needed any help accessing the rooftop.
wtf? Where do you live, if I may ask?The Right is making Charlie Kirk into a martyr. On my way to work this morning I saw 3 different businesses with their flags at half mast. Since I have been at work I have had 2 people tell me to my face you guys did this and you picked the wrong man to kill. This is getting scary.
Agreed. Used to sit on top of Old East at night.I got on all sorts of rooftops and tunnels I wasn’t supposed to be in at UNC very easily.
Distances to various points on the roof. (not counting height - I don't have that info and I really don't feel like googling that right now and be seen as a copycat)I've read 2 football fields several times. Either way, I would be willing to bet money that most of the people talking about this couldn't hit a target from 400 ft. Especially with the additional variables in this situation.
Or someone who knew the area, put together a decent plan, and got a bit lucky.Not necessarily a super operative, just someone who generally knows what they’re doing. Being current or former military/law enforcement/hunter, doesn’t mean it’s Chris Kyle or Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson from Taken). It just means it’s somebody more put together than the whack jobs that normally do these things.
It’s 9/11 man calm down…Stop being so scary…The Right is making Charlie Kirk into a martyr. On my way to work this morning I saw 3 different businesses with their flags at half mast. Since I have been at work I have had 2 people tell me to my face you guys did this and you picked the wrong man to kill. This is getting scary.