wmheel was a “conservative” “Republican” most of his life.
Isn't the most dangerous state new mexico? Maybe not.
You're truly a freaking lunatic, dude. You still haven't rebutted a single statistic I've posted and you can't answer why your hero who is "owning" everybody didn't think of this in his first term when violent crime in DC was worse. Instead you just went on a crazy rant where Trump is rubbing asses raw and hurting asses (lol) by wasting money on a for-show crime crackdown in a city where it is already in decline. As for blue-voting cities being shitholes, you are engaging in nothing but GOP stereotyping and Fox News fearmongering. As has been pointed out by other posters, the most high-crime places in the USA are often in red states, and often aren't the largest cities. So why isn't Dear Leader deploying the troops in these violent areas? Because they're MAGA Country, that's why. There is simply nothing that this administration does that you will not automatically defend, literally nothing.
Great. Tell me which conservative forums you are an active member of? So I can expect any future communication from you to me to be polite, objective, and open minded, and not influenced by any comments I make to other posters on this board, and based solely on my level of discourse with you directly? Sounds like we are headed down a constructive path.
Though I find myself wondering why DC police don’t enforce the laws already on the books.
At times Trump has shown patience with violent protests.
I am not a member of any other forums of any kind. You challenged me to have a calm political discussion and I said I have them all the time.
Red states like Tennessee? Where dimocrat led memphis skews the numbers for the state?
What a miserable fucking pathetic life you must lead.
you claimed all my posts were partisan pissing matches. I don't have partisan pissing matches with people who are polite and open minded. So if in addressing me you aren't engaging in that type of discourse, I'm obliged to treat you equally in any conversation we have. There are examples on the board with some posters where that type of discussion occurs. You base it on a body of work, I base it on how someone engages me and their sincerity in having a constructive discussion. Its an anonymous message board. You really can't go by anything other than direct interaction.
I lead a hate free life. I have to believe you wish you could to.
It's like he isn't even reading the posts here, because he doesn't really respond to what people post. Instead he keeps responding to whatever he thinks a "typical" LibDem as Fox News presents them would say and think. I'm sure he'll claim that he never watches Fox News, but nearly all of the keywords he uses - "Russia, Russia, Russia", "Dimocrat" "sheep", "TDS", George Floyd, and so on - are terms constantly found on Fox News and right-wing media sites. And some wonder why so many people here call most Trump posters trolls who aren't really interested in serious discussions, or why debating them is pointless. Of course I've been guilty of debating one tonight, so I guess I haven't yet learned my own lesson, lol.
Man, what is it with the liberal lawyers on the board not living up to the expectations and standards of their profession? You guys seemingly cornered the market on situational ethics. Can you prove I voted for a child molester? I can prove, through your own admission, you voted for enabling the murder of Laken Riley and had no hesitation of enabling future murders, rapes, and child trafficking. So spare me your sanctimonious bullshit of putting child molesters in prison. Kind of meaningless when for every one you put in jail, you played a role in allowing a thousand more to be raped, molested, trafficked, or killed. That is truly pathetic.
You haven't debated a damn thing. All you do is keep asking some asinine question about why didn't trump do it during his first term. Who gives a shit? Why does it matter? He's doing it now. What meaningful point have you debated in the entire discussion?
Trump led Jan 6 and pardoned the criminals who attacked or capitol, politicians, and police for him.
Trump freed a convicted venezuelan triple murderer from their jail and released him on our soil.
Wow you are really focused on that one tree and missing the forest.
Oh, I dunno, maybe those pesky stats showing that violent crime is steadily dropping in DC (just confirmed by the White House on your favorite network, Fox News) and to which your response has basically been that you don't care because <something, something> it's still too high in your opinion and Dear Leader's opinion, because as we all know big cities are crime-infested hellholes that can only be saved by sending in the troops. And your only response to a perfectly legitimate question about why, if crime in DC is so bad that Trump needed to act, he didn't do this in his first term has been to basically say that you don't give a damn and maybe I need to write him a letter, which isn't actually debating anything either - it's just ignoring points that are made and using right-wing cliches and stereotypes in response ("Russia, Russia, Russia", seriously?).
