Trump Admin takes over D.C. Policing

  • Thread starter Thread starter nycfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Replies: 2K
  • Views: 49K
  • Politics 
lol. you hide in this echo chamber where you get nothing but affirmation of your hatred. Carry your ass over to a conservative dominated board and lets see how you interact. Let me know which one and I will gladly observe quietly. Its people like you who drive the partisan pissing matches. Try to have one objective political discussion. You can't.
wmheel was a “conservative” “Republican” most of his life.

He’s a successful entrepreneur and business owner (he donated enough to the Rams Club to get good football, basketball, and baseball tickets).

He EMPLOYS people. He works in a field filled with not Liberal people. If a Bernie Sanders is the Democratic nominee, he’s not voting for the Democrat.

You’re so right-wing you can’t see a centrist.
 
Red state Louisiana is the most dangerous in the US, but it's a red state. No fed troops will be deployed. The same for red state Little Rock, Memphis, St. Louis.

Meanwhile, tonight we're going to party like it's 1939.

Isn't the most dangerous state new mexico? Maybe not.

Sounds to me like trump has little patience for george floyd type "demonstrations" where people's property and businesses get destroyed by paid protesters and those to dumb to understand what the "protest" is about. Bet he wouldn't interfere with a peaceful protest conducted legally. Not sure you guys grasp that concept though.
 
That you would think all is well and no action needed because dc crime statistics fell to a level that is still among the highest in the country shows zero perspective. Based on your logic, a team could win 1 game for 49 straight years, then in the 50th year win 2 games and that is proof that the coach shouldn't be fired. DC is a shit hole and crime ridden to any objective person not consumed with trump hatred. As are detroit, memphis, baltimore, etc. He can't as easily address the crime problems in those cities as he can in dc. As for why now instead of his first term, who knows. Write him a letter and ask him yourself. That only matters to people who have had their brains eaten by trump. What really rubs your ass raw is that he will likely be successful like he was at the border, will get a public perception win, and it will further solidify the dim party as weak on crime. You acting all ass hurt as if his motivation isn't pure is extremely naive. It's trump. his motivation is never pure but it is both politically smart as it keeps the press off his back, and rubs salt in the open wound the dims have with being soft on crime. He is owning people like you right now.
You're truly a freaking lunatic, dude. You still haven't rebutted a single statistic I've posted and you can't answer why your hero who is "owning" everybody didn't think of this in his first term when violent crime in DC was worse. Instead you just went on a crazy rant where Trump is rubbing asses raw and hurting asses (lol) by wasting money on a for-show crime crackdown in a city where it is already in decline. As for blue-voting cities being shitholes, you are engaging in nothing but GOP stereotyping and Fox News fearmongering. As has been pointed out by other posters, the most high-crime places in the USA are often in red states, and often aren't the largest cities. So why isn't Dear Leader deploying the troops in these violent areas? Because they're MAGA Country, that's why. There is simply nothing that this administration does that you will not automatically defend, literally nothing.
 
I have them all the time and i dont hide anywhere. My identity is well known and I express myself regularly to people of all political stripes. I participate here because of the UNC tie to the board, not because it's liberal or even because it's political.
Great. Tell me which conservative forums you are an active member of? So I can expect any future communication from you to me to be polite, objective, and open minded, and not influenced by any comments I make to other posters on this board, and based solely on my level of discourse with you directly? Sounds like we are headed down a constructive path.
 
Isn't the most dangerous state new mexico? Maybe not.

Sounds to me like trump has little patience for george floyd type "demonstrations" where people's property and businesses get destroyed by paid protesters and those to dumb to understand what the "protest" is about. Bet he wouldn't interfere with a peaceful protest conducted legally. Not sure you guys grasp that concept though.
At times Trump has shown patience with violent protests.
 
Great. Tell me which conservative forums you are an active member of? So I can expect any future communication from you to me to be polite, objective, and open minded, and not influenced by any comments I make to other posters on this board, and based solely on my level of discourse with you directly? Sounds like we are headed down a constructive path.
I am not a member of any other forums of any kind. You challenged me to have a calm political discussion and I said I have them all the time.

As for your expectations...I honestly don't think you can be serious with that. How could I possibly only use our direct interactions as a basis for how I interpret you and your beliefs? It's a message board designed for open crosstalk. We all use the overall body of work of posters as a lens through which to view that person.
 
You're truly a freaking lunatic, dude. You still haven't rebutted a single statistic I've posted and you can't answer why your hero who is "owning" everybody didn't think of this in his first term when violent crime in DC was worse. Instead you just went on a crazy rant where Trump is rubbing asses raw and hurting asses (lol) by wasting money on a for-show crime crackdown in a city where it is already in decline. As for blue-voting cities being shitholes, you are engaging in nothing but GOP stereotyping and Fox News fearmongering. As has been pointed out by other posters, the most high-crime places in the USA are often in red states, and often aren't the largest cities. So why isn't Dear Leader deploying the troops in these violent areas? Because they're MAGA Country, that's why. There is simply nothing that this administration does that you will not automatically defend, literally nothing.
Red states like Tennessee? Where dimocrat led memphis skews the numbers for the state?

I called trump and told him some dumb ass with terminal tds wanted to know why he didn't federalize the dc police during his first term. He told me to tell you he planned to but was to busy defending himself form bullshit lies made up by dimocrat sheep and their media to keep him from winning the election. He said to tell you its a shame because he could have saved hundreds of lives if people like mulberry hadn't been so gullible and easily manipulated. He hoped you wouldn't feel guilty for your role in the loss of the lives he couldn't save due to your hysteria over russia, russia, russia.
 
Red states like Tennessee? Where dimocrat led memphis skews the numbers for the state?

I called trump and told him some dumb ass with terminal tds wanted to know why he didn't federalize the dc police during his first term. He told me to tell you he planned to but was to busy defending himself form bullshit lies made up by dimocrat sheep and their media to keep him from winning the election. He said to tell you it’s a shame because he could have saved hundreds of lives if people like mulberry hadn't been so gullible and easily manipulated. He hoped you wouldn't feel guilty for your role in the loss of the lives he couldn't save due to your hysteria over russia, russia, russia.
What a miserable fucking pathetic life you must lead.
 
I am not a member of any other forums of any kind. You challenged me to have a calm political discussion and I said I have them all the time.

As for your expectations...I honestly don't think you can be serious with that. How could I possibly only use our direct interactions as a basis for how I interpret you and your beliefs? It's a message board designed for open crosstalk. We all use the overall body of work of posters as a lens through which to view that person.
you claimed all my posts were partisan pissing matches. I don't have partisan pissing matches with people who are polite and open minded. So if in addressing me you aren't engaging in that type of discourse, I'm obliged to treat you equally in any conversation we have. There are examples on the board with some posters where that type of discussion occurs. You base it on a body of work, I base it on how someone engages me and their sincerity in having a constructive discussion. Its an anonymous message board. You really can't go by anything other than direct interaction.
 
What a miserable fucking pathetic life you must lead.
It's like he isn't even reading the posts here, because he doesn't really respond to what people post. Instead he keeps responding to whatever he thinks a "typical" LibDem as Fox News presents them would say and think. I'm sure he'll claim that he never watches Fox News, but nearly all of the keywords he uses - "Russia, Russia, Russia", "Dimocrat" "sheep", "TDS", George Floyd, and so on - are terms constantly found on Fox News and right-wing media sites. And some wonder why so many people here call most Trump posters trolls who aren't really interested in serious discussions, or why debating them is pointless. Of course I've been guilty of debating one tonight, so I guess I haven't yet learned my own lesson, lol.
 
I put child molesters in prison, and you voted for one. Three times.

Pathetic.
Man, what is it with the liberal lawyers on the board not living up to the expectations and standards of their profession? You guys seemingly cornered the market on situational ethics. Can you prove I voted for a child molester? I can prove, through your own admission, you voted for enabling the murder of Laken Riley and had no hesitation of enabling future murders, rapes, and child trafficking. So spare me your sanctimonious bullshit of putting child molesters in prison. Kind of meaningless when for every one you put in jail, you played a role in allowing a thousand more to be raped, molested, trafficked, or killed. That is truly pathetic.
 
It's like he isn't even reading the posts here, because he doesn't really respond to what people post. Instead he keeps responding to whatever he thinks a "typical" LibDem as Fox News presents them would say and think. I'm sure he'll claim that he never watches Fox News, but nearly all of the keywords he uses - "Russia, Russia, Russia", "Dimocrat" "sheep", "TDS", George Floyd, and so on - are terms constantly found on Fox News and right-wing media sites. And some wonder why so many people here call most Trump posters trolls who aren't really interested in serious discussions, or why debating them is pointless. Of course I've been guilty of debating one tonight, so I guess I haven't yet learned my own lesson, lol.
You haven't debated a damn thing. All you do is keep asking some asinine question about why didn't trump do it during his first term. Who gives a shit? Why does it matter? He's doing it now. What meaningful point have you debated in the entire discussion?
 
Isn't the most dangerous state new mexico? Maybe not.

Sounds to me like trump has little patience for george floyd type "demonstrations" where people's property and businesses get destroyed by paid protesters and those to dumb to understand what the "protest" is about. Bet he wouldn't interfere with a peaceful protest conducted legally. Not sure you guys grasp that concept though.
Trump led Jan 6 and pardoned the criminals who attacked or capitol, politicians, and police for him.
 
Man, what is it with the liberal lawyers on the board not living up to the expectations and standards of their profession? You guys seemingly cornered the market on situational ethics. Can you prove I voted for a child molester? I can prove, through your own admission, you voted for enabling the murder of Laken Riley and had no hesitation of enabling future murders, rapes, and child trafficking. So spare me your sanctimonious bullshit of putting child molesters in prison. Kind of meaningless when for every one you put in jail, you played a role in allowing a thousand more to be raped, molested, trafficked, or killed. That is truly pathetic.
Trump freed a convicted venezuelan triple murderer from their jail and released him on our soil.

Why?
 
I can't wait to see what happens but what I won't do is be convinced this is a bad thing by anyone who supported the party who pumped in excess of 10 million people into this county from some or the most dangerous parts of this world completely unvetted? For all any of you know, many of the people who came in were the very same people who made the countries from which they were escaping so dangerous. And now they are here, being protected by the party who welcomed them in with open arm and free everything. We wouldn't have the problems we have today, certainly not in this magnitude, if not for soft on crime liberal policies.

And I hope the cops are truly allowed to do their jobs. The days of people being allowed to throw bricks, fireworks, frozen water bottles, spit in the faces of law enforcement etc. without them being able to properly defend themselves should end today. And I hope the message is sent in loud and clear fashion that those days are over.
Wow you are really focused on that one tree and missing the forest.

So, your ok with felons being pardoned then the same man thinks he can do a better job enforcing the law?

Even though this is about his dictatorship more than it is crime. He's pushing the limits of his power.

I guess you also disregard the data showing crime at 30 year lows in DC?

Yea, it's all about policy right, you're not just accepting anything the cult leader feeds you, right. If anyone else were doing this you would be up in arms against it.
 
Last edited:
You haven't debated a damn thing. All you do is keep asking some asinine question about why didn't trump do it during his first term. Who gives a shit? Why does it matter? He's doing it now. What meaningful point have you debated in the entire discussion?
Oh, I dunno, maybe those pesky stats showing that violent crime is steadily dropping in DC (just confirmed by the White House on your favorite network, Fox News) and to which your response has basically been that you don't care because <something, something> it's still too high in your opinion and Dear Leader's opinion, because as we all know big cities are crime-infested hellholes that can only be saved by sending in the troops. And your only response to a perfectly legitimate question about why, if crime in DC is so bad that Trump needed to act, he didn't do this in his first term has been to basically say that you don't give a damn and maybe I need to write him a letter, which isn't actually debating anything either - it's just ignoring points that are made and using right-wing cliches and stereotypes in response ("Russia, Russia, Russia", seriously?).

Although I did see that Trump's reinforcements in DC did arrest a guy for throwing a Subway sandwich at cops and charge him with a felony, so I'm sure that conservatives are really getting to the bottom of things in DC. Carry on, dude, I'm done with arguing with a guy whose main response to anything I post is to say that you don't give a damn and yell that Trump is "rubbing my ass raw" and "kicking my ass" and so on. What is it with your obsession with that part of the anatomy?
 
Back
Top